journal article·2025-12-01Open access

3D Analysis of the Initial and End Positions of an Active and Passive Prone Hip Extension Test and Its Correlation with Lower Limb Isokinetic Neuromuscular Function of College Students: A Pilot Study

José Lumini, Benjamin Hedirian, Pedro Fonseca, Andrea Ribeiro, André Chenu Schneider, António M. Monteiro, João Paulo Vilas-Boas

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Introduction: Manual therapists routinely evaluate changes in pain, movement, and function through clinical tests that support clinical reasoning. The Prone Hip Extension Test (PHET) is commonly used as a self-perturbation task to assess lumbopelvic control and hip motion patterns related to gait. Performing the PHET actively and passively may reveal how voluntary activation and passive structures influence joint kinematics and contribute to force production. This study aimed to compare active and passive PHET execution and investigate how initial (IP) and final hip positions (FP) correlate with lower-limb neuromuscular function. Methods: Seven healthy volunteers (24.3 ± 3.4 years; 173.1 ± 7.5 cm; 72.1 ± 9.5 kg) without musculoskeletal conditions participated. Hip kinematics were recorded using a 12-camera Qualisys Oqus system (200 Hz) with 22 reflective markers, processed in Qualisys Track Manager 2.13 and exported to Visual3D. Participants performed three PHET trials in both IP and FP, with mean an-gles considered for analysis. Knee isokinetic performance was assessed on a Biodex System 4 at 180°/s and 300°/s for flexion and extension. Results: Significant differences between active and passive PHET emerged in the FP for rotational movements bilaterally (p = 0.02) and in IP adduction/abduction for both hips (right p = 0.03; left p = 0.02). No side-to-side differences were observed. Passive FP of the right hip showed multiple significant correlations with isokinetic flexion and extension parameters at 180°/s and 300°/s, particularly with torque/body weight, acceleration and deceleration times, and agonist/antagonist ratios (ρ ranging from −0.86 to 0.90). Conclusions: Meaningful differences exist between active and passive PHET performance, especially in frontal-plane IP and rotational FP measures. Additionally, passive FP strongly correlates with several neuromuscular variables, suggesting that PHET kinematics may reflect lower-limb isokinetic function.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Sports injuries and prevention · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centro Interdisciplinar em Ciências da Saúde (CICS), ISAVE (Instituto Superior de Saúde), Rua Castelo de Al-mourol n° 13, 4720-155 Amares, Portugal

Research Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sport of University of Porto (FADEUP), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), 4720-155 Porto, Portugal

Laboratório de Biomecânica do Porto (LABIOMEP-UP), University of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

Centro de Investigação em Reabilitação (CIR), Escola Superior de Saúde, Politécnico do Porto, Rua Doutor António Bernardino de Almei-da 400, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

Department of Sports Sciences, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal

Research Centre for Active Living and Wellbeing (Livewell), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal

Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain

Faculty of Sport and CIFI2D, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Praça 9 de Abril 349, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal

