Association Analysis of ADAS and ADS Accidents: A Comparative Study Based on Association Rule Mining
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the causes of traffic accidents involving Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) and their interdependencies. Using a source dataset comprising 3015 ADAS accident records and 1085 ADS accident records from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the study categorizes accident severity into four levels and applies association rule mining (ARM) to identify high-frequency risk factor combinations. Key risk factors include environmental, road, vehicle, and accident characteristics. Findings show that ADAS accidents are concentrated in highway straight-driving scenarios, strongly correlated with rainy weather, and often involve rear-end collisions due to delayed driver reactions. ADS accidents predominantly occur in intersection stopping scenarios, favor clear weather, and exhibit better safety performance in non-damage cases with Level 5 (L5) systems, though they still face perception and decision-making challenges in complex scenarios like nighttime wet roads. The study further reveals that vehicle design purpose (ADAS for highways, L5 for urban areas) strongly influences accident severity, with L5 systems reducing fatality risks through advanced perception but still affected by high speeds, extreme lighting, and system aging. Make attributes and technological maturity also significantly impact outcomes. This study provides insights for technological advancement, regulatory improvements, and human–machine collaboration optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, 579 Qianwangang Road Economic & Technical Development, Qingdao 266590, China
Funding
State Key Lab of Intelligent Transportation System · Postgraduate Quality Professional Degree Teaching Case Base
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2023). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023: Summary, World Health Organization.
2. (2024, July 13). Tesla: 2022 Q4 Quarterly Update. Tesla. Available online: https://digitalassets.tesla.com/tesla-contents/image/upload/IR/TSLA-Q4-2022-Update.
3. People’s Daily Online (2025, March 11). 2024 Intelligent Internet Blue Book: China’s Assisted Driving Passenger Car Market Penetration Rate Reaches 47.3%, People’s Daily Online, Available online: http://yjy.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0620/c244560-40260730.html.
4. Stewart, J. (2024, July 15). Why Tesla’s Autopilot Can’t See a Stopped Firetruck. Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-autopilot-why-crash-radar/.
5. Marshall, A. (2024, July 15). The Uber Crash Won’t Be the Last Shocking Self-Driving Death. Wired. Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/uber-self-driving-crash-explanation-lidar-sensors/.
6. (2021). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems (Standard No. SAE J3016™).
7. Causes and effects of autonomous vehicle field test crashes and disengagements using exploratory factor analysis, binary logistic regression, and decision trees10.1177/03611981221084677 ↗
8. Exploratory analysis of injury severity under different levels of driving automation (SAE Levels 2 and 4) using multi-source data10.1016/j.aap.2024.107692 ↗
9. Heterogeneity in crash patterns of autonomous vehicles: The latent class analysis coupled with multinomial logit model10.1016/j.aap.2024.107827 ↗
10. Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data10.1016/j.aap.2021.106537 ↗
11. How would autonomous vehicles behave in real-world crash scenarios?10.1016/j.aap.2024.107572 ↗
12. A comparative study of collision types between automated and conventional vehicles using Bayesian probabilistic inferences10.1016/j.jsr.2022.11.001 ↗
13. Channamallu, S.S., Kermanshachi, S., and Pamidimukkala, A. (2023, January 14–17). Impact of autonomous vehicles on traffic crashes in comparison with conventional vehicles. Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Transportation & Development, Austin, TX, USA.10.1061/9780784484876.005 ↗
14. Analysis of discretionary lane-changing behaviours of autonomous vehicles based on real-world data
15. Classification of autonomous vehicle crash severity: Solving the problems of imbalanced datasets and small sample size10.1016/j.aap.2024.107666 ↗
16. Extracting rules from autonomous-vehicle-involved crashes by applying decision tree and association rule methods10.1177/03611981211018461 ↗
17. Investigating collision patterns to support autonomous driving safety10.1080/17517575.2023.2243460 ↗
18. What can we learn from autonomous vehicle collision data on crash severity? A cost-sensitive CART approach10.1016/j.aap.2022.106769 ↗
19. Mining patterns of autonomous vehicle crashes involving vulnerable road users to understand the associated factors10.1016/j.aap.2021.106473 ↗
20. Kohanpour, E., Davoodi, S.R., and Shaaban, K. (2024). Analyzing autonomous vehicle collision types to support sustainable transportation systems: A machine learning and association rules approach. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16229893 ↗
21. Exploring the mechanism of crashes with autonomous vehicles using machine learning
22. What can we learn from the AV crashes?—An association rule analysis for identifying the contributing risky factors10.1016/j.aap.2024.107492 ↗
23. A matched case-control analysis of autonomous vs human-driven vehicle accidents10.1038/s41467-024-48526-4 ↗
24. Effects of advanced driver assistance systems on impact velocity and injury severity: An exploration of data from the crash investigation sampling system10.1177/03611981231189740 ↗
25. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study10.1080/15389588.2021.1979529 ↗
26. Expanding pedestrian injury risk to the body region level: How to model passive safety systems in pedestrian injury risk functions10.1080/15389588.2014.973490 ↗
27. Safety in higher-level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems10.1016/j.aap.2024.107607 ↗
28. Sinha, A., Vu, V., Chand, S., Wijayaratna, K., and Dixit, V. (2021). A crash injury model involving autonomous vehicle: Investigating crash and disengagement reports. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13147938 ↗
29. Exploratory investigation of disengagements and crashes in autonomous vehicles under mixed traffic: An endogenous switching regime framework10.1109/TITS.2020.3003527 ↗
30. Fast discovery of association rules
31. Identifying crash contributory factors at urban roundabouts and using association rules to explore their relationships to different crash types10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.023 ↗
32. Analysis of powered two-wheeler crashes in Italy by classification trees and rules discovery10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.025 ↗