A Hybrid Fuzzy WINGS–TOPSIS Model for the Assessment of Execution Errors in Reinforced Concrete Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Reinforced concrete structures constitute a fundamental component of modern construction; however, the execution process is highly susceptible to construction errors that may reduce the safety and durability of structural elements. Despite numerous studies addressing failures and degradation mechanisms, there is a lack of methods enabling quantitative, multi-criteria assessment of the significance of individual execution errors. The aim of this article is to identify, evaluate, and prioritize execution errors occurring during the construction of reinforced concrete structures, considering their impact on safety, durability, and repair costs. A hybrid decision-making model combining the fuzzy WINGS and fuzzy TOPSIS methods was developed to enable the assessment of execution errors under uncertainty. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the application of a hybrid fuzzy approach to the evaluation of construction errors in reinforced concrete works, allowing for the simultaneous consideration of criterion importance and the intrinsic ambiguity of expert judgments. Fuzzy WINGS was used to determine the criterion weights, while fuzzy TOPSIS facilitated the development of error rankings. Within the reinforcement-related errors, the most critical were the following: insufficient concrete cover (0.89), non-compliant reinforcement layout (0.82), and reinforcement discontinuity (0.81). Among formwork errors, the highest importance was assigned to exceeding permissible geometric deviations (0.94), while for concreting errors, the most significant were discontinuity of concreting (0.35) and improper technological joints (0.34). The proposed model provides a practical decision support tool for technical supervision, quality management, and risk assessment in reinforced concrete construction. Due to the universal structure of the hybrid fuzzy WINGS–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology itself, the approach may also be adapted in future research to other decision-making problems, should their nature justify the use of fuzzy multi-criteria methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Construction Engineering and Safety · Construction Project Management and Performance · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, Kielce University of Technology, Al. 1000-lecia PP 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
MB BUD Bracha Mateusz, 25-408 Kielce, Poland
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Buitrago, M., Moragues, J.J., Calderón, P.A., and Adam, J.M. (2018). Chapter 8—Structural Failures in Cast-in-Place Reinforced Concrete Building Structures under Construction. Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis, Elsevier Ltd.10.1016/B978-0-08-101928-3.00008-2 ↗
2. Statistical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Defects for Optimum Maintenance Planning and Budgeting10.1051/matecconf/20168306001 ↗
3. Avoiding Failures during Building Construction Using Structural Fuses as Load Limiters on Temporary Shoring Structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109906 ↗
4. Assessment of Construction Errors in Execution of Reinforced Concrete T-Beams
5. An Investigation on Failed or Damaged Reinforced Concrete Structures under Their Own-Weight in Turkey10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.005 ↗
6. Kung, P. (2014). Fiber Optic Sensors to Monitor Reinforced Concrete Corrosion. SPIE Newsroom.10.1117/2.1201404.005448 ↗
7. Operational problems in structural nodes of reinforced concrete constructions10.1088/1757-899X/603/3/032096 ↗
8. Strengthening and Repair of a Precast Reinforced Concrete Residential Building10.28991/cej-2020-03091630 ↗
9. Reliability Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Slabs Designed According to NBR 6118
10. Janowska-Renkas, E., Jakiel, P., and Fabianowski, D. (2021). Optimal Selection of High-Performance Concrete for Post-Tensioned Girder Bridge Using Advanced Hybrid MCDA Method. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14216553 ↗
11. Du, Y., Korjakins, A., Sinka, M., and Pundien, I. (2024). Lifecycle Assessment and Multi-Parameter Optimization of Lightweight Cement Mortar with Nano Additives. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17174434 ↗
12. Mach, A., and Wałach, D. (2024). Implementation of Integrated Life Cycle Design Principles in Ground Improvement and Piling Methods—A Review. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16020659 ↗
13. Wang, J., Qin, Y., He, P., and Yan, W. (2025). Research on Smart Construction Site Evaluation Model Based on DEMATEL-ANP Method. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15173077 ↗
14. Ren, R., Hu, G., Fang, J., Tong, X., and Wang, C. (2025). Investment Risk Analysis of Municipal Railway Construction Projects Based on Improved SNA Methodology. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15224025 ↗
15. Gałek-Bracha, K. (2025). Sustainable Risk Management in Construction Through a Hybrid Fuzzy WINGS-ANP Method for Assessing Negative Impacts During Open Caisson Sinking. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17135848 ↗
16. Marović, I., Šopić, M., Jurčević, M., and Radojčić, R. (2025). Making Informed Choices: AHP and SAW for Optimal Formwork System Selection. Information, 16.10.3390/info16100873 ↗
17. Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 ↗
18. Prusak, A., and Stefanów, P. (2014). AHP-Analityczny Proces Hierarchiczny. Budowa i Analiza Modeli Decyzyjnych Krok Po Kroku, Wydawnictwo C.H.Beck.
19. Decision aid and decision making10.1016/0377-2217(90)90196-I ↗
20. Ekspercka Analiza Relacji Pomiędzy Różnoźródłowymi Ryzykami w Kontekście Wymagań Zrównoważonego Budownictwa
21. The Role of Fuzzy Logic in the Management of Uncertainty in Expert Systems10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80081-5 ↗
22. Dytczak, M. (2010). Wybrane Metody Rozwiązywania Wielokryterialnych Problemów Decyzyjnych w Budownictwie, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Opolskiej.
23. Weighted Influence Non-Linear Gauge System (WINGS)-An Analysis Method for the Systems of Interrelated Components10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.007 ↗
24. Konopka, P. (2021). Metody Wielokryterialnego Podejmowania Decyzji w Badaniu Ryzyka Finansowania Przedsiębiorstw, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
25. Michnik, J. (2013). Wielokryterialne Metody Wspomagania Decyzji w Procesie Innowacji, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
26. Hybrid Machine Learning and Multi-Objective Optimization for Intelligent Design of Green and Low-Carbon Concrete
27. Fuzzy Sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
28. Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Theory and Applications, Academic Press.
29. Operation of Fuzzy Numbers10.1080/00207727808941724 ↗
30. Kaufmann, A., and Gupta, M.M. (1985). Intorduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, Van Nostrand Reinold.
31. A Causal Analytical Method for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012 ↗
32. Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Identifying LMS Evaluation Criteria10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.304 ↗
33. Tzeng, G., and Huang, J. (2011). Multiaple Atribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
34. Hwang, C.-L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 ↗