journal article·2025-11-28Open access

A Transformer Tube-Based Model Predictive Control Method Under Model Mismatches

Jian Chen, Haiwei Pan, Zhenzhong Xu, Fengming Yu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

In industrial processes, mismatches between models and actual systems often degrade the performance of Model Predictive Control (MPC), potentially leading to instability or safety violations under dynamic operating conditions. To address this challenge, the paper introduces a hybrid control architecture named Trans-Tube-MPC, which leverages Transformer-based temporal modeling and tube-based robust constraints to enhance the robustness of the control system against model failures. The approach employs a Transformer network trained on closed-loop operational data to predict and compensate for state deviations caused by disturbances, while adaptive tube constraints dynamically adjust prediction boundaries to mitigate the risk of overcorrection. The innovation of this method lies in the introduction of a dynamically adjusted tube width, which adapts based on the prediction discrepancy between the Transformer model and the state-space model, thus allowing the control system to remain robust even in the face of model failures. Experimental studies demonstrate that the Trans-Tube-MPC framework can maintain control performance under significant model parameter deviations where conventional MPC would fail. The proposed method provides an effective solution to the problem of model mismatch and prediction error and shows significant advantages in dealing with control issues under model failure conditions, establishing a new way to reconcile data-driven adaptability with the reliability of control systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Control Systems and Identification

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Funding

the Development and Application Project of Ship CAE Software

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Review on model predictive control: An engineering perspective10.1007/s00170-021-07682-3 ↗
2. Model predictive control of microgrids–An overview10.1016/j.rser.2020.110422 ↗
3. MPC: Current practice and challenges10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.12.004 ↗
4. Multivariable MPC system performance assessment, monitoring, and diagnosis10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.07.003 ↗
5. Performance monitoring of model-predictive controllers via model residual assessment10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.01.004 ↗
6. Model predictive control with closed-loop re-identification10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.11.016 ↗
7. All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 ↗
8. A framework of hybrid model development with identification of plant-model mismatch10.1002/aic.16996 ↗
9. Data-driven plant-model mismatch estimation for dynamic matrix control systems10.1002/rnc.5162 ↗
10. Mixed stochastic-deterministic tube MPC for offset-free tracking in the presence of plant-model mismatch10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.04.010 ↗
11. ARX-model based model predictive control with offset-free tracking10.1016/S1570-7946(10)28101-4 ↗
12. Fast offset-free nonlinear model predictive control based on moving horizon estimation10.1021/ie901945y ↗
13. Development of offset-free Koopman Lyapunov-based model predictive control and mathematical analysis for zero steady-state offset condition considering influence of Lyapunov constraints on equilibrium point10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.08.005 ↗
14. Multivariable offset-free MPC with steady-state target calculation and its application to a wind tunnel system10.1016/j.isatra.2019.08.005 ↗
15. Conditions for offset elimination in state space receding horizon controllers: A tutorial analysis10.1016/j.cep.2007.11.011 ↗
16. Iterative learning model predictive control with fuzzy neural network for nonlinear systems10.1109/TFUZZ.2023.3245656 ↗
17. ResNet and PolyNet based identification and (MPC) control of dynamical systems: A promising way10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3196920 ↗
18. Lanzetti, N., Lian, Y.Z., Cortinovis, A., Dominguez, L., Mercangöz, M., and Jones, C. (2019, January 25–28). Recurrent neural network based MPC for process industries. Proceedings of the 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC), Naples, Italy.10.23919/ECC.2019.8795809 ↗
19. Process structure-based recurrent neural network modeling for model predictive control of nonlinear processes10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.03.013 ↗
20. Multistep model predictive control based on artificial neural networks10.1021/ie020703k ↗
21. Generalized predictive control using recurrent fuzzy neural networks for industrial processes10.1016/j.jprocont.2006.08.003 ↗
22. Output tracking of constrained nonlinear processes with offset-free input-to-state stable fuzzy predictive control10.1016/j.automatica.2008.11.016 ↗
23. A review on Kalman filter models10.1007/s11831-022-09815-7 ↗
24. Kalman filter: Historical overview and review of its use in robotics 60 years after its creation10.1155/2021/9674015 ↗
25. A review: State estimation based on hybrid models of Kalman filter and neural network10.1080/21642583.2023.2173682 ↗
26. Rapamycin in the context of Pascal’s Wager: Generative pre-trained transformer perspective10.18632/oncoscience.571 ↗
27. Transformer in transformer
28. A survey on vision transformer10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3152247 ↗
29. Parameter estimation of fractional-order Hammerstein state space system based on the extended Kalman filter10.1002/acs.3602 ↗
30. Feng, Z., Chen, J., Xiao, W., Sun, J., Xin, B., and Wang, G. (2024). Learning Hybrid Policies for MPC with Application to Drone Flight in Unknown Dynamic Environments. arXiv.10.1142/S2301385024410206 ↗