journal article·2025-12-08Open access

Quantification of UAV Flight Safety Margins in Urban Low-Altitude Environments

Peng Wang, Haoshuang Cai, Mu Duan, Xuan Ding, Shen Chen, Yifan Chen, Kuncheng Jiang, Chuli Hu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 24

Abstract

In complex urban low-altitude (ULA) airspace, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face several safety challenges, such as building obstacles, airspace restrictions, and environmental uncertainties. In this study, these issues are addressed by adopting a novel quantitative method for evaluating UAV flight safety margins and integrating this method into a ULA airspace grid model. This method comprehensively considers critical factors such as airspace obstacles, environmental conditions, and UAV performance to compute a quantitative safety margin. Once safety buffer grids around restricted and potential conflict grids are introduced, dynamic constraints can be imposed on the trajectory planning process. The proposed model not only achieves a balance between path cost and safety redundancy but also significantly enhances UAV flight safety and the efficiency of airspace resource utilization in complex urban environments. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of this approach for planning multi-UAV trajectories, demonstrating its feasibility and potential for broader application. This research not only extends the safety implications of low-altitude airspace grid modeling but also provides a new technical pathway and theoretical foundation for future ULA airspace safety management, multi-UAV collaborative scheduling, and refined airspace governance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Traffic Management and Optimization · Aerospace and Aviation Technology · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Information Science and Engineering, Wuchang Shouyi University, Wuhan 430223, China

