Multiple Large AI Models’ Consensus for Object Detection—A Survey
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid development of large artificial intelligence (AI) models—large language models (LLMs), multimodel large language models (MLLMs) and vision–language models (VLMs)—has enabled instruction-driven visual understanding, where a single foundation model can recognize and localize arbitrary objects from natural-language prompts. However, predictions from individual models remain inconsistent—LLMs hallucinate nonexistent entities, while VLMs exhibit limited recall and unstable calibration compared to purpose-trained detectors. To address these limitations, a new paradigm termed “multiple large AI model’s consensus” has emerged. In this approach, multiple heterogeneous LLMs, MLLMs or VLMs process a shared visual–textual instruction and generate independent structured outputs (bounding boxes and categories). Next, their results are merged through consensus mechanisms. This cooperative inference improves spatial accuracy and semantic correctness, making it particularly suitable for generating high-quality training datasets for fast real-time object detectors. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the large multi-AI model’s consensus for object detection. We formalize the concept, review related literature on ensemble reasoning and multimodal perception, and categorize existing methods into four frameworks: prompt-level, reasoning-to-detection, box-level, and hybrid consensus. We further analyze fusion algorithms, evaluation metrics, and benchmark datasets, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Finally, we discuss open challenges—vocabulary alignment, uncertainty calibration, computational efficiency, and bias propagation—and identify emerging trends such as consensus-aware training, structured reasoning, and collaborative perception ecosystems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multimodal Machine Learning Applications · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, ul. Grudziadzka 5/7, 87-100 Torun, Poland
Institute of Control and Industrial Electronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
References (86)
Show source-provided references
1. (2025, October 23). GPT-4V(ision) System Card. Available online: https://openai.com/index/gpt-4v-system-card/.
2. Liu, H., Li, C., Li, Y., and Lee, Y.J. (2024). Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02484 ↗
3. (2025, October 04). LLaVA-NeXT: Improved Reasoning, OCR, and World Knowledge. Available online: https://llava-vl.github.io/blog/2024-01-30-llava-next/.
4. Chen, Z., Wu, J., Wang, W., Su, W., Chen, G., Xing, S., Zhong, M., Zhang, Q., Zhu, X., and Lu, L. (2024). InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02283 ↗
5. A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models10.1093/nsr/nwae403 ↗
6. Liu, H., Xue, W., Chen, Y., Chen, D., Zhao, X., Wang, K., Hou, L., Li, R., and Peng, W. (2024). A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models. arXiv.
7. A Survey on Open-Vocabulary Detection and Segmentation: Past, Present, and Future10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3413013 ↗
8. Weighted Boxes Fusion: Ensembling Boxes from Different Object Detection Models10.1016/j.imavis.2021.104117 ↗
9. Razinkov, E., Saveleva, I., and Matas, J. (2018, January 20–24). ALFA: Agglomerative Late Fusion Algorithm for Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICPR.2018.8545182 ↗
10. Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., and Hassner, T. (2022, January 23–27). Multimodal Object Detection via Probabilistic Ensembling. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV 2022, Tel Aviv, Israel.10.1007/978-3-031-20080-9 ↗
11. Wang, J., Wang, J., Athiwaratkun, B., Zhang, C., and Zou, J. (2024). Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities. arXiv.
12. Jiang, D., Ren, X., and Lin, B.Y. (2023, January 9–14). LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Long Papers), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.792 ↗
13. Pi, R., Gao, J., Diao, S., Pan, R., Dong, H., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Han, J., Xu, H., and Kong, L. (2023, January 6–10). DetGPT: Detect What You Need via Reasoning. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore.10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.876 ↗
14. Contextual Object Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models10.1007/s11263-024-02214-4 ↗
15. Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 ↗
16. Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey10.1109/JPROC.2023.3238524 ↗
17. Transformers in Vision: A Survey10.1145/3505244 ↗
18. Towards Open Vocabulary Learning: A Survey10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3361862 ↗
19. Visual Grounding in 2D and 3D: A Unified Perspective and Survey10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103625 ↗
20. VLP: A Survey on Vision-Language Pre-training10.1007/s11633-022-1369-5 ↗
21. Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3369699 ↗
22. Wu, J., Gan, W., Chen, Z., Wan, S., and Yu, P.S. (2023, January 15–18). Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), Sorrento, Italy.10.1109/BigData59044.2023.10386743 ↗
23. Caffagni, D., Cocchi, F., Barsellotti, L., Moratelli, N., Sarto, S., Baraldi, L., Cornia, M., and Cucchiara, R. (2024, January 11–16). The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.807 ↗
24. Bai, Z., Wang, P., Xiao, T., He, T., Han, Z., Zhang, Z., and Shou, M.Z. (2025). Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey. arXiv.
