Machine Learning for Out-of-Sample Prediction of Industry Portfolio Returns Within Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurately predicting asset returns remains a central challenge in finance, with significant implications for portfolio optimization and risk management. In response to the challenge, this study evaluates the predictive performance of machine learning algorithms in estimating excess returns of U.S. industry portfolios, within the out-of-sample prediction framework of the Fama–French three-, four-, five- and six-factor asset pricing models. In the analysis, Support Vector Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, Linear Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbor were employed using monthly return data from 1992 to 2022, covering 5-, 10-, 12-, 17-, 30-, 38-, 48-, and 49-portfolio configurations composed of NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ-listed firms. The findings reveal that support vector regression achieved the highest number of top-ranked results, producing the most successful outcomes in 305 out of 836 model–portfolio combinations. However, multilayer perceptron achieved the best fit in the largest number of portfolios, ranking first in all groups except the 5-industry configuration. Furthermore, the Fama–French five-factor model outperformed other specifications across all groupings, confirming the value of incorporating profitability and investment information. Predictive performance also varied by industry, as wholesale and manufacturing sectors exhibited strong alignment, whereas utilities and energy-related sectors, likely constrained by structural or regulatory features, remained less responsive and exposed to long-term risks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Stock Market Forecasting Methods · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies · Market Dynamics and Volatility
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Business Information Management, Mersin University, 33343 Mersin, Türkiye
Department of Business Administration, Mersin University, 33343 Mersin, Türkiye
Department of Computer Engineering, Tarsus University, 33400 Tarsus, Türkiye
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Kumar, M., and Thenmozhi, M. (2006, January 24). Forecasting Stock Index Movement: A Comparison of Support Vector Machines and Random Forest. Proceedings of the 9th Capital Markets Conference, Indian Institute of Capital Markets, Mumbai, India. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=876544.10.2139/ssrn.876544 ↗
2. Forecasting stock indices: A comparison of classification and level estimation models10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00048-5 ↗
3. Improving estimation of portfolio risk using new statistical factors10.1007/s10479-024-06307-8 ↗
4. Multiple-factor optimistic value based model and parameter estimation for uncertain portfolio optimization10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122059 ↗
5. The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices10.1086/294743 ↗
6. Feng, R., Jiang, S., Liang, X., and Xia, M. (2025). STGAT: Spatial–Temporal Graph Attention Neural Network for Stock Prediction. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15084315 ↗
7. Asset pricing and machine learning: A critical review10.1111/joes.12532 ↗
8. Modern Portfolio Theory, 1950 to Date10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00048-4 ↗
9. Portfolio selection
10. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk
11. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets10.2307/1924119 ↗
12. Equilibrium in a capital asset market10.2307/1910098 ↗
13. The Arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6 ↗
14. Sharpe, W.F., Alexander, G.J., and Bailey, J.V. (1998). Investments, Prentice Hall. [6th ed.].
15. The cross-section of expected stock returns
16. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5 ↗
17. On persistence in mutual fund performance10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x ↗
18. Five-factor asset pricing model10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010 ↗
19. Choosing factors10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012 ↗
20. Fama–French five-factor model and the necessity of value factor: Evidence from Istanbul stock Exchange10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.972 ↗
21. Is the Fama and French five-factor model robust in the Chinese stock market?10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.10.002 ↗
22. Revisiting the price effect in U.S. stocks10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.017 ↗
23. Research on the application of Fama-French 5-factor model in the steel industry during COVID-1910.1088/1742-6596/1865/4/042104 ↗
24. Investment performance attribution of the U.S. small-size value mutual funds using Fama French five-factor model10.5937/intrev2202021K ↗
25. Kostin, K.B., Runge, P., and Mamedova, L.E. (2023). Validity of the Fama–French Three- and Five-Factor Models in Crisis Settings at the Example of Select Energy-Sector Companies during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11010049 ↗
26. The effects of common macroeconomıcs factors on U.S. stock returns
27. Comparing factor models with price-impact costs10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103949 ↗
28. Marti-Ballester, C.P. (2025). Environmental Innovation and the Performance of Healthcare Mutual Funds under Economic Stress. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17104594 ↗
29. Woo, K.Y., Mai, C., McAller, M., and Wong, W.K. (2020). Review on efficiency and anomalies in stock markets. Economies, 8.10.3390/economies8010020 ↗
30. Incorporating stock prices and news sentiments for stock market prediction: A case of Hong Kong10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102212 ↗
31. Desai, M. (2025, February 01). What the Finance Industry Tells Us About the Future of AI. Harvard Business Review 9 August 2023. Available online: https://hbr.org/2023/08/what-the-finance-industry-tells-us-about-the-future-of-ai.
