Optimizing Timber Roof Diaphragms for Seismic Damping in the Retrofit of Masonry Churches
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper addresses the seismic retrofitting of masonry churches with timber roofs by designing a ductile roof diaphragm with a new energy-based methodology. The proposed approach relies on nonlinear dynamic analyses conducted on an equivalent structural model. In this model, masonry nonlinearity is represented by rotational plastic hinges at the base of the equivalent wall elements. Roof system nonlinearity is modeled by shear plastic hinges simulating the energy dissipation of steel connections. In the equivalent model, the earthquake is implemented using a set of spectrum-compatible accelerograms. The dynamic response of the aforementioned plastic hinges is analyzed in terms of equivalent damping during the seismic events by extracting the relevant hysteresis cycles. This allows for the evaluation of both dissipated and strain energy. The estimation of the equivalent damping ratio provided by the roof diaphragm is based on multiple design configurations. After identifying the maximum achievable damping ratio, the study suggests ways to determine the corresponding roof stiffness, which defines the optimal retrofit configuration. This configuration is then implemented in a three-dimensional model that includes nonlinear properties for both masonry and connection elements, allowing a validation of the seismic response obtained from the initial equivalent model with a more complex and detailed model. Finally, a seismic response comparison is conducted between the optimized dissipated energy configuration, based on damping ratio evaluation, and an overstrength design variant determined considering the elastic behavior of the roof connections.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
Department Engineering and Architecture, Università degli Studi di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 3D macro-element modelling approach for seismic assessment of historical masonry churches
2. Homogenization Approach for the Limit Analysis of Out-of-Plane Loaded Masonry Walls10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:10(1650) ↗
3. The influence of the geometrical features on the seismic response of historical churches reinforced by different cross lam roof-solutions10.1007/s10518-022-01468-y ↗
4. Shehu, R., Sofi, A., and Milani, G. (2024, January 21–24). Seismic Vulnerability of San Giovannello Church: An Advanced Limit Analysis Approach. Proceedings of the 18th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Birmingham, UK.10.1007/978-3-031-73314-7_29 ↗
5. Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016 ↗
6. Energy-based method for identifying vulnerable macro-elements in historic masonry churches10.1007/s10518-015-9854-7 ↗
7. Experimental estimation of energy dissipation in rocking masonry walls restrained by an innovative seismic dissipator (LICORD)10.1007/s10518-021-01056-6 ↗
8. Modeling Strategies for the Computational Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry Structures: Review and Classification10.1007/s11831-019-09351-x ↗
9. Angelillo, M. (2014). Masonry behaviour and modelling. Mechanics of Masonry Structures, Springer. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences.10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3 ↗
10. Zucca, M., Reccia, E., Longarin, N., and Cazzani, A. (2022). Seismic Assessment and Retrofitting of an Historical Masonry Building Damaged during the 2016 Centro Italia Seismic Event. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122211789 ↗
11. Rinaldi, V., Casagrande, D., Cimini, C., Follesa, M., Sciomenta, M., Spera, L., and Fragiacomo, M. (2021, January 9–12). Simplified Strategies for the Numerical Modelling of CLT Buildings Subjected to Lateral Loads. Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2021), Santiago, Chile. Available online: https://iris.unitn.it/handle/11572/401659.
12. Cyclic behavior of typical screwed connections for cross-laminated (CLT) structures10.1007/s00107-014-0877-6 ↗
13. Spera, L., Sciomenta, M., Bedon, C., and Fragiacomo, M. (2024). Out-of-plane strengthening of timber floors with CLT panels. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14030749 ↗
14. Theoretical and experimental analysis of timber-to-timber joints connected with inclined screws10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.007 ↗
15. Assessing the deformation energy of timber-to-timber inclined screw connections via computed tomography scan10.1007/s00107-023-02028-0 ↗
16. Aicher, S., Reinhardt, H.W., and Garrecht, H. (2014). A Component Model for Cyclic Behaviour of Wooden Structures. Materials and Joints in Timber Structures, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7811-5 ↗
17. Remus, A., Tezcan, S., Sun, J., Milani, G., and Perucchio, R. (2025). Seismic failure assessment using energy outputs of finite element analysis. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15030318 ↗
18. Pietruszczak, S., and Przecherski, P. (2025). Macro-mesoscale submodeling approach for analysis of large masonry structures. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15142382 ↗
19. Formisano, A., Massimilla, A., Formisano, M., and Milani, G. (2018, January 9–11). Simplified Numerical Modelling of Structural Units into Masonry Building Compounds: An Equivalent Frame Method Based Approach. Proceedings of the 10th International Masonry Conference, Milan, Italy.
20. Nonlinear modeling of the seismic response of masonry structures: Critical review and open issues towards engineering practice10.1007/s10518-021-01263-1 ↗
21. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings (Standard No. ATC-40). Available online: https://tanbakoochi.com/File/www.tanbakoochi.com-ATC40.pdf.
22. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Standard No. FEMA 356). Available online: https://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/FEMA356toc.pdf.
23. Schiavoni, M., Giordano, E., Roscini, F., and Clementi, F. (2023). Numerical modeling of a majestic masonry structure: A comparison of advanced techniques. Eng. Fail. Anal., 107293.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107293 ↗
24. Seismic Strengthening and Seismic Improvement of Timber Structures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.093 ↗
25. Mirra, M., and Ravenshorst, G. (2021). Optimizing Seismic Capacity of Existing Masonry Buildings by Retrofitting Timber Floors: Wood-Based Solutions as a Dissipative Alternative to Rigid Concrete Diaphragms. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11120604 ↗
26. D’Arenzo, G., Casagrande, D., and Werner, S. (2021, January 9–12). Rigid or flexible? A numerical investigation on the in-plane behavior of CLT floor diaphragms. Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), Santiago, Chile. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/401662.
