A Risk-Driven Probabilistic Framework for Blast Vibrations in Twin Tunnels: Integrating Monte Carlo Simulation to Quantify Cavity Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
Predicting blast-induced vibrations in twin tunnels is challenging due to complex wave-cavity interactions, which render conventional scaled-distance (PPV-SD) models inadequate. This study introduces a hybrid empirical-probabilistic framework to quantify the probability of exceeding regulatory vibration thresholds. Field data from the Northern Marmara Highway project first quantitatively confirm the severe degradation of the classical scaled-distance (PPV-SD) method in twin-tunnel geometry, reducing a strong correlation (R = 0.82) to insignificance. A Random Forest sensitivity analysis, applied to 123 blast records, ranked the governing parameters, guiding the development of a deterministic multi-parameter regression model (R = 0.72). The core innovation of this framework is the embedding of this deterministic model within a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to propagate documented input uncertainties, thereby generating a full probability distribution for PPV. This represents a fundamental advance beyond deterministic point-estimates, as it enables the direct calculation of exceedance probabilities for risk-informed decision-making. For instance, for a regulatory threshold of 10 mm/s, the framework quantified the exceedance probability as P (PPV > 10 mm/s) = 5.2%. The framework’s robustness was demonstrated via validation against 100 independent blast records, which showed strong calibration with 94% of observed PPV values captured within the model’s 90% confidence interval. This computationally efficient framework (<10,000 iterations) provides engineers with a practical tool for moving from deterministic safety factors to quantifiable, risk-informed decision-making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mining Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34500, Türkiye
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34320, Türkiye
Funding
Executive Secretariat of Scientific Research Projects of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa · Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye · Engineering Faculty Revolving Fund
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of blast-induced vibration on existing tunnels in soft rocks10.1016/j.tust.2010.05.004 ↗
2. Effect of blast-induced vibration from new railway tunnel on existing adjacent railway tunnel in Xinjiang, China10.1007/s00603-012-0259-5 ↗
3. Numerical analysis of blast-induced stress waves in a rock mass with anisotropic continuum damage models part 1: Equivalent material property approach10.1007/s006030200012 ↗
4. Blasting vibration safety criterion for a tunnel liner structure10.1016/j.tust.2012.04.016 ↗
5. Dowding, C.H. (1985). Blast Vibration Monitoring and Control, Prentice-Hall.
6. Siskind, D.E., Stagg, M.S., Kopp, J.W., and Dowding, C.H. (1980). Structure Response and Damage Produced by Ground Vibration from Surface Mine Blasting, RI 8507.
7. Parametric analysis of the seismic response of coupled tunnel–soil–aboveground building systems by numerical modelling10.1007/s10518-016-9975-7 ↗
8. Application of EPS Geofoam below Soil–Steel Composite Bridge Subjected to Seismic Excitations
9. Li, W., Wang, X., Chen, L., Wang, C., and Liu, J. (2023). Empirical prediction of blast-induced vibration on adjacent tunnels. Front. Ecol. Evol., 11.10.3389/fevo.2023.1212654 ↗
10. Investigation of pile group response to adjacent twin tunnel excavation utilizing machine learning
11. Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation10.1063/1.3295638 ↗
12. Little, T.N., and Blair, D.P. (2010). Mechanistic Monte Carlo models for analysis of flyrock risk. Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Taylor & Francis.
13. Risk assessment and prediction of flyrock distance by combined multiple regression analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of quarry blasting10.1007/s00603-016-1015-z ↗
14. Monte Carlo simulation approach for effective assessment of flyrock based on intelligent system of neural network
15. Mahdiyar, A., Armaghani, D.J., Koopialipoor, M., Hedayat, A., Abdullah, A., and Yahya, K. (2020). Practical risk assessment of ground vibrations resulting from blasting, using gene expression programming and Monte Carlo simulation techniques. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020472 ↗
16. Probabilistic modeling of excavation-induced damage depth around rock-excavated tunnels10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100075 ↗
17. Case study on the cavity effect of a water tunnel on the ground vibrations induced by excavating blasts10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.026 ↗
18. Comparative study on tunnel blast-induced vibration for the underground cavern group10.1007/s12665-020-09362-z ↗
19. Comparative study on calculation methods of blasting vibration velocity10.1007/s00603-010-0108-3 ↗
20. Safety threshold determination for blasting vibration of the lining in existing tunnels under adjacent tunnel blasting10.1155/2019/8303420 ↗
21. Research on vibration effect of tunnel blasting based on an improved Hilbert–Huang transform10.1007/s12665-021-09506-9 ↗
22. Propagation characteristics and prediction of blast-induced vibration on closely spaced rock tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2022.104416 ↗
23. Mitigation strategies for blasting-induced cracks and vibrations in twin-arch tunnel structures10.1016/j.dt.2025.03.009 ↗
24. Influence of tunnel blasting construction on adjacent highway tunnel: A case study in Wuhan, China10.1177/2041419619888936 ↗
25. Assessment of underground tunnel stability to adjacent tunnel explosion10.1016/j.tust.2012.07.005 ↗
26. Response of existing lining subjected to closed blasting in zero-spacing twin tunnels and its damping measures10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108847 ↗
27. Monte Carlo simulation as a tool to predict blasting fragmentation based on the Kuz–Ram model10.1016/j.cageo.2005.06.022 ↗
28. Development of an empirical model for predicting the effects of controllable blasting parameters on flyrock distance in surface mines10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.03.011 ↗
29. Numerical analysis of the stability of abandoned cavities in bench blasting10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.12.008 ↗
30. Characteristics of surface ground motions induced by blasts in jointed rock mass10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00104-4 ↗
31. The effect of blast-induced vibration on the stability of underground water-sealed gas storage caverns
32. McMurray, A., Pearson, T., and Casarim, F. (2017). Guidance on Applying the Monte Carlo Approach, Winrock International.
33. The difference in the slope supported system when excavating twin tunnels: Model test and numerical simulation
34. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of blast-induced vibration from adjacent tunnel on existing tunnel10.1007/s12205-015-0130-9 ↗
35. A case study on rock damage prediction and control method for underground tunnels subjected to adjacent excavation blasting10.1016/j.tust.2012.11.010 ↗
36. Dynamic analysis of a twin tunnel in soil subjected to internal blast loading10.1007/s40098-016-0179-5 ↗
37. Richards, A.B., and Moore, A.J. (2004, January 1–4). Flyrock Control—By Chance or Design. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, New Orleans, LO, USA.
38. TTS Engineering (2018). North Marmara Motorway—Cebeci Tunnel Geological and Geotechnical Report, TTS Engineering.
39. Impact of blasting parameters on vibration signal spectrum: Determination and statistical evidence10.1016/j.tust.2015.02.004 ↗
40. (2016). Structural Vibrations—Part 3: Effects of Vibration on Structures (Standard No. DIN 4150-3).