journal article·2025-12-10Open access

Quantifying the Multidimensional Benefits of Sustainable Shale Gas Development: A Copula–Monte Carlo Integrated Framework

Tianxiang Yang, Fan Wei, Ying Guo, Yuan Liang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 24

Abstract

Although shale gas is an important energy source in the energy transition, its development faces multidimensional challenges across economic, environmental, social and technological domains. Traditional evaluation methods struggle to quantify interdependencies among indicators or capture their overall benefits. To address this, we propose a sustainable development evaluation framework for shale gas that integrates 25 indicators across four dimensions: economic, environmental, social and technical. Entropy weighting is used to determine indicator weights, and principal component analysis (PCA) is applied to reduce dimensionality, Gaussian copula functions are then used to model inter-indicator dependencies, and Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) is used to quantify the distribution of comprehensive benefits under uncertainty. The key findings are as follows: (1) the environmental and technological dimensions carry the highest weights at 29% and 28%, respectively; (2) the PCA–Monte Carlo (PMC) development model achieves a comprehensive benefit score of 0.567, and 22% higher than the traditional model’s score of 0.467 with a 90% confidence interval of [2%, 46%]; and (3) sensitivity analysis identifies the most influential drivers as the hazardous waste compliance rate (impact coefficient 0.92), the community conflict resolution rate (0.367), and community satisfaction (0.26). The marginal benefits of environmental compliance and social governance substantially exceed those of traditional economic indicators, offering scientific guidance for the green transformation of the shale gas industry. The integrated PCA–copula–Monte Carlo framework also provides a methodological reference for the sustainable assessment of other unconventional resources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues · Global Energy and Sustainability Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Natural Gas Economic Research Institute, Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Chengdu 610051, China

College of Mathematical Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Shale Gas: A Review of the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability10.1002/ente.201500464 ↗
2. Shale gas: Will it become a new type of clean energy in China?—A perspective of development potential10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126257 ↗
3. Experiences and lessons learned from China’s shale gas development: 2005–201910.1016/j.jngse.2020.103648 ↗
4. Deep shale gas in China: Geological characteristics and development strategies10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.043 ↗
5. The economic impact of shale gas extraction: A review of existing studies10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.005 ↗
6. Regional economic impacts of the shale gas and tight oil boom: A synthetic control analysis10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.10.006 ↗
7. Shale gas development and regional economic growth: Evidence from Fuling, China10.1016/j.energy.2021.122254 ↗
8. Shale gas investment decision-making: Green and efficient development under market, technology and environment uncertainties10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118002 ↗
9. Economic evaluation and environmental assessment of shale gas dehydration process10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.361 ↗
10. Economic viability of UK shale gas and potential impacts on the energy market up to 203010.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.051 ↗
11. The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.026 ↗
12. Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum10.1021/es201942m ↗
13. Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: Response to Cathles et al. Clim
14. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of China shale gas10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104518 ↗
15. Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: A hybrid life cycle analysis10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.005 ↗
16. Environmental impacts from conventional and shale gas and oil development in China considering regional differences and well depth10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105368 ↗
17. Multiobjective Optimization Model for Minimizing Cost and Environmental Impact in Shale Gas Water and Wastewater Management10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00372 ↗
18. Life Cycle Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.685 ↗
19. Towards sustainable shale oil recovery in Jordan: An evaluation of renewable energy sources for in-situ extraction10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100446 ↗
20. Social sustainability assessment of shale gas in the UK10.1016/j.spc.2017.12.004 ↗
21. Deliberating the perceived risks, benefits, and societal implications of shale gas and oil extraction by hydraulic fracturing in the US and UK10.1038/nenergy.2017.54 ↗
22. Public health implications of environmental noise associated with unconventional oil and gas development10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.118 ↗
23. Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: A review of the current strength of evidence10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.084 ↗
24. Habib, S., Hinojosa, M.S., and Hinojosa, R. (2017). Societal Implications of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development. Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection, Elsevier.10.1016/bs.apmp.2017.08.001 ↗
25. Does shale gas exploitation contribute to regional sustainable development? Evidence from China10.1016/j.spc.2023.06.019 ↗
26. Deep shale gas exploration and development in the southern Sichuan Basin: New progress and challenges10.1016/j.ngib.2023.01.007 ↗
27. Shale oil and gas exploitation in China: Technical comparison with US and development suggestions10.1016/S1876-3804(23)60440-9 ↗
28. Progress and development directions of shale oil reservoir stimulation technology of China National Petroleum Corporation10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60102-7 ↗
29. Shukurov, A., Vovk, O., Zaporozhets, A., and Zuievska, N. (2024). Optimization of Technological Development of the Oil and Gas Industry. Geomining: Systems and Decision-Oriented Perspective, Springer Nature.
30. Shukurov, A., Vovk, O., Zaporozhets, A., and Zuievska, N. (2024). Geological Features and Type of Oil Shale Booth. Geomining: Systems and Decision-Oriented Perspective, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-70725-4 ↗
31. Green financial regulation and shale gas resources management10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103926 ↗
32. Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of shale gas development based on life cycle assessment10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104183 ↗
33. Techno-economic integration evaluation in shale gas development based on ensemble learning10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122486 ↗
34. Shale gas industry sustainability assessment based on WSR methodology and fuzzy matter-element extension model: The case study of China10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.346 ↗
35. Assessing the sustainability of the shale gas industry by combining DPSIRM model and RAGA-PP techniques: An empirical analysis of Sichuan and Chongqing, China10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.158 ↗
36. Evaluating the potential for sustainable development of China’s shale gas industry by combining multi-level DPSIR framework, PPFCI technique and RAGA algorithm10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146525 ↗
37. Sustainable development index of shale gas exploitation in China, the UK, and the US10.1016/j.ese.2022.100202 ↗
38. Integrated value of shale gas development: A comparative analysis in the United States and China10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.174 ↗
39. How to optimize the investment decision of shale gas multi-objective green development for energy sustainable development?10.1007/s13202-025-02084-7 ↗
40. Cherepovitsyn, A., Rutenko, E., and Solovyova, V. (2021). Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Resources: A System of Environmental, Socio-Economic, and Innovation Indicators. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9111307 ↗
41. Yang, X., Gu, A., Jiang, F., Xie, W., and Wu, Q. (2020). Integrated Assessment Modeling of China’s Shale Gas Resource: Energy System Optimization, Environmental Cobenefits, and Methane Risk. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14010053 ↗
42. Cooper, J. (2017). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Manchester].
43. Normalization: A preprocessing stage
44. Year in review—EROI or energy return on (energy) invested10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05282.x ↗
45. Linsel, A., Wiesler, S., Haas, J., Bär, K., and Hinderer, M. (2020). Accounting for Local Geological Variability in Sequential Simulations—Concept and Application. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9060409 ↗