Influencing Factor Analysis Based on Jointly Modeling for Freeway Rear-End and Sideswipe Crashes Considering Spatial and Site Correlations
Source abstract
Abstract
As the primary collision patterns on China’s freeways, in-depth exploration of the influencing factors of rear-end and sideswipe crashes has long been crucial for implementing targeted countermeasures. However, the structural and traffic flow continuity of freeways endows crash data with complex spatial and site correlations, which—if neglected in safety modeling—can lead to biased estimates of safety effects. To address this issue, this study develops a bivariate conditional autoregressive (CAR) model based on the Poisson lognormal (PLN) distribution: the copula joint distribution captures the site correlation between the two crash types, while the CAR model addresses spatial correlations across adjacent segments. Compared with univariate models and bivariate models with jointly distributed residuals, the proposed model achieves optimal performance and reveals the distinct determinants of the two crash types. For instance, factors such as spiral curve length and mean speed affect both crash types but to varying degrees, while continuous horizontal curve length only influences rear-end crashes. The proposed model and the identified influencing factors provide significant support for engineers to improve road safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Traffic Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Science and Technology Department, Traffic Police Headquarters of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, Shanghai 200123, China
Shanghai Jinqiao Intelligent Connected Vehicle Development Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2023). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023, World Health Organization.
2. World Health Organization (2025, November 03). Road Traffic Injuries. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries.
3. The Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China (2020). Annual Report on Road Traffic Accident Statistics (2019), Traffic Management Science Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security.
4. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2025, November 03). Statistical Bulletin on the Development of the Transportation Industry in 2019, Available online: https://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/2020/jigou/zhghs/202006/t20200630_3321335.html.
5. Office of the State Council Leading Group on Safety Production (2025, November 03). Public Security System’s Three-Year Action Plan for Fundamental Safety Production (2024–2026), Available online: https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202402/content_6930470.htm.
6. Skaug, L., Nojoumian, M., Dang, N., and Yap, A. (2025). Road Crash Analysis and Modeling: A Systematic Review of Methods, Data, and Emerging Technologies. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15137115 ↗
7. Beijing News (2025, November 03). A Series of 29 Traffic Pile-Ups Occurred on the Shanxi Guoyang Section of the Erguang Expressway, Resulting in 1 Death and 6 Injuries. Available online: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1784952458455163219&wfr=spider&for=pc.
8. Identifying Crash Type Propensity Using Real-Time Traffic Data on Freeways10.1016/j.jsr.2011.01.001 ↗
9. Mao, X., Yuan, C., Gan, J., and Zhang, S. (2019). Risk Factors Affecting Traffic Accidents at Urban Weaving Sections: Evidence from China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16091542 ↗
10. Chen, F., Song, M., and Ma, X. (2019). Investigation on the Injury Severity of Drivers in Rear-End Collisions between Cars Using a Random Parameters Bivariate Ordered Probit Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16142632 ↗
11. Yang, B. (2020). Study on the Relationship Between Traffic Flow State and Crash Pattern on Freeway. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Southeast University].
12. Freeway Single and Multi-Vehicle Crash Safety Analysis: Influencing Factors and Hotspots10.1016/j.aap.2019.105268 ↗
13. Analyzing Freeway Crash Severity Using a Bayesian Spatial Generalized Ordered Logit Model with Conditional Autoregressive Priors10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.029 ↗
14. Jointly Analyzing Freeway Primary and Secondary Crash Severity Using a Copula-Based Approach10.1016/j.aap.2022.106911 ↗
15. Qi, W., Qin, S., Zhu, S., and Fu, C. (2025). A Random Parameter Bivariate Approach for Modelling Freeway Crash Frequency by Severity Level. Transp. A Transp. Sci., 2466471.10.1080/23249935.2025.2466471 ↗
16. Alsaleh, R., Walia, K., Moshiri, G., and Alsaleh, Y.T. (2025). Traffic Collision Severity Modeling Using Multi-Level Multinomial Logistic Regression Model. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15020838 ↗
17. Wang, J., Ma, S., Jiao, P., Ji, L., Sun, X., and Lu, H. (2023). Analyzing the Risk Factors of Traffic Accident Severity Using a Combination of Random Forest and Association Rules. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13148559 ↗
18. A Multivariate Heterogeneous-Dispersion Count Model for Asymmetric Interdependent Freeway Crash Types10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.008 ↗