32. Understanding the dynamics of investment factors and exchange-traded funds performance in the U.S. market 2018-202210.5937/intrev2304123K ↗
33. Empirical asset pricing via machine learning10.1093/rfs/hhaa009 ↗
34. A nonparametric approach to pricing and hedging derivative securities via learning networks10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00081.x ↗
35. Gregoriou, G.N. (2012). Machine Learning and Short Positions in Stock Trading Strategies, Academic Press.
36. Shen, W., Wang, J., and Ma, S. (2014, January 27–31). Doubly regularized portfolio with risk minimization. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Quebec City, QC, Canada.10.1609/aaai.v28i1.8906 ↗
37. Deep learning for finance: Deep portfolios10.1002/asmb.2209 ↗
38. Zhang, G., and Chen, P. (2017, January 3–5). Forecast of yearly stock returns based on Adaboost integration algorithm. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud (SmartCloud), New York, NY, USA.
39. Nguyen, T.T., and Yoon, S. (2019). A Novel Approach to Short-Term Stock Price Movement Prediction Using Transfer Learning. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224745 ↗
40. Machine learning in empirical asset pricing10.1007/s11408-019-00326-3 ↗
41. Do the Fama and French five-factor model forecast well using ANN?10.3846/jbem.2019.8250 ↗
42. Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: Evidence from the European stock market10.1057/s41260-021-00237-x ↗
43. Fama–French three versus five: Which model is better? A machine learning approach10.1002/for.2970 ↗
44. Li, Y., and Teng, Y. (2023). The Fama–French five-factor model with Hurst exponents compared with machine learning methods. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11132988 ↗
45. Asset pricing with neural networks: Significance tests10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105574 ↗
46. A Machine-Learning Approach in Assessing the Fama–French Three and Five Factor Model
47. Improving the interpretability of asset pricing models by explainable AI: A machine learning-based approach
48. Nonlinear dependencies in the Fama–French three-factor model10.1080/10293523.2023.2179162 ↗
49. comparison of CAPM and Fama-French three-factor model under machine learning approaching
50. Mispricing in Linear Asset Pricing Models10.1080/00036846.2024.2311733 ↗
51. Do there exist nonlinear phenomena of the Fama–French six factors on stock returns? An empirical investigation on the Taiwan stock market10.4236/me.2024.154021 ↗
52. Feature importance in linear models with ensemble machine learning: A study of the Fama and French five-factor model10.1016/j.frl.2024.106406 ↗
53. University of Waikato (2022, November 06). WEKA 3.8: Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis. Available online: https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/.
54. Deep Learning for Volatility Forecasting in Asset Management
55. A multi-feature selection fused with investor sentiment for stock price prediction10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127381 ↗
56. French, K.R. (2022, February 20). Current Research Returns. Data Library. Available online: https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html.
57. Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley.
58. Support vector machine with adaptive parameters in financial time series forecasting10.1109/TNN.2003.820556 ↗
59. Discriminatory analysis. Nonparametric discrimination: Consistency properties10.2307/1403797 ↗
60. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
61. Machine Learning approach for predicting employee attrition and factors leading to attrition
62. The model confidence set10.3982/ECTA5771 ↗
63. Sarıoğlu Duran, E. (2023). Evaluation of Fama-French Asset Pricing Models with Machine Learning Methods: An Application on International Market Portfolios. [Ph.D. Thesis, Mersin University].
64. The Concentration of Fractional Distances10.1109/TKDE.2007.1037 ↗
65. Reaves Asset Management (2025, August 06). Low Beta vs. High Beta: Different Ride, Similar Destination. Available online: https://insights.reavesam.com/blog/low-beta-vs.-high-beta-different-ride-similar-destination.
66. Industry regulation and the comovement of stock returns10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.06.005 ↗