journal article·2025-11-30Open access

PERSEUS: Protection-Enhanced Resilient System for Securing Ubiquitous Healthcare Solutions

Miguel Landry Foko Sindjoung, Garrik Brel Jagho Mdemaya, Martinien Deffo Foko, Mthulisi Velempini

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

The increasing use of medical applications using mobile devices has led to increased concerns about data security. Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) is an emerging technology that can be used to improve end-user services, especially in medical applications that require low latency and high bandwidth. MEC provides a promising solution that brings data processing closer to the end user to process requests faster. In doing so, security concerns about communication links and MEC server faults become a problem for MEC architectures and the concerned applications. In this paper, we propose a secure and fault-tolerant mechanism for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) based on an MEC architecture in a Software-Defined Network. Then, we present a secure scheme that consists of four main steps. (1) Establishment of secure virtual private network connection to secure network communication, (2) monitoring of network traffic to detect threats, (3) application of intrusion prevention measures, and (4) updating of security rules to prevent future attacks. The fault-tolerant aspect is developed based on the Kubernetes cluster to avoid service disruption in case of faults on a given MEC server. The simulation results depict substantial improvements, including reduced latency, better workload equilibrium, increased achievable throughput, and reduced retransmissions between servers. Our proposed scheme is effective in detecting distributed denial of service attacks. Moreover, in the event of an MEC server fault, the service is not interrupted and the architecture continues to render optimal services.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Advanced Authentication Protocols Security · Security and Verification in Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, University of Limpopo, Mankweng 0727, South Africa

Department of Computer Engineering, Fotso Victor University Institute of Technology, University of Dschang, Dschang P.O. Box 96, Cameroon

Funding

National Research Foundation of South Africa

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. A data security and privacy scheme for user quality of experience in a Mobile Edge Computing-based network10.1016/j.array.2023.100304 ↗
2. ITCN: An Intelligent Trust Collaboration Network System in IoT10.1109/TNSE.2021.3057881 ↗
3. Ding, D., Conti, M., and Solanas, A. (2016, January 11). A smart health application and its related privacy issues. Proceedings of the 2016 Smart City Security and Privacy Workshop (SCSP-W), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/SCSPW.2016.7509558 ↗
4. DRLR: A Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-Based Recruitment Scheme for Massive Data Collections in 6G-Based IoT Networks10.1109/JIOT.2021.3067904 ↗
5. Multi-Access Edge Computing: A Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034136 ↗
6. A MEC architecture for a better quality of service in an Autonomous Vehicular Network10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109454 ↗
7. A hybrid approach for fault-tolerance aware load balancing in fog computing10.1007/s10586-023-04219-z ↗
8. Security and privacy of internet of medical things: A contemporary review in the age of surveillance, botnets, and adversarial ML10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103332 ↗
9. Internet of Medical Things and Edge Computing for Improving Healthcare in Smart Cities
10. MEC-IoT-Healthcare: Analysis and Prospects
11. Islam, U., Alatawi, M.N., Alqazzaz, A., Alamro, S., Shah, B., and Moreira, F. (2025). A hybrid fog-edge computing architecture for real-time health monitoring in IoMT systems with optimized latency and threat resilience. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-09696-3 ↗
12. Hu, X. (2020). Mobile Edge Computing in Wireless Communication Networks: Design and Optimization. [Ph.D. Thesis, UCL (University College London)].
13. Enabling technologies for green internet of things10.1109/JSYST.2015.2415194 ↗
14. Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095 ↗
15. A survey on security and privacy of 5G technologies: Potential solutions, recent advancements, and future directions10.1109/COMST.2019.2933899 ↗
16. Bormann, C., Ersue, M., and Keranen, A. (2014). RFC 7228: Terminology for Constrained-Node Networks, Internet Engineering Task Force.10.17487/rfc7228 ↗
17. Secure lightweight IoT integrated RFID mobile healthcare system10.1155/2020/1468281 ↗
18. Two RFID-based solutions for secure inpatient medication administration10.1007/s10916-011-9753-7 ↗
19. Sadeghi, A.R., Visconti, I., and Wachsmann, C. (2008, January 9). User privacy in transport systems based on RFID e-tickets. Proceedings of the PiLBA’08 Privacy in Location-Based Applications, Malaga, Spain.
20. Dachyar, M., Zagloel, T.Y.M., and Saragih, L.R. (2019). Knowledge growth and development: Internet of things (IoT) research, 2006–2018. Heliyon, 5.10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02264 ↗
21. A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems10.1109/COMST.2018.2862350 ↗
22. The Future of Healthcare Internet of Things: A Survey of Emerging Technologies10.1109/COMST.2020.2973314 ↗
23. Efficient Load-Balancing and Container Deployment for Enhancing Latency in an Edge Computing-Based IoT Network Using Kubernetes for Orchestration
24. Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391 ↗
25. Complementing IoT Services Through Software Defined Networking and Edge Computing: A Comprehensive Survey10.1109/COMST.2020.2997475 ↗
26. Demystifying IoT Security: An Exhaustive Survey on IoT Vulnerabilities and a First Empirical Look on Internet-Scale IoT Exploitations10.1109/COMST.2019.2910750 ↗
27. PEFTOSPRO: A Power-Efficient and Fault-Tolerant Scheme for Permutation Routing in Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks10.1007/s10776-024-00615-3 ↗
28. Utilization of mobile edge computing on the Internet of Medical Things: A survey10.1016/j.icte.2022.05.006 ↗
29. Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Xie, W., Zuo, W., Zhao, Y., and Wei, Y. (2023). A Network Traffic Anomaly Detection Method Based on Gaussian Mixture Model. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12061397 ↗
30. Dynamic thresholding for video anomaly detection10.1049/ipr2.12532 ↗
31. Vacca, J.R. (2017). Chapter 9—Fault Tolerance and Resilience in Cloud Computing Environments. Computer and Information Security Handbook, Morgan Kaufmann. [3rd ed.].
32. kubeFlower: A privacy-preserving framework for Kubernetes-based federated learning in cloud–edge environments10.1016/j.future.2024.03.041 ↗
33. Böhm, S., and Wirtz, G. (2021, January 25–26). Profiling Lightweight Container Platforms: MicroK8s and K3s in Comparison to Kubernetes. Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Services and their Composition (ZEUS 2021), Bamberg, Germany.
34. (2022). Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Information Security Management Systems—Requirements (Standard No. ISO 27001).
35. Kumari, P., Dubey, V., and Shrivastava, S. (2023, January 29–30). Content Replica Placement Method for Fault Tolerance in Fog Computing Environment. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC), Sonbhadra, India.10.1109/AIC57670.2023.10263929 ↗
36. Intelligent Fault-Tolerant Mechanism for Data Centers of Cloud Infrastructure