19. Predicting Crash Frequency for Multi-Vehicle Collision Types Using Multivariate Poisson–Lognormal Spatial Model: A Comparative Analysis10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.003 ↗
20. Exploring Relationships between Months and Different Crash Types on Mountainous Freeways Using a Combined Modeling Approach10.1155/2022/6716275 ↗
21. Assessment of Fatal Rear-End Crash Risk Factors of an Expressway in India: A Random Parameter NB Modeling Approach10.1061/JTEPBS.0000767 ↗
22. Modeling Driver’s Evasive Behavior During Safety–Critical Lane Changes: Two-Dimensional Time-to-Collision and Deep Reinforcement Learning10.1016/j.aap.2023.107063 ↗
23. Applying a Random Parameters Negative Binomial Lindley Model to Examine Multi-Vehicle Crashes along Rural Mountainous Highways in Malaysia10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.006 ↗
24. Effects of Geometric Attributes of Horizontal and Sag Vertical Curve Combinations on Freeway Crash Frequency10.1016/j.aap.2023.107056 ↗
25. Xu, C., Gao, J., Zuo, F., and Ozbay, K. (2024). Estimating Urban Traffic Safety and Analyzing Spatial Patterns through the Integration of City-Wide Near-Miss Data: A New York City Case Study. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14146378 ↗
26. Multivariate Spatial Models of Excess Crash Frequency at Area Level: Case of Costa Rica10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.014 ↗
27. Multivariate Space–Time Modeling of Crash Frequencies by Injury Severity Levels
28. Wei, F., Cai, Z., Wang, Z., Guo, Y., Li, X., and Wu, X. (2021). Investigating Rural Single-Vehicle Crash Severity by Vehicle Types Using Full Bayesian Spatial Random Parameters Logit Model. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11177819 ↗
29. Spatial Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Models: Application for Estimating Frequencies of Rear-End Crashes on Thai Highways
30. Analysis of Freeway Crash Severity Based on Spatial Generalized Ordered Probit Model
31. An Analysis of the Impact of Injury Severity on Incident Clearance Time on Urban Interstates Using a Bivariate Random-Parameter Probit Model10.3390/stats7030052 ↗
32. Alanazi, F., Alruwaili, A., and Shtayat, A. (2025). MRI-Copula: A Hybrid Copula–Machine Learning Framework for Multivariate Risk Indexing in Urban Traffic Safety. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17209210 ↗
33. A Poisson Lognormal-Lindley Model for Simultaneous Estimation of Multiple Crash-Types: Application of Multivariate and Pooled Univariate Models
34. Copula-Based Bivariate Count Data Regression Models for Simultaneous Estimation of Crash Counts Based on Severity and Number of Vehicles10.1016/j.aap.2022.106928 ↗
35. Short-Term Safety Analysis and Interdependencies of Mixed-Operation Freeways with Fully Separated Express Lanes: A Copula-Based Poisson Lognormal Lindley Approach10.1016/j.aap.2025.108050 ↗
36. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2010). Highway Safety Manual, AASHTO. [1st ed.].
37. Estimating Mountainous Freeway Crash Rate: Application of a Spatial Model with Three-Dimensional (3D) Alignment Parameters10.1016/j.aap.2022.106634 ↗
38. A Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis of Road Traffic Crash by Severity Using Moran’s I Spatial Statistics: A Comparative Study of Addis Ababa and Berlin Cities10.1016/j.aap.2024.107535 ↗
39. (2025, November 03). BUGS User Manual—MultiBUGS v2.0. Available online: https://www.multibugs.org/documentation/latest/spatial/SpatialDistributions.html.
40. Bayesian Image Restoration, with Two Applications in Spatial Statistics10.1007/BF00116466 ↗
41. Fonctions de Répartition à N Dimensions et Leurs Marges
42. Nelsen, R.B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas, Springer.
43. Probability Density Decomposition for Conditionally Dependent Random Variables Modeled by Vines10.1023/A:1016725902970 ↗
44. A Copula-Based Approach for Jointly Modeling Crash Severity and Number of Vehicles Involved in Express Bus Crashes on Expressways Considering Temporal Stability of Data10.1016/j.aap.2020.105736 ↗
45. Analyzing Single-Vehicle and Multi-Vehicle Freeway Crashes with Unobserved Heterogeneity
46. General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 ↗
47. Multivariate Random Parameters Collision Count Data Models with Spatial Heterogeneity
48. Using Bus Critical Driving Events as Surrogate Safety Measures for Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes Based on GPS Trajectory Data10.1016/j.aap.2020.105924 ↗
49. Traffic Accident Prediction Based on LSTM–GBRT Model10.1155/2020/4206919 ↗
50. Multi-Level Bayesian Analyses for Single- and Multi-Vehicle Freeway Crashes10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.025 ↗
51. Bayesian Estimation of Hourly Exposure Functions by Crash Type and Time of Day10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.012 ↗
52. Phan, D.C., and Truong, L.T. (2024). Traffic Congestion and Safety: Mixed Effects on Total and Fatal Crashes. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16208911 ↗
53. Quantitative Causality Assessment between Traffic States and Crash Risk in Freeway Segments with Closely Spaced Entrance and Exit Ramps10.1016/j.physa.2024.129587 ↗