Funding

Fundação para a Ciênciae Tecnologia

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Janda, V. (1978). Muscles, central nervous motor regulation and back problems. Neurobiologic Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy, Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4684-8902-6_2 ↗
2. Liebenson, C. (2007). Evaluation of muscle imbalance. Rehabilitation of the Spine: A Practitioner’s Manual, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
3. Sahrmann, S.A., Azevedo, D.C., and Van Dillen, L.R. (2002). Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes, Mosby.
4. Muscle Activation and Movement Patterns During Prone Hip Extension Exercise in Women10.4085/1062-6050-44.3.238 ↗
5. Interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected impaired motor control of the lumbar spine10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.04.012 ↗
6. Inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the prone hip extension test and active straight leg raise test10.1186/2045-709X-22-23 ↗
7. The influence of ankle sprain injury on muscle activation during hip extension10.1055/s-2007-1021069 ↗
8. Prone hip extension with lower abdominal hollowing improves the relative timing of gluteus maximus activation in relation to biceps femoris10.1016/j.math.2009.07.001 ↗
9. Trunk and hip muscle recruitment patterns during the prone leg extension following a lateral ankle sprain: A prospective case study pre and post injury10.1186/1746-1340-14-4 ↗
10. Lehman, G.J., Lennon, D., Tresidder, B., Rayfield, B., and Poschar, M. (2004). Muscle recruitment patterns during the prone leg extension. BMC Musculoskelet Disord., 5.10.1186/1471-2474-5-3 ↗
11. Lumbar lordosis in prone position and prone hip extension test: Comparison between subjects with and without low back pain10.1186/s12998-017-0139-x ↗
12. Patient-reported perception of difficulty as a clinical indicator of dysfunctional neuromuscular control during the prone hip extension test and active straight leg raise test10.1016/j.math.2014.06.002 ↗
13. Dynamic testing of the motor stereotype in prone hip extension from neutral position10.1016/S0268-0033(96)00055-1 ↗
14. The prone hip extension test: A method of measuring hip flexion deformity10.1097/00003086-197703000-00005 ↗
15. WMA (2025, February 22). The World Medical Association-Declaration of Helsinki. Available online: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/.
16. Muscle firing order during active prone hip extension10.2519/jospt.1990.12.1.2 ↗
17. Comparison of isokinetic muscle strength and muscle power by types of warm-up10.1589/jpts.27.1491 ↗
18. Analysis of Hip Range of Motion in Everyday Life: A Pilot Study10.5301/hipint.5000192 ↗
19. A pilot study of biomechanical assessment before and after an integrative training program for adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia10.1186/s12969-016-0103-7 ↗
20. LABIOMEP (2025, February 22). Porto Biomechanics Laboratory. Available online: https://labiomep.up.pt/.
21. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: Theoretical background
22. Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems II10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01093-4 ↗
23. Accuracy and precision of a custom camera-based system for 2-d and 3-d motion tracking during speech and nonspeech motor tasks10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-13-0007 ↗
24. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.05.002 ↗
25. The measurement of human motion: A comparison of commercially available systems10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00023-8 ↗
26. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part I: Ankle, hip, and spine
27. Comprehensive isokinetic knee measurements and quadriceps tendon evaluations in footballers for assessing functional performance10.1136/bjsm.37.6.507 ↗
28. Biostatistics 104: Correlational analysis
29. The assessment of function: How is it measured? A clinical perspective10.1179/106698111X12973307659546 ↗
30. Multivariate isokinetic strength asymmetries of the knee and ankle in professional soccer players
31. Lower extremity preference and knee extensor torques in intercollegiate soccer players
32. Isokinetic Strength during Knee Flexion and Extension in Elite Fencers10.2466/pms.108.3.949-961 ↗
33. Functional muscle asymmetries and laterality in Latin American formation dancers10.3233/BMR-160633 ↗
34. The effect of limb dominance on lower limb functional performance—a systematic review10.1080/02640414.2015.1050601 ↗
35. Soccer Footedness and Between-Limbs Muscle Strength: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1123/ijspp.2018-0336 ↗
36. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: A prospective study10.1177/0363546508316764 ↗
37. Isometric strength ratios of the hip musculature in females with patellofemoral pain: A comparison to pain-free controls10.1519/JSC.0b013e318279793d ↗
38. Relationship between hip muscle imbalance and occurrence of low back pain in collegiate athletes: A prospective study10.1097/00002060-200108000-00005 ↗
39. Hip muscle imbalance and low back pain in athletes: Influence of core strengthening10.1097/00005768-200201000-00003 ↗
40. Relationship between leg dominance tests and type of task
41. Differences in timing and magnitude of lumbopelvic rotation during active and passive knee extension in sitting position in people with and without low back pain: A cross-sectional study10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.012 ↗
42. Quadriceps activation following aerobic exercise in persons with low back pain and healthy controls10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.05.009 ↗
43. An investigation into motor pattern differences used during prone hip extension between subjects with and without low back pain10.1016/j.clch.2006.10.002 ↗