journal article·2025-11-27Open access

Integrating Ensemble Learning with Item Response Theory to Improve the Interpretability of Student Learning Outcome Tracing

Christian Onyeke, Lijun Qian, Pamela Obiomon, Xishuang Dong

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Student learning outcome (SLO) tracing aims to monitor students’ learning progress by predicting their likelihood of passing or failing courses using Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT). However, conventional DKT models often lack interpretability, limiting their adoption in educational settings that require transparent decision-making. To address this challenge, this quantitative study proposes an interpretable ensemble framework that integrates Item Response Theory (IRT) with DKT. Specifically, multiple IRT-based DKT models are developed to capture student ability and item characteristics, and these models are combined using a bagging strategy to enhance predictive performance and robustness. The framework is evaluated on an SLO tracing dataset from Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU), a historically Black college and university (HBCU). Result analysis includes comparisons of evaluation metrics such as Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), and precision across individual and ensemble models, as well as visualizations of student ability, item difficulty, and predicted probabilities to assess interpretability. Experimental results demonstrate that the ensemble approach consistently outperforms single models while providing clear, interpretable insights into student learning dynamics. These findings suggest that integrating ensemble methods with IRT can simultaneously improve prediction accuracy and transparency in SLO tracing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Online Learning and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. A survey on deep learning-based knowledge tracing10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110036 ↗
2. Improving student learning outcome tracing at HBCUs using tabular generative ai and deep knowledge tracing10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3568171 ↗
3. Tracing student learning outcome at Historically Black Colleges and Universities via deep knowledge tracing10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3557316 ↗
4. XKT: Towards explainable knowledge tracing model with cognitive learning theories for questions of multiple knowledge concepts10.1109/TKDE.2024.3418098 ↗
5. Interpreting deep learning models for knowledge tracing10.1007/s40593-022-00297-z ↗
6. A genetic causal explainer for deep knowledge tracing10.1109/TEVC.2023.3286666 ↗
8. Tsutsumi, E., Nishio, T., and Ueno, M. (2024). Deep-IRT with a temporal convolutional network for reflecting students’ long-term history of ability data. Artificial Intelligence in Education, Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Recife, Brazil, 8–12 July 2024, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-64302-6_18 ↗
9. Gu, W., Liu, Z., and Liu, S. (2023, January 11–13). Interpretable deep knowledge tracing with graph relationship information. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Dali, China.10.1109/ICCASIT58768.2023.10351639 ↗
10. Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L.J., and Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2015, January 7–12). Deep knowledge tracing. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, Montreal, QC, Canada.
11. Xu, F., Chen, K., Zhong, M., Liu, L., Liu, H., Luo, X., and Zheng, L. (2024). Dkvmn&mri: A new deep knowledge tracing model based on dkvmn incorporating multi-relational information. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0312022 ↗
12. Advanced knowledge tracing: Incorporating process data and curricula information via an attention-based framework for accuracy and interpretability
13. Learning intention-aware knowledge tracing for learning stage10.1007/s10791-025-09616-z ↗
14. Chen, J., Liu, Z., Huang, S., Liu, Q., and Luo, W. (2023, January 7–14). Improving interpretability of deep sequential knowledge tracing models with question-centric cognitive representations. Proceedings of the 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA.10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26661 ↗
15. Cui, J., Yu, M., Jiang, B., Zhou, A., Wang, J., and Zhang, W. (2024, January 16–19). Interpretable knowledge tracing via response influence-based counterfactual reasoning. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Utrecht, The Netherlands.10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00090 ↗
16. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., and Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Sage.
17. FDKT: Towards an interpretable deep knowledge tracing via fuzzy reasoning10.1145/3656167 ↗
18. Frick, S., Krivosija, A., and Munteanu, A. (2024, January 2–4). Scalable learning of item response theory models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Valencia, Spain.
19. A survey on ensemble learning10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z ↗
20. A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3207287 ↗
21. Ensemble approach based on bagging, boosting and stacking for short-term prediction in agribusiness time series10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105837 ↗
22. Yeung, C.-K. (2019). Deep-IRT: Make deep learning-based knowledge tracing explainable using item response theory. arXiv.
23. Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., and Yeung, D.-Y. (2017, January 3–7). Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’17, Perth, Australia.10.1145/3038912.3052580 ↗
24. A survey on trust evaluation based on machine learning
25. When Is Deep Learn. Best Approach Knowledge Tracing?