25. Li, Y., Du, Y., Zhou, K., Wang, J., Zhao, W.X., and Wen, J.R. (2023). Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.20 ↗
26. Kaul, P., Li, Z., Yang, H., Dukler, Y., Swaminathan, A., Taylor, C.J., and Soatto, S. (2024, January 16–22). THRONE: An Object-Based Hallucination Benchmark for the Free-Form Generations of Large Vision-Language Models. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02571 ↗
27. Guan, T., Liu, F., Wu, X., Xian, R., Li, Z., Liu, X., Wang, X., Chen, L., Huang, F., and Yacoob, Y. (2024). HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Models. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01363 ↗
28. Pham, N., and Schott, M. (2024). H-POPE: Hierarchical Polling-based Probing Evaluation of Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models. arXiv.
29. Seth, A., Manocha, D., and Agarwal, C. (2025). Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Hallucinations in Large-Vision Language Models. arXiv.
30. Mienye, I.D., and Swart, T.G. (2025). Ensemble Large Language Models: A Survey. Information, 16.10.3390/info16080688 ↗
31. Chen, Z., Li, J., Chen, P., Li, Z., Sun, K., Luo, Y., Mao, Q., Li, M., Xiao, L., and Yang, D. (2025). Harnessing Multiple Large Language Models: A Survey on LLM Ensemble. arXiv.
32. Ashiga, M., Jie, W., Wu, F., Voskanyan, V., Dinmohammadi, F., Brookes, P., Gong, J., and Wang, Z. (2025). Ensemble Learning for Large Language Models in Text and Code Generation: A Survey. arXiv.
33. Wang, X., Wei, J., Schuurmans, D., Le, Q., Chi, E., Narang, S., Chowdhery, A., and Zhou, D. (2023). Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models. arXiv.
34. Du, Y., Li, S., Torralba, A., Tenenbaum, J.B., and Mordatch, I. (2023). Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate. arXiv.
35. Tekin, S.F., Ilhan, F., Huang, T., Hu, S., and Liu, L. (2024, January 12–16). LLM-TOPLA: Efficient LLM Ensemble by Maximising Diversity. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, Miami, FL, USA.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.698 ↗
36. Sun, G., Kagrecha, A., Manakul, P., Woodland, P., and Gales, M. (2024). SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregation. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.756 ↗
37. Refining LLMs outputs with iterative consensus ensemble (ICE)10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110731 ↗
38. Zheng, L., Chiang, W.L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., and Xing, E.P. (2023). Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. arXiv.
39. Cui, Y., Fu, H., Zhang, H., Wang, L., and Zuo, C. (2025). Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate. arXiv.
40. Chen, L., Davis, J.Q., Hanin, B., Bailis, P., Stoica, I., Zaharia, M., and Zou, J. (2024). Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systems. arXiv.
41. Nair-Kanneganti, A., Chan, T.J., Goldfinger, S., Mackay, E., Anthony, B., and Pouch, A. (2025). Increasing LLM response trustworthiness using voting ensembles. arXiv.
42. Choi, H.K., Zhu, X., and Li, S. (2025). Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?. arXiv.
43. Feng, T., Zhang, H., Lei, Z., Han, P., Patwary, M., Shoeybi, M., Catanzaro, B., and You, J. (2025). FusionFactory: Fusing LLM Capabilities with Multi-LLM Log Data. arXiv.
44. Ensemble Learning in Vision-Language Models: Challenges and Opportunities
45. Object Detection Ensemble Methods: A Comparative Study
46. A Survey of Ensemble Learning for Object Detection
47. Bodla, N., Singh, B., Chellappa, R., and Davis, L.S. (2017, January 22–29). Soft-NMS—Improving Object Detection with One Line of Code. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.593 ↗
48. Neubeck, A., and Van Gool, L. (2006, January 20–24). Efficient Non-Maximum Suppression. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/ICPR.2006.479 ↗
49. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2014, January 23–28). Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
50. Girshick, R. (2015, January 7–13). Fast R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
51. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
52. Lin, T.Y., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., and Belongie, S. (2017, January 21–26). Feature pyramid networks for object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.106 ↗
53. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
54. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016, January 11–14). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
55. Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
56. CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypoints10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_45 ↗
57. Zhou, X., Wang, D., and Krähenbühl, P. (2019). Objects as Points. arXiv.
58. Tian, Z., Shen, C., Chen, H., and He, T. (November, January 27). FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
59. End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
60. Zhu, X., Su, W., Lu, L., Li, B., Wang, X., and Dai, J. (2021). Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv.
61. DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoising10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3335410 ↗
62. Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L.M., and Shum, H.Y. (2022). DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv.
63. Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., and Chen, J. (2024, January 16–22). DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605 ↗
64. Lv, W., Zhao, Y., Chang, Q., Huang, K., Wang, G., and Liu, Y. (2024). RT-DETRv2: Improved Baseline with Bag-of-Freebies for Real-Time Detection Transformer. arXiv.
65. Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., and Clark, J. (2021). Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. arXiv.
66. Li, L.H., Zhang, P., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Li, C., Zhong, Y., Wang, L., Yuan, L., Zhang, L., and Hwang, J.N. (2022, January 18–24). Grounded Language-Image Pre-training. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01069 ↗
67. Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., and Hassner, T. (2022, January 23–27). Simple Open-Vocabulary Object Detection. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV 2022, Tel Aviv, Israel.10.1007/978-3-031-20080-9 ↗
68. Minderer, M., Gritsenko, A., and Houlsby, N. (2024). Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detection. arXiv.
69. Liu, S., Zeng, Z., Ren, T., Li, F., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Jiang, Q., Li, C., Yang, J., and Su, H. (2024). Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-72970-6_3 ↗
70. Ren, T., Jiang, Q., Liu, S., Zeng, Z., Liu, W., Gao, H., Huang, H., Ma, Z., Jiang, X., and Chen, Y. (2024). Grounding DINO 1.5: Advance the “Edge” of Open-Set Object Detection. arXiv.
71. Cheng, T., Song, L., Ge, Y., Liu, W., Wang, X., and Shan, Y. (2024, January 16–22). YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01599 ↗
72. Bai, J., Bai, S., Yang, S., Wang, S., Tan, S., Wang, P., Lin, J., Zhou, C., and Zhou, J. (2023). Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond. arXiv.
73. Du, P., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, L., Liao, Y., Zhang, G., Ding, E., Wang, Y., Wang, J., and Liu, S. (2024). LaMI-DETR: Open-Vocabulary Detection with Language Model Instruction. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-73337-6_18 ↗
74. Fu, S., Yang, Q., Mo, Q., Yan, J., Wei, X., Meng, J., Xie, X., and Zheng, W.S. (2025). LLMDet: Learning Strong Open-Vocabulary Object Detectors under the Supervision of Large Language Models. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.01396 ↗
75. Liu, Y., Duan, H., Zhang, Y., Li, B., Zhang, S., Zhao, W., Yuan, Y., Wang, J., He, C., and Liu, Z. (October, January 29). MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-Around Player?. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV 2024, Milan, Italy.10.1007/978-3-031-72658-3_13 ↗
76. Fu, C., Chen, P., Shen, Y., Qin, Y., Zhang, M., Lin, X., Yang, J., Zheng, X., Li, K., and Sun, X. (2025). MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models. arXiv.
77. Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., and Zitnick, C.L. (2014, January 6–12). Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Zurich, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗
78. Gupta, A., Dollár, P., and Girshick, R. (2019, January 15–20). LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00550 ↗
79. Li, C., Liu, H., Li, L.H., Zhang, P., Aneja, J., Yang, J., Jin, P., Hu, H., Liu, C., and Lee, Y.J. (2022, January 28). ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Models. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (NeurIPS 2022 Datasets and Benchmarks Track), Virtual.
80. Yu, L., Poirson, P., Yang, S., Berg, A.C., and Berg, T.L. (2016). Modeling Context in Referring Expressions. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_5 ↗
81. Plummer, B.A., Wang, L., Cervantes, C.M., Caicedo, J.C., Hockenmaier, J., and Lazebnik, S. (2015, January 7–13). Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Models. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.303 ↗
82. Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 ↗
83. Dietterich, T.G. (2000, January 21–23). Ensemble methods in machine learning. Proceedings of the Multiple Classifier Systems, First International Workshop (MCS), Cagliari, Italy.10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 ↗
84. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017). On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. arXiv.
85. Pre-trained multimodal large language model enhances dermatological diagnosis using SkinGPT-410.1038/s41467-024-50043-3 ↗
86. Large language models in evaluating hidradenitis suppurativa from clinical images