Ground-Type Classification from Earth-Pressure-Balance Shield Operational Data with Uncertainty Quantification
Source abstract
Abstract
In urban underground space construction using shield tunnelling, the geological conditions ahead of the tunnel face are often uncertain. Without timely and accurate classification of the ground type, mismatches in operational parameters, uncontrolled costs, and schedule risks are likely to occur. Using observations from an earth pressure balance (EPB) project on an urban railway, a data-driven classification framework is developed that integrates shield tunnelling operating measurements with physically derived quantities to discriminate among soft soil, hard rock, and mixed strata. Principal component analysis (PCA) is performed on the training set, followed by a systematic comparison of tree-based classifiers and hyperparameter optimization strategies to explore the attainable performance. Under unified evaluation criteria, a categorical bosting (CatBoost) model optimized by a Nevergrad combination strategy (NGOpt) attains the highest test accuracy of 0.9625, with macro-averaged precision and macro-averaged recall of 0.9715 and 0.9716, respectively. To mitigate optimism from single-point estimates, stratified bootstrap intervals are reported for the test set. A Monte Carlo experiment applies independent perturbations to the PCA-transformed features, producing low label-flip rates across the three classes, with only minor changes in probability calibration metrics, which suggests consistent decisions under sensor noise and sampling bias. Overall, within the scope of the considered EPB project, the study delivers a compact workflow that demonstrates the feasibility of uncertainty-aware ground-type classification and provides a methodological reference for developing decision-support tools in underground tunnel construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Institute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012 ↗
2. Development of urban underground space in coastal cities in China: A review10.1002/dug2.12034 ↗
3. Guglielmetti, V., Grasso, P., Mahtab, A., and Xu, S. (2008). Mechanized Tunnelling in Urban Areas: Design Methodology and Construction Control, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203938515 ↗
4. Maidl, B., Herrenknecht, M., Maidl, U., and Wehrmeyer, G. (2012). Mechanised Shield Tunnelling, Ernst & Sohn. [2nd ed.].10.1002/9783433601051 ↗
5. Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields10.1016/0886-7798(96)00017-X ↗
6. Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling10.1007/s12205-014-0023-3 ↗
7. Soil conditioning in EPB shield tunnelling—An overview of laboratory tests10.1002/geot.201900021 ↗
8. Experimental study on the influences of cutter geometry and material on scraper wear during shield TBM tunnelling in abrasive sandy ground10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.10.009 ↗
9. Cutter-disc consumption during earth-pressure-balance tunnelling in mixed strata10.1680/jgeen.17.00117 ↗
10. Prediction of lateral continuous wear of cutter ring in soft ground with quartz sand10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.07.015 ↗
11. Mucha, K. (2023). Application of rock abrasiveness and rock abrasivity test methods—A review. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151411243 ↗
12. A practical TBM cutter wear prediction model for disc cutter life and rock wear ability10.1016/j.tust.2018.12.010 ↗
13. An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.011 ↗
14. Geological prediction ahead of tunnel face in limestone formation tunnel using multi-modal geophysical surveys10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012114 ↗
15. Abate, G., Catalano, E., Ippolito, F., and Spagnoli, G. (2022). An early-warning system to validate the soil profile during TBM tunnelling by applying the HVSR method to TBM-induced microtremors. Geosciences, 12.10.3390/geosciences12030113 ↗
16. Yang, T., Wen, T., Huang, X., Liu, B., Shi, H., Liu, S., Peng, X., and Sheng, G. (2024). Predicting Model of Dual-Mode Shield Tunneling Parameters in Complex Ground Using Recurrent Neural Networks and Multiple Optimization Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020581 ↗
17. Development and in-situ application of a real-time monitoring system for the interaction between TBM and surrounding rock10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.018 ↗
18. Liu, J., Li, S., Wang, Y., Wang, X., and Sun, Z. (2020). Application of specific energy in evaluation of geological conditions ahead of tunnel face. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13040909 ↗
19. Cardu, M., Coragliotto, M., Oreste, P., and Papini, M. (2021). Performance analysis of tunnel boring machines for rock excavation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.20944/preprints202102.0600.v1 ↗
20. Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Li, X., and Lin, J. (2023). Performance evaluation of TBM using an improved load reversal method. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11020141 ↗
21. The concept of specific energy in rock drilling10.1016/0148-9062(65)90022-7 ↗
22. Characterizing the as-encountered ground condition with tunnel boring machine data using semi-supervised learning10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105159 ↗
