Interfacial Evaluation of Wind Blade Carbon Spar-Cap Depending on Elimination Method of Intermediate Medium
Source abstract
Abstract
An Ultrasonic Test (UT), a type of non-destructive test, is used to inspect the manufacturing integrity of carbon spar-caps of wind blades. When performing a UT, an intermediate medium is used to improve the signal detection ability between the inspection target and the probe. However, if the intermediate-medium residue is not removed, it acts as a contaminant in the interface between the spar-cap and the blade skin. This has a negative effect on the adhesion characteristics. A quantitative method is required for removing the intermediate medium and peel ply after the UT. After the UT, the interfacial characteristics of the spar-cap surface are examined according to the method of removing the intermediate medium in this study. The static contact angle and the work of adhesion (Wa) were measured according to various surface treatment conditions. In addition, shear strength of the Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) spar-cap was evaluated by the lap shear test. An optimized method of peel-ply removal combined with an intermediate medium was found in this study. An optimal guideline for intermediate-medium treatment could be proposed when evaluating the manufacturing integrity of real wind blade spar-caps using UT.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Icing and De-icing Technologies · Wind Energy Research and Development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Miryong-dong, Gunsan 54150, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea
Department of Wind Energy, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Miryong-dong, Gunsan 54150, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea
Defense and Safety Protection Reliability Assessment Center, Korea Institute of Convergence Textile, Iksan 54588, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Economic competitiveness of pultruded fiber composites for wind turbine applications10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110960 ↗
2. Chen, C.-H., and Su, N.-J. (2022). Global Trends and Characteristics of Offshore Wind Farm Research over the Past Three Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10101339 ↗
3. Mishnaevsky, L., Branner, K., Petersen, H.N., Beauson, J., McGugan, M., and Sørensen, B.F. (2017). Materials for Wind Turbine Blades: An Overview. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10111285 ↗
4. A concept study of a carbon spar cap design for a 80m wind turbine blade10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012039 ↗
5. Failure analysis of a composite wind turbine blade at the adhesive joint of the trailing edge10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105148 ↗
6. Study on the Effect of Different Delamination Defects on Buckling Behavior of Spar Cap in Wind Turbine Blade10.1155/2020/6979636 ↗
7. Mishnaevsky, L. (2022). Root Causes and Mechanisms of Failure of Wind Turbine Blades: Overview. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15092959 ↗
8. Latent cure epoxy resins for reliable joints in secondary-bonded composite structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109603 ↗
9. Investigation of the dynamic characteristics of a carbon-fiber-reinforced epoxy with adhesive-jointed structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112499 ↗
10. A Case Study on Damage Detection of Wind turbine Composite Blade10.5937/fmet1901135S ↗
11. Dachev, D., Kazilas, M., Alfano, G., and Omairey, S. (2025). Towards Reliable Adhesive Bonding: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms, Defects, and Design Considerations. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122724 ↗
12. Grease-like coupling agent based on metal ionization method for low-frequency ultrasonic NDT10.1016/j.rinp.2019.01.084 ↗
13. Environmental Failure of Structural Adhesive Joints10.1080/00218467408075035 ↗
14. Nondestructive testing of contaminated CFRP surfaces with the BonNDTinspect® system10.1186/s40563-017-0093-9 ↗
15. Surface contamination effects on film adhesion on metals and organic polymers10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.027 ↗
16. Determination of adhesion strength of pre-bond contaminated composite-to-metal bonded joints by centrifuge tests10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.014 ↗
17. Review on the effect of moisture and contamination on the interfacial properties of adhesive joints10.1177/0954406220944208 ↗
18. Influence of different contaminants and cleansing agents on bond strength and in situ degree of conversion of composite-adhesive interface10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102932 ↗
19. Ablation treatment of CFRP via nanosecond pulsed Ytterbium-doped fiber laser: Effects of process parameters on surface morphology and shear strength of adhesive bonded joints10.1016/j.jajp.2024.100270 ↗
20. Enhancing the shear strength of adhesive bonded compression-molded CFRP laminates using selective UV picosecond laser treatment10.1007/s00170-025-16985-8 ↗
21. The peel ply surface treatment for adhesive bonding of composites: A review10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.014 ↗
22. Evaluation of Peel Ply Effectiveness in Controlling Mould Release Agent Contamination of Epoxy/Carbon Fibre Composite Laminate Surfaces10.24425/amm.2024.151430 ↗
23. Analysis of the removal of peel ply from CFRP surfaces10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.019 ↗
24. Comparison on Accuracy of Static and Dynamic Contact Angle Methods for Evaluating Interfacial Properties of Composites
25. The effect of material and process parameters on the surface energy of polycaprolactone fibre layers10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109748 ↗
26. Chen, Q., Du, B., Zhang, X., Zhong, H., Ning, C., Bai, H., Li, Q., Pan, R., Zhou, B., and Hu, H. (2022). Parametric Investigation into the Shear Strength of Adhesively Bonded Single-Lap Joints. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15228013 ↗
27. Effects of environmental conditions on the lap shear strength of resistance-welded carbon fibre/thermoplastic composite joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108239 ↗
28. Interfacial and wetting properties between glass fiber and epoxy resins with different pot lifes10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.02.017 ↗
29. Polar interactions at liquid/polymer interfaces10.1163/156856107781393875 ↗
30. Formentín, P., and Marsal, L.F. (2021). Hydrophobic/Oleophilic Structures Based on MacroPorous Silicon: Effect of Topography and Fluoroalkyl Silane Functionalization on Wettability. Nanomaterials, 11.10.3390/nano11030670 ↗
31. Young-Dupre Revisited10.1021/la00009a049 ↗
32. Analysis for determining surface free energy uncertainty by the Owen–Wendt method10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.008 ↗
33. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers10.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
34. Yang, S.B., Woo, M.J., Lee, D., Kim, J.-H., Nam, S.Y., and Kwon, D.-J. (2025). Mechanical and Anti-Icing Properties of Polyurethane/Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites with Carbonized Coffee Grounds. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18194533 ↗
35. Effect of brine composition on the surface energy of calcite and adhesion of oil: Implications for the wettability of limestone rocks10.1016/j.molliq.2025.128606 ↗
36. (2017). Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesively Bonded Plastic Lap-Shear Sandwich Joints in Shear by Tension Loading (Standard No. ASTM D3164-03).
37. (2019). Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single-Lap-Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal) (Standard No. ASTM D1002-10(2019)).
38. Redmann, A., Damodaran, V., Tischer, F., Prabhakar, P., and Osswald, T.A. (2021). Evaluation of Single-Lap and Block Shear Test Methods in Adhesively Bonded Composite Joints. J. Compos. Sci., 5.10.3390/jcs5010027 ↗
39. Interfacial properties and water resistance of epoxy and CNT-epoxy adhesives on GFRP composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.026 ↗
40. Comparative study on the surface free energy of a solid calculated by different methods10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.08.005 ↗
41. A study on the evaluation of adhesive performance for improving wind blade manufacturing reliability
42. Disarmament of micropollutants from wastewater using nylon waste/chitosan blended with algal biomass as recoverable membrane10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107381 ↗
43. A simple and novel method to design flexible and transparent epoxy resin with tunable mechanical properties10.1002/pi.5144 ↗
44. Environmentally assisted crack growth in adhesively bonded composite joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.018 ↗