School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

National Engineering Research Center for Geographic Information System, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China · Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of low-altitude airspace10.1088/1742-6596/1302/4/042032 ↗
2. Anti-collision technologies for unmanned aerial vehicles: Recent advances and future trends10.1109/JIOT.2021.3135578 ↗
3. The exploration and practice of low-altitude airspace flight service and traffic management in China10.1016/j.geits.2024.100149 ↗
4. Pang, B., Tan, Q., Ra, T., and Low, K.H. (2020, January 15–19). A risk-based UAS traffic network model for adaptive urban airspace management. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Online.10.2514/6.2020-2900 ↗
5. Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Ma, J. (2024). Grid matrix-based ground risk map generation for unmanned aerial vehicles in urban environments. Drones, 8.10.3390/drones8110678 ↗
6. Guérin, J., Delmas, K., and Guiochet, J. (2021, January 21–24). Certifying emergency landing for safe urban UAV. Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/DSN-W52860.2021.00020 ↗
7. A risk-aware path planning strategy for UAVs in urban environments10.1007/s10846-018-0924-3 ↗
8. A risk model of passenger ship fire safety and its application10.1016/j.ress.2020.106937 ↗
9. Feng, O., Zhang, H., Tang, W., Wang, F., Feng, D., and Zhong, G. (2025). Digital low-altitude airspace unmanned aerial vehicle path planning and operational capacity assessment in urban risk environments. Drones, 9.10.3390/drones9050320 ↗
10. Vincent-Boulay, N., Marsden, C., and Cui, A. (2024, January 8–12). Data-driven geospatial modeling for complex airspace environments. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2024-0571 ↗
11. Cognition and modeling of urban low-altitude
12. Liu, Q., Zhao, X., Wang, X., Qin, M., and Sun, W. (2025). A multi-scale airspace sectorization framework based on QTM and HDQN. Aerospace, 12.10.3390/aerospace12060552 ↗
13. A dynamic airspace grid map based on 3D subdivision framework10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-555-2025 ↗
14. Mohamed Salleh, M.F.B., and Low, K.H. (2017, January 9–13). Concept of operations (ConOps) for traffic management of unmanned aircraft systems (TM-UAS) in urban environment. Proceedings of the AIAA Information Systems—AIAA Infotech@Aerospace, Grapevine, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2017-0223 ↗
15. Zhu, D., Chen, Z., Xie, X., and Chen, J. (2023). Discretization method to improve the efficiency of complex airspace operation. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10090780 ↗
16. Labib, N.S., Danoy, G., Musial, J., Brust, M.R., and Bouvry, P. (2019, January 25–29). A multilayer low-altitude airspace model for UAV traffic management. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Design and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications, Miami Beach, FL, USA.10.1145/3345838.3355998 ↗
17. Kopardekar, P.H. (2014). Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM): Enabling Low-Altitude Airspace and UAS Operations, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
18. Zhai, W., Tong, X., Miao, S., Cheng, C., and Ren, F. (2019). Collision detection for UAVs based on GeoSOT-3D grids. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8070299 ↗
19. Multidepot drone path planning with collision avoidance10.1109/JIOT.2022.3151791 ↗
20. A survey of safety separation management and collision avoidance approaches of civil UAS operating in integration national airspace system10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.009 ↗
21. A geospatial approach to modeling airspace risk factors
22. Safe path correction method for ambulance aircraft based on low-altitude wind prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964736 ↗
23. A review on airspace design and risk assessment for urban air mobility10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3481148 ↗
24. Sunil, E., Hoekstra, J., Ellerbroek, J., Bussink, F., Nieuwenhuisen, D., Vidosavljevic, A., and Kern, S. (2015, January 23–26). Metropolis: Relating airspace structure and capacity for extreme traffic densities. Proceedings of the 11th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (ATM Seminar 2015), Lisbon, Portugal.
25. Xie, H., Ji, X., Yin, J., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., and Dai, S. (2025). Standardization of safety separation for multi-category unmanned aerial vehicles in low-altitude airspace operations. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15137501 ↗
26. Integrating unmanned aerial vehicles in airspace: A systematic review10.51785/jar.1393271 ↗
27. Baum, M.S. (2021). Unmanned Aircraft Systems Traffic Management: UTM, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003124689 ↗
28. Kopardekar, P., Rios, J., Prevot, T., Johnson, M., Jung, J., and Robinson, J.E. (2016, January 13–17). Unmanned aircraft system traffic management (UTM) concept of operations. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum and Exposition, Washington, DC, USA.
29. Progress and application of safety margin research
30. Geodesic discrete global grid systems10.1559/152304003100011090 ↗
31. Zhou, J., Ben, J., Wang, R., Zheng, M., and Du, L. (2020). Lattice quad-tree indexing algorithm for a hexagonal discrete global grid system. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9020083 ↗
32. (2025, August 18). Geospatial Intelligence in Joint Operations. Available online: https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/jp2_03.pdf.
33. Headquarters, Department of the Army (1967). Grids and Grid References, U.S. Government Printing Office.
34. MicroImages Inc (2012, May 17). Google Maps Structure. Available online: http://www.microimages.com/documentation/TechGuides/78googleMapsStruc.pdf.
35. Cheng, C., Tong, X., Chen, B., and Zhai, W. (2016). A subdivision method to unify the existing latitude and longitude grids. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 5.10.3390/ijgi5090161 ↗
36. Sun, G., Qu, T., Han, B., Sun, H., and Zhang, Q. (2021, January 14–16). Research on airspace grid modeling based on GeoSOT global subdivision model. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Weihai, China.10.1109/ICCASIT53235.2021.9633363 ↗
37. (2020). BeiDou Grid Code (Standard No. GB/T 39409-2020).
38. Shu, P., Zheng, Y., Shi, H., Liu, S., Sun, H., and Zhou, X. (2021, January 14–16). Three-dimensional grid model of airspace resources based on Beidou grid code. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Weihai, China.10.1109/ICCASIT53235.2021.9633614 ↗
39. Highly reliable relative navigation for multi-UAV formation flight in urban environments10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.022 ↗
40. Risk assessment using a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001757 ↗
41. Zhang, J., Li, Z., Luo, X., Zhao, Y., and Lu, F. (2024). Study of urban unmanned aerial vehicle separation in free flight based on track prediction. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135712 ↗
42. A path planning algorithm for three-dimensional collision avoidance based on potential field and B-spline boundary curve10.1016/j.ast.2023.108763 ↗
43. Tangent-based path planning for UAV in a 3-D low altitude urban environment10.1109/TITS.2023.3285568 ↗