Deep-Radiomic Fusion for Early Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Source abstract
Abstract
Leveraging the complementary strengths of handcrafted radiomics and data-driven deep learning, this work develops and rigorously benchmarks three modeling streams (Models A, B and C) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) detection on multiphase abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) scans. Model A distills hundreds of PyRadiomics descriptors to sixteen interpretable features that feed a gradient-boosted machine learning model, achieving discrimination (external AUC ≈ 0.99) with excellent calibration. Model B adopts a 3-D CBAM-ResNet-18 trained under weighted cross-entropy and mixed precision; although less accurate in isolation, it yields volumetric Grad-CAM maps that localize the tumor and provide explainability. Model C explores two fusion strategies that merge radiomics and deep embeddings: (i) a two-stage “frozen-stream” variant that locks both feature extractors and learns only a lightweight gating block plus classifier, and (ii) a full end-to-end version that allows the CNN’s adaptor layer to co-train with the fusion head. The frozen approach surpasses the single stream, whereas the end-to-end model reports external AUC of 0.987, balanced sensitivity/specificity above 0.93, and a Brier score below 0.05, while preserving clear Grad-CAM alignment with radiologist-drawn masks. Results demonstrate that a carefully engineered deep-radiomic fusion pipeline can deliver accurate, well-calibrated and interpretable PDAC triage directly from routine CT. Our contributions include a stability-verified 16-feature radiomic signature, a novel deep-radiomic fusion design that improves robustness and interpretability across vendors and a fully guideline-aligned, openly released pipeline for reproducible PDAC detection on routine CT.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MLV Research Group, Department of Informatics, Democritus University of Thrace, 65404 Kavala, Greece
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Cancer Statistics, 2024
2. Pancreatic Cancer10.1056/NEJMra0901557 ↗
3. Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Presentation, Pitfalls and Early Clues10.1093/annonc/10.suppl_4.S140 ↗
4. Introduction to Radiomics10.2967/jnumed.118.222893 ↗
5. Moumgiakmas, S.S., Vrochidou, E., and Papakostas, G.A. (2025). Mapping the Brain: AI-Driven Radiomic Approaches to Mental Disorders. Artif. Intell. Med., 168.10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103219 ↗
6. Nougaret, S., Tibermacine, H., Tardieu, M., and Sala, E. (2019). Radiomics: An Introductory Guide to What It May Foretell. Curr. Oncol. Rep., 21.10.1007/s11912-019-0815-1 ↗
7. Machine Learning in Medical Imaging10.1109/MSP.2010.936730 ↗
8. Radiomics with Artificial Intelligence: A Practical Guide for Beginners10.5152/dir.2019.19321 ↗
9. Bizzego, A., Bussola, N., Salvalai, D., Chierici, M., Maggio, V., Jurman, G., and Furlanello, C. (2019, January 9–11). Integrating Deep and Radiomics Features in Cancer Bioimaging. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), Siena, Italy.10.1109/CIBCB.2019.8791473 ↗
10. Lekkas, G., Vrochidou, E., and Papakostas, G.A. (2025). Advancements in Radiomics-Based AI for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12080849 ↗
11. Dmitriev, K., Kaufman, A.E., Javed, A.A., Hruban, R.H., Fishman, E.K., Lennon, A.M., and Saltz, J.H. (2017). Classification of Pancreatic Cysts in Computed Tomography Images Using a Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Network Ensemble. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2017, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_18 ↗
12. Ziegelmayer, S., Kaissis, G., Harder, F., Jungmann, F., Müller, T., Makowski, M., and Braren, R. (2020). Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Assisted Feature Extraction for Diagnostic Discrimination and Feature Visualization in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) versus Autoimmune Pancreatitis (AIP). J. Clin. Med., 9.10.3390/jcm9124013 ↗
13. Zhang, Y., Lobo-Mueller, E.M., Karanicolas, P., Gallinger, S., Haider, M.A., and Khalvati, F. (2021). Improving Prognostic Performance in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Radiomics and Deep Learning Features Fusion in CT Images. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-80998-y ↗
