Adaptive Control for a Robotic Bipedal Device Using a Hybrid Discrete-Continuous Reinforcement Learning Strategy
Source abstract
Abstract
This research develops and implements a novel reinforcement learning (RL) architecture to address the trajectory-tracking problem in bipedal robotic systems under articulated-joint constraints. The proposed RL framework extends previously designed adaptive controllers characterized by state-dependent gain structures. The learning mechanism comprises two hierarchical adaptation layers: the first employs an adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) formulation to approximate the Bellman value function using a class of continuous-time dynamic neural networks. In contrast, the second uses an iterative optimization scheme based on the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm. The resulting control strategy minimizes a robust performance index defined over the tracking trajectories of a system with uncertain and nonlinear dynamics representative of bipedal locomotion. The dynamic programming formulation ensures robustness to bounded parametric uncertainties and external perturbations. By approximating the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) value function using neural network structures, a closed-loop controller design is systematically established. Numerical simulations demonstrate the convergence of the tracking error to a region centered at the origin with a size that depends on the approximation quality of the selected neural network. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a conventional state-feedback control design is adopted as a benchmark, revealing that the suggested method produces a lower cumulative tracking error norm (0.023 vs. 0.037 rad·s) in the trajectory-tracking control problem for all robotic joints while simultaneously reducing the control effort required to complete motion tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics · Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Technology, University of Kentucky, Paducah, KY 42002, USA
Department of Automatic Control, Centro de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados, Gustavo A Madero, Mexico City 74368, Mexico
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Institute of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Manufacuring, Guadalajara 45210, Jalisco, Mexico
Funding
Tecnologico de Monterrey Challenge-Based Research Program
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Sandakalum, T., and Ang, M.H. (2022). Motion planning for mobile manipulators—A systematic review. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10020097 ↗
2. Motions of a rimless spoked wheel: A simple three-dimensional system with impacts10.1080/02681119708806242 ↗
3. Vukobratović, M., Borovac, B., Surla, D., and Stokić, D. (1990). Control and Stability. Biped Locomotion: Dynamics, Stability, Control and Application, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-83006-8 ↗
4. Chevallereau, C., Bessonnet, G., Abba, G., and Aoustin, Y. (2013). Bipedal Robots: Modeling, Design and Walking Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons.
5. Mikolajczyk, T., Mikołajewska, E., Al-Shuka, H.F., Malinowski, T., Kłodowski, A., Pimenov, D.Y., Paczkowski, T., Hu, F., Giasin, K., and Mikołajewski, D. (2022). Recent advances in bipedal walking robots: Review of gait, drive, sensors and control systems. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22124440 ↗
6. Modeling, stability and control of biped robots—A general framework10.1016/j.automatica.2004.01.031 ↗
7. Bipedal Robots: A Systematic Review of Dynamical Models, Balance Control Strategies, and Locomotion Methods
8. A brief review of dynamics and control of underactuated biped robots10.1080/01691864.2017.1308270 ↗
9. First steps towards translating HZD control of bipedal robots to decentralized control of exoskeletons10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2690407 ↗
10. An overview on bipedal gait control methods10.1049/cim2.12080 ↗
11. Collins, S.H., and Ruina, A. (2005, January 18–22). A bipedal walking robot with efficient and human-like gait. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain.
12. Gil, C.R., Calvo, H., and Sossa, H. (2019). Learning an efficient gait cycle of a biped robot based on reinforcement learning and artificial neural networks. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9030502 ↗
13. Li, Z., Cheng, X., Peng, X.B., Abbeel, P., Levine, S., Berseth, G., and Sreenath, K. (June, January 30). Reinforcement learning for robust parameterized locomotion control of bipedal robots. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Xi’an, China.10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9560769 ↗
14. Comparative analysis of reinforcement learning algorithms for bipedal robot locomotion10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3344393 ↗
15. Lyu, S., Lang, X., Zhao, H., Zhang, H., Ding, P., and Wang, D. (2024, January 15–19). Rl2ac: Reinforcement learning-based rapid online adaptive control for legged robot robust locomotion. Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems, Delft, The Netherlands.10.15607/RSS.2024.XX.060 ↗
16. A multiobjective collaborative deep reinforcement learning algorithm for jumping optimization of bipedal robot10.1002/aisy.202300352 ↗
17. Improving Bipedal Robot Motion via Reinforcement Learning and Tailored Rewards
18. Hybrid autonomous controller for bipedal robot balance with deep reinforcement learning and pattern generators10.1016/j.robot.2021.103891 ↗
19. Wang, Z., Wei, W., Xie, A., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., and Zhu, Q. (2022). Hybrid bipedal locomotion based on reinforcement learning and heuristics. Micromachines, 13.10.3390/mi13101688 ↗
20. Huo, Y., Gang, S., and Guan, C. (2023). FCIHMRT: Feature cross-layer interaction hybrid method based on Res2Net and transformer for remote sensing scene classification. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12204362 ↗
21. Fuzzy double deep Q-network-based gait pattern controller for humanoid robots10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3033141 ↗
22. Hybrid reinforcement learning for optimal control of non-linear switching system10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3156287 ↗
23. Hybrid control for combining model-based and model-free reinforcement learning10.1177/02783649221083331 ↗
24. Melinte, D.O., and Vladareanu, L. (2020). Facial expressions recognition for human–robot interaction using deep convolutional neural networks with rectified adam optimizer. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20082393 ↗
25. Trajectory generation and control of a lower limb exoskeleton for gait assistance10.1007/s10846-022-01763-5 ↗
26. Gait reference trajectory generation at different walking speeds using LSTM and CNN10.1007/s11042-023-14733-2 ↗
27. Dynamic Simulation of a 12 DoF Biped Robot with Newton-Euler Method using Unit Vector Approach10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.133 ↗
28. Stability Control of Humanoid Biped Robot using PID controllers10.15282/mekatronika.v5i1.9416 ↗
29. Deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm: A systematic review10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30697 ↗
30. Tan, H. (2021, January 28–30). Reinforcement learning with deep deterministic policy gradient. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Algorithms (CAIBDA), Xi’an, China.10.1109/CAIBDA53561.2021.00025 ↗
31. Wang, Y., and Zou, S. (2022, January 17–23). Policy gradient method for robust reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Baltimore, MA, USA.
32. Strict Lyapunov functions for the super-twisting algorithm10.1109/TAC.2012.2186179 ↗
33. Robust exact uniformly convergent arbitrary order differentiator10.1016/j.automatica.2013.04.034 ↗
34. Neumann, D.A. (2013). Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System-e-Book: Foundations for Rehabilitation, Elsevier Health Sciences.