23. Data-driven intelligent prediction of TBM surrounding rock and personalized evaluation of disaster-inducing factors10.1016/j.tust.2024.105768 ↗
24. Huang, Y., Hu, X., Pang, S., Fu, W., Chang, S., Gao, B., and Hua, W. (2025). TBM enclosure rock grade prediction method based on multi-source feature fusion. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15126684 ↗
25. Theoretical considerations of field penetration index model and its application in TBM performance prediction10.1007/s40948-023-00603-6 ↗
26. Sun, M., Chen, S., He, H., Wang, W., Song, K., and Lin, X. (2024). Classification and prediction of rock mass drillability for a tunnel boring machine based on operational data mining. Front. Earth Sci., 12.10.3389/feart.2024.1518844 ↗
27. An empirical method for estimating TBM penetration rate using tunnelling specific energy10.1016/j.tust.2023.105525 ↗
28. Prediction of geological conditions for a tunnel boring machine using big operational data10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.022 ↗
29. A Data-Driven Framework for Tunnel Geological-Type Prediction Based on TBM Operating Data10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917756 ↗
30. An ANN to predict ground condition ahead of tunnel face using TBM operational data10.1007/s12205-019-1460-9 ↗
31. Prediction model of rock mass class using classification and regression tree integrated AdaBoost algorithm based on TBM driving data10.1016/j.tust.2020.103595 ↗
32. Prediction of Geological Parameters during Tunneling by Time Series Analysis on In Situ Data10.1155/2021/3904273 ↗
33. Rock mass type prediction for tunnel boring machine using a novel semi-supervised method10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109545 ↗
34. Real-time prediction of rock mass classification based on TBM operation big data and stacking technique of ensemble learning10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.05.004 ↗
35. Prediction of geological characteristics from shield operational parameters by integrating grid search and K-fold cross validation into stacking classification algorithm10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.03.002 ↗
36. Data on prediction of geological characteristics during shield tunnelling in mixed soil and rock ground10.1016/j.dib.2022.108726 ↗
37. Data-driven real-time advanced geological prediction in tunnel construction using a hybrid deep learning approach10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104672 ↗
38. Time series clustering-enabled geological condition perception in tunnel boring machine excavation10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104954 ↗
39. Machine Learning Approach for Rock Mass Classification with Imbalanced Database of TBM Tunnelling in Himalayan Geology10.1007/s00603-024-04212-x ↗
40. Random large-deformation modelling on face stability considering dynamic excavation process during tunnelling through spatially variable soils
41. CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features
42. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization
43. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD’19), Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
44. INFO: An efficient optimization algorithm based on weighted mean of vectors10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116516 ↗
45. Improving Nevergrad’s algorithm selection wizard NGOpt through automated algorithm configuration10.1007/978-3-031-14714-2_2 ↗
46. Refined Approaches for Open Stope Stability Analysis in Mining Environments: Hybrid SVM Model with Multi-Optimization Strategies and GP Technique10.1007/s00603-024-04055-6 ↗
47. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
48. Comparison of Values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data
49. Ma, T., Jin, Y., Liu, Z., and Prasad, Y.K. (2022). Research on Prediction of TBM Performance of Deep-Buried Tunnel Based on Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136599 ↗
50. Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components10.1037/h0071325 ↗
51. Principal Component Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 ↗
52. A Systematic Analysis of Performance Measures for Classification Tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
53. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth.
54. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
55. Extremely Randomized Trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
56. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
57. Predictive Learning via Rule Ensembles10.1214/07-AOAS148 ↗
58. An Introduction to ROC Analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
59. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife10.1214/aos/1176344552 ↗
60. Field Monitoring of TBM Vibration During Excavating Changing Stratum: Patterns and Ground Identification10.1007/s00603-021-02714-6 ↗
61. The Monte Carlo Method10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
62. Niculescu-Mizil, A., and Caruana, R. (2005, January 7–11). Predicting Good Probabilities with Supervised Learning. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2005), Bonn, Germany.10.1145/1102351.1102430 ↗
63. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 6–11). On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2017), Sydney, Australia.