27. Mirra, M., and Ravenshorst, G. (2022, January 5–7). A seismic retrofitting design approach for activating dissipative behaviour of timber diaphragms in existing unreinforced masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, 2022, Cape Town, South Africa.10.1201/9781003348450-312 ↗
28. Lourenço, P.B. (2025, November 13). Computational Strategies for Masonry Structures. Available online: https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:4f5a2c6c-d5b7-4043-9d06-8c0b7b9f1f6f.
29. Limit analysis of masonry vaults by means of curved shell finite elements and homogenization
30. Evaluation of Timber Floor In-Plane Retrofitting Interventions on the Seismic Response of Masonry Structures by DEM Analysis: A Case Study10.1007/s10518-021-01190-1 ↗
31. Longarini, N., Crespi, P., Zucca, M., and Scamardo, M. (2025). Numerical evaluation of the equivalent damping ratio due to dissipative roof structure in the retrofit of historical churches. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15063286 ↗
32. Thin-Folded Shell for the Renewal of Existing Wooden Roofs10.1080/15583058.2015.1075626 ↗
33. Preti, M., Bolis, V., Giuriani, E., Marini, A., and Peretti, M. (2013). Studio Del Ruolo Del Diaframma Di Copertura Nel Comportamento Sismico Degli Archi Diaframma Nella Chiesa Parrocchiale Di Sirmione, Università di Brescia. Technical Report n. 1.
34. (2004). Eurocode 5—Design of Timber Structures—General—Common Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1995-1-1). Available online: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1995.1.1.2004.pdf.
35. Wooden Roof Box Structure for the Anti-Seismic Strengthening of Historic Buildings10.1080/15583050802063733 ↗
36. A Method for Generating Fully Non-Stationary and Spectrum-Compatible Ground Motion Vector Processes10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.09.003 ↗
37. REXEL: Computer Aided Record Selection for Code-Based Seismic Structural Analysis10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1 ↗
38. Seismic Force Modification Factors for Modified-Clough Hysteretic Model10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.007 ↗
39. The Effective Period and Damping of a Class of Hysteretic Structures10.1002/eqe.4290070302 ↗
40. Department of Homeland Security (2025, November 13). FEMA 440: Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Available online: https://mitigation.eeri.org/wp-content/uploads/fema-440.pdf.
41. Steady Forced Vibrations as Influenced by Damping An Approximate Solution of the Steady Forced Vibration of a System of One Degree of Freedom Under the Influence of Various Types of Damping
42. Jacobsen, L. (1960, January 11–18). Damping in Composite Structures. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan. Available online: https://engineering.purdue.edu/~ce573/Documents/Damping%20in%20composite%20structures_Jacobsen.pdf.
43. Equivalent Viscous Damping for Yielding Structures10.1061/JMCEA3.0000929 ↗
44. Damping Mechanisms and Damping Ratios in Vibrating Unreinforced Stone Masonry10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.016 ↗
45. (2025, January 30). Midas GEN 2023. Available online: https://support.midasuser.com/hc/en-us/articles/27773333780761--GEN-2023-v1-1-Release-Note.
46. (MATLAB, 2022). MATLAB, version 2022a.
47. (2018). Italian Ministry of Infrastructures. Norme Tecniche per Le Costruzioni. DM 17/1/2018 (Standard No. NTC2018). (In Italian).
48. Clough, R.W. (1966). Effect of Stiffness Degradation on Earthquake Ductility Requirements, UC Berkeley. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/21f175hg.
49. Dataholz.eu (2025). OSB—Oriented Strand Board: Technical Properties and Product Data Sheets, Holzforschung Austria. Available online: https://www.dataholz.eu/fileadmin/dataholz/media/baustoffe/Datenblaetter_de/osb_de_01.pdf.
50. Johansen, K.W. (1949). Theory of Timber Connections, IABSE: International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering. Available online: https://www.e-periodica.ch/digbib/view?pid=bse-me-001%3A1949%3A9%3A%3A292.
51. Hossain, A., Lakshman, R., and Tannert, T. (2015, January 23–25). Shear Connections with Self-Tapping Screws for Cross-Laminated Timber Panels. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2015, Portland, OR, USA.10.1061/9780784479117.195 ↗
52. Simple Cross-Laminated Timber Shear Connections with Spatially Arranged Screws10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.004 ↗
53. (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Design of Steel Structures—Design of Joints (Standard No. EN 1993-1-8). Available online: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1993.1.8.2005-1.pdf.
54. (2001). Wood-Based Panels for Use in Construction—Characteristic Values for Structural Design (Standard No. EN 12369-1:2001). Available online: https://www.intertekinform.com/preview/2001000486393.pdf?sku=871935_saig_nsai_nsai_3731552&srsltid=AfmBOoo83fbUFDDhzPhKUWr2WhSaBixTFraM8Y69tGA70iQPs1lg3-gW.
55. (2015). Wood-Based Panels for Use in Construction—Characteristics, Evaluation of Conformity and Marking (Standard No. EN 13986:2004+A1:2015). Available online: https://www.internationalplywood.nl/static/uploads-cms2/EN_13986-2004A1-2015.pdf.
56. (2004). Timber Structures—Test Methods—Determination of Mechanical Properties of Wood-Based Panels (Standard No. EN 789:2004). Available online: https://zjz.njfu.edu.cn/DFS//file/2022/07/21/20220721164024580zie9eb.pdf.