Seismic Data Enhancement for Tunnel Advanced Prediction Based on TSISTA-Net
Source abstract
Abstract
Tunnel seismic advanced prediction is a widely used technique in geotechnical engineering due to its non-destructive characteristics and deep detection capability. However, limitations in acquisition space and complex on-site conditions often result in missing traces, damaged channels, and low-resolution data, thereby hindering accurate geological interpretation. Although deep learning models such as U-Net have shown promise in seismic data reconstruction, their emphasis on local features and fixed parameter configurations limits their capacity to capture global and long-range dependencies, thereby constraining reconstruction accuracy. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel deep unrolling network, TSISTA-Net (Tunnel Seismic Iterative Shrinkage–Thresholding Algorithm Network), specifically designed to improve seismic data quality. Built upon the ISTA-Net architecture, TSISTA-Net incorporates three distinct innovations. First, reflection padding is utilized to minimize boundary artifacts and effectively recover edge information. Second, multi-scale dilated convolutions are employed to extend the receptive field, thereby facilitating the extraction of long-range and multi-scale features from seismic signals. Third, a lightweight and patch-based processing strategy is adopted, guaranteeing high computational efficiency while maintaining reconstruction quality. The effectiveness of the proposed method was validated on both synthetic and real tunnel seismic datasets. On synthetic data, TSISTA-Net achieved a PSNR of 37.28 dB, an SSIM of 0.9667, and an LCCC of 0.9357, outperforming U-Net (35.93 dB, 0.9480, 0.9087) and conventional ISTA-Net (34.04 dB, 0.9167, 0.8878). These results demonstrate superior signal fidelity, structural similarity, and local correlation relative to established baselines. Consistent improvements were also observed on real tunnel datasets, indicating that TSISTA-Net provides an efficient, data-driven solution for tunnel seismic data processing with strong potential for practical engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Power China Zhongnan Engineering Co., Ltd., Changsha 410019, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Tunnel Seismic Reflection Method for Advance Forecasting
2. Current Status and Development Trends in Advance Geological Forecasting for Tunnel Construction
3. Application of Integrated Detection Technology in Advance Geological Forecasting for Tunnels
4. Zhao, H., Quan, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, L., and Yang, Z. (2023). Key Technology of TBM Excavation in Soft and Broken Surrounding Rock. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137550 ↗
5. Parametric analysis of the seismic response of coupled tunnel–soil–aboveground building systems by numerical modelling10.1007/s10518-016-9975-7 ↗
6. Application of EPS Geofoam below Soil–Steel Composite Bridge Subjected to Seismic Excitations10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12674 ↗
7. Research Progress on the Mechanism of Major Water and Mud Inrush Disasters in Deep Long Tunnels and Their Prediction, Early Warning, and Control Theories
8. Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domain10.1190/1.1443096 ↗
9. Multidimensional Seismic Data Reconstruction Using Frequency-Domain Adaptive Prediction-Error Filter10.1109/TGRS.2017.2778196 ↗
10. Wave-equation trace interpolation10.1190/1.1442366 ↗
11. Seismic reflection data interpolation with differential offset and shot continuation10.1190/1.1567243 ↗
12. Inverse velocity stacking for multiple elimination
13. Nonuniform fast Fourier transform10.1190/1.1444560 ↗
14. Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03698.x ↗
15. Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis10.1190/1.3552706 ↗
16. A Review of Seismic Data Reconstruction Methods
17. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies10.1109/TIT.2006.885507 ↗
18. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint10.1002/cpa.20042 ↗
19. High-precision seismic data reconstruction with multi-domain sparsity constraints based on curvelet and high-resolution Radon transforms10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.12.003 ↗
20. A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems10.1137/080716542 ↗
21. Deep-seismic-prior-based reconstruction of seismic data using convolutional neural networks10.1190/geo2019-0570.1 ↗
22. Deep learning for irregularly and regularly missing 3-D data reconstruction10.1109/TGRS.2020.3016343 ↗
23. Seismic data consecutively missing trace interpolation based on multistage neural network training process
24. Simultaneous denoising and interpolation of seismic data via the deep learning method
25. A Review of Deep Learning Methods for Seismic Data Reconstruction
26. Zhang, J., and Ghanem, B. (2018, January 18–22). ISTA-Net: Interpretable optimization-inspired deep network for image compressive sensing. Proceedings of the IEEE CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00196 ↗
27. GSISTA-Net: Generalized structure ISTA networks for image compressed sensing based on optimized unrolling algorithm10.1007/s11042-024-18724-9 ↗
28. Rabi, R.R., and Monti, G. (2025). Genetic Algorithm-Based Model Updating in a Real-Time Digital Twin for Steel Bridge Monitoring. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15084074 ↗
29. Shear capacity assessment of hollow-core RC piers via machine learning10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108961 ↗
30. Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Tian, J.S., Dagommer, M., and Guo, J. (2025). Deep learning-based MRI reconstruction with Artificial Fourier Transform Network. Comput. Biol. Med., 192.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110224 ↗
31. Efficient urban flood surface reconstruction: Integrating deep learning with hydraulic principles for sparse observations
32. Classification of seed maize using deep learning and transfer learning based on times series spectral feature reconstruction of remote sensing10.1016/j.compag.2025.110738 ↗
33. Self-adaptive physics-driven deep learning for seismic wave modeling in complex topography10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106425 ↗
34. Seismic data reconstruction based on low dimensional manifold model
35. Can learning from natural image denoising be used for seismic data interpolation?10.1190/geo2019-0243.1 ↗
36. A projection-onto-convex-sets network for 3D seismic data interpolation10.1190/geo2022-0326.1 ↗
37. Group-based Sparse Representation for image restoration10.1109/TIP.2014.2323127 ↗
38. Real-time tunnel risk forecasting based on rock drill signals during construction10.1016/j.tust.2025.106963 ↗
39. Simultaneous reconstruction and denoising of seismic data based on rank reduction and sparsity constraints
40. Seismic Data Reconstruction based on Attention U-net and Transfer Learning10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105241 ↗
41. Seismic data reconstruction via an adaptive feature fusion network10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111982 ↗
42. Das, R., and Das, A. (2025). Limitations of Mw and M Scales: Compelling Evidence Advocating for the Das Magnitude Scale (Mwg)—A Critical Review and Analysis. Indian Geotech. J.10.1007/s40098-024-01147-6 ↗
43. A seismic Moment Magnitude Scale10.1785/0120180338 ↗