14. A Multidomain Fusion Model of Radiomics and Deep Learning to Discriminate between PDAC and AIP Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT Images10.1007/s11604-022-01363-1 ↗
15. Yao, L., Zhang, Z., Demir, U., Keles, E., Vendrami, C., Agarunov, E., Bolan, C., Schoots, I., Bruno, M., and Keswani, R. (2024). Radiomics Boosts Deep Learning Model for IPMN Classification. International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-45676-3_14 ↗
16. Vétil, R., Abi-Nader, C., Bône, A., Vullierme, M.-P., Rohé, M.-M., Gori, P., and Bloch, I. (2023). Non-Redundant Combination of Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics: Application to the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. MICCAI Workshop on Cancer Prevention Through Early Detection, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-45350-2_6 ↗
17. Gu, Q., Sun, H., Liu, P., Hu, X., Yang, J., Chen, Y., and Xing, Y. (2025). Multiscale Deep Learning Radiomics for Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Radiother. Oncol., 205.10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110770 ↗
18. Alves, N., Schuurmans, M., Rutkowski, D., Yakar, D., Haldorsen, I., Liedenbaum, M., Molven, A., Vendittelli, P., Litjens, G., and Hermans, J. (2025, July 27). The PANORAMA Study Protocol: Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis—Radiologists Meet AI. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/10599559.
19. Permutation Importance: A Corrected Feature Importance Measure10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
20. Lundberg, S., and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf.
21. Pinciroli Vago, N.O., Milani, F., Fraternali, P., and da Silva Torres, R. (2021). Comparing CAM Algorithms for the Identification of Salient Image Features in Iconography Artwork Analysis. J. Imaging, 7.10.3390/jimaging7070106 ↗
22. Kocak, B., Baessler, B., Bakas, S., Cuocolo, R., Fedorov, A., Maier-Hein, L., Mercaldo, N., Müller, H., Orlhac, F., and Pinto dos Santos, D. (2023). CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics Research (CLEAR): A Step-by-Step Reporting Guideline for Authors and Reviewers Endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII. Insights Imaging, 14.10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8 ↗
23. Kocak, B., Ponsiglione, A., Stanzione, A., Ugga, L., Klontzas, M.E., Cannella, R., and Cuocolo, R. (2024). CLEAR Guideline for Radiomics: Early Insights into Current Reporting Practices Endorsed by EuSoMII. Eur. J. Radiol., 181.10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111788 ↗
24. Assessment of RadiomIcS REsearch (ARISE): A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers from the Scientific Editorial Board of European Radiology10.1007/s00330-023-09768-w ↗
25. ESR Essentials: Radiomics—Practice Recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics10.1007/s00330-024-11093-9 ↗
26. Collins, G.S., Moons, K.G., Dhiman, P., Riley, R.D., Beam, A.L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J.B., and Van Smeden, M. (2024). TRIPOD + AI Statement: Updated Guidance for Reporting Clinical Prediction Models That Use Regression or Machine Learning Methods. BMJ, 385.10.1136/bmj-2023-078378 ↗
27. Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L.B., and Bourne, P.E. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. Sci. Data, 3.10.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
28. Tejani, A.S., Klontzas, M.E., Gatti, A.A., Mongan, J.T., Moy, L., Park, S.H., Kahn, C.E., Abbara, S., Afat, S., and Anazodo, U.C. (2024). Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update. Radiol. Artif. Intell., 6.10.1148/ryai.240300 ↗
29. Radiomics: The Bridge between Medical Imaging and Personalized Medicine10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 ↗
30. Kocak, B., Akinci D’Antonoli, T., Mercaldo, N., Alberich-Bayarri, A., Baessler, B., Ambrosini, I., Andreychenko, A.E., Bakas, S., Beets-Tan, R.G.H., and Bressem, K. (2024). METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): A Quality Scoring Tool for Radiomics Research Endorsed by EuSoMII. Insights Imaging, 15.10.1186/s13244-023-01572-w ↗