Adaptive Volcano Support Vector Machine (AVSVM) for Efficient Malware Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we propose the Adaptive Volcano Support Vector Machine (AVSVM)—a novel classification model inspired by the dynamic behavior of volcanic eruptions—for the purpose of enhancing malware detection. Unlike conventional SVMs that rely on static decision boundaries, AVSVM introduces biologically inspired mechanisms such as pressure estimation, eruption-triggered kernel perturbation, lava flow-based margin refinement, and an exponential cooling schedule. These components work synergistically to enable real-time adjustment of the decision surface, allowing the classifier to escape local optima, mitigate class overlap, and stabilize under high-dimensional, noisy, and imbalanced data conditions commonly found in malware detection tasks. Extensive experiments were conducted on the UNSW-NB15 and KDD Cup 1999 datasets, comparing AVSVM to baseline classifiers including traditional SVM, PSO-SVM, and CNN under identical computational settings. On the UNSW-NB15 dataset, AVSVM achieved an accuracy of 96.7%, recall of 95.4%, precision of 96.1%, F1-score of 95.75%, and a false positive rate of only 3.1%, outperforming all benchmarks. Similar improvements were observed on the KDD dataset. In addition, AVSVM demonstrated smooth convergence behavior and statistically significant gains (p < 0.05) across all pairwise comparisons. These results validate the effectiveness of incorporating biologically motivated adaptivity into classical margin-based classifiers and position AVSVM as a promising tool for intelligent malware detection systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Altinbas University, Mahmutbey, Dilmenler Cd. No: 26, Bağcılar, Istanbul 34217, Turkey
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey on evolutionary computation for complex continuous optimization10.1007/s10462-021-10042-y ↗
2. A critical review of moth-flame optimization algorithm and its variants: Structural reviewing, performance evaluation, and statistical analysis10.1007/s11831-023-10037-8 ↗
3. Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142859 ↗
4. Guo, H., Wu, L., Wang, X., Xing, X., Zhang, J., Qing, S., and Zhao, X. (2024). Optimization of Support Vector Machine with Biological Heuristic Algorithms for Estimation of Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Using Limited Meteorological Data in China. Agronomy, 14.10.3390/agronomy14081780 ↗
5. Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for solving real-world mechanical engineering design problems: A comprehensive survey, applications, comparative analysis, and results10.1007/s00521-021-06747-4 ↗
6. Intrusion Detection for Wireless Sensor Network Using Particle Swarm Optimization Based Explainable Ensemble Machine Learning Approach10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3528341 ↗
7. Mutambik, I. (2024). Enhancing IoT Security Using GA-HDLAD: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Anomaly Detection. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14219848 ↗
8. Kamal, H., and Mashaly, M. (2025). Robust Intrusion Detection System Using an Improved Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Binary and Multi-Class Classification in IoT Networks. Technologies, 13.10.3390/technologies13030102 ↗
9. Dini, P., Elhanashi, A., Begni, A., Saponara, S., Zheng, Q., and Gasmi, K. (2023). Overview on Intrusion Detection Systems Design Exploiting Machine Learning for Networking Cybersecurity. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137507 ↗
10. Nassreddine, G., Nassereddine, M., and Al-Khatib, O. (2025). Ensemble Learning for Network Intrusion Detection Based on Correlation and Embedded Feature Selection Techniques. Computers, 14.10.3390/computers14030082 ↗
11. Jaw, E., and Wang, X. (2021). Feature Selection and Ensemble-Based Intrusion Detection System: An Efficient and Comprehensive Approach. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13101764 ↗
12. Alrowais, F., Marzouk, R., Nour, M.K., Mohsen, H., Hilal, A.M., Yaseen, I., Alsaid, M.I., and Mohammed, G.P. (2022). Intelligent Intrusion Detection Using Arithmetic Optimization Enabled Density Based Clustering with Deep Learning. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11213541 ↗
13. Devine, M., Ardakani, S.P., Al-Khafajiy, M., and James, Y. (2025). Federated Machine Learning to Enable Intrusion Detection Systems in IoT Networks. Electronics, 14.10.3390/electronics14061176 ↗
14. Lstm-based intrusion detection system for in-vehicle can bus communications10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029307 ↗
15. Sopa-ga-cnn: Synchronous optimisation of parameters and architectures by genetic algorithms with convolutional neural network blocks for securing industrial internet-of-things10.1049/csy2.12085 ↗
16. A reliable network intrusion detec- tion approach using decision tree with enhanced data quality10.1155/2021/1230593 ↗
17. An effective intrusion detection approach based on ensemble learning for iiot edge computing10.1007/s11416-022-00456-9 ↗
18. An efficient network intrusion detection model for iot security using k-nn classifier and feature selection10.1007/s11042-023-14795-2 ↗
19. Differential evolution- based convolutional neural networks: An automatic architecture design method for intrusion detection in industrial control systems10.1016/j.cose.2023.103310 ↗
20. Alkharsan, A., and Ata, O. (2025). HawkFish Optimization Algorithm: A Gender-Bending Approach for Solving Complex Optimization Problems. Electronics, 14.10.3390/electronics14030611 ↗
21. An improved anomaly detection model for iot security using decision tree and gradient boosting10.1007/s11227-022-04783-y ↗
22. Lids-sioel: Intrusion detection frame- work for iot-based smart environments security using ensemble learning10.1007/s10586-022-03810-0 ↗
23. Experimental setup for online fault diagnosis of induction machines via promising iot and machine learning: Towards industry 4.0 empowerment10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3105297 ↗
24. Breslin, J.G., and Intizar, M.A. (2022). Prediction of machine failure in industry 4.0: A hybrid ocnn-lstm framework. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094221 ↗
25. Cybersecurity for industry 4.0 in the current literature: A reference framework10.1016/j.compind.2018.09.004 ↗