journal article·2025-11-27Open access

Complex Network Responses to Regulation of a Brain-Computer Interface During Semi-Naturalistic Behavior

Tengfei Feng, Halim Ibrahim Baqapuri, Jana Zweerings, Klaus Mathiak

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used to monitor and provide real-time feedback on brain signals, directly influencing external systems, such as virtual environments (VE), to support self-regulation. We piloted a novel immersive, first-person shooting BCI-VE during which the avatars’ movement speed was directly influenced by neural activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA). Previous analyses revealed behavioral and localized neural effects for active versus reduced contingency neurofeedback in a randomized controlled trial design. However, the modeling of neural dynamics during such complex tasks challenges traditional event-related approaches. To overcome this limitation, we employed a data-driven framework utilizing group-level independent networks derived from BOLD-specific components of the multi-echo fMRI data obtained during the BCI regulation. Individual responses were estimated through dual regression. The spatial independent components corresponded to established cognitive networks and task-specific networks related to gaming actions. Compared to reduced contingency neurofeedback, active regulation induced significantly elevated fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) in a frontoparietal control network, and spatial reweighting of a salience/ventral attention network, with stronger expression in SMA, prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, and occipital regions. These findings underscore the distributed network engagement of BCI regulation during a behavioral task in an immersive virtual environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116620, China

JARA-Translational Brain Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Department of Epileptology and Neurology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · German Ministry for Education and Research

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Brain–Computer Interfaces: The Innovative Key to Unlocking Neurological Conditions10.1097/JS9.0000000000002022 ↗
2. Interface, Interaction, and Intelligence in Generalized Brain–Computer Interfaces10.1016/j.tics.2021.04.003 ↗
3. Closed-Loop Brain Training: The Science of Neurofeedback10.1038/nrn.2016.164 ↗
4. fMRI Feedback Enhances Emotion Regulation as Evidenced by a Reduced Amygdala Response10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.027 ↗
5. Rt-fMRI Neurofeedback-Guided Cognitive Reappraisal Training Modulates Amygdala Responsivity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102483 ↗
6. Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Compared to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in a Pilot Study for the Treatment of Mild and Moderate Depression10.1007/s00406-022-01462-0 ↗
7. Self-Navigating the “Island of Reil”: A Systematic Review of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training of Insula Activity10.1038/s41398-025-03382-8 ↗
8. Pindi, P., Houenou, J., Piguet, C., and Favre, P. (2022). Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback as a New Treatment for Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, 119.10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110605 ↗
9. Baqapuri, H.I., Roes, L.D., Zvyagintsev, M., Ramadan, S., Kell, M., Roecher, E., Zweerings, J., Klasen, M., Gur, R.C., and Mathiak, K. (2021). A Novel Brain–Computer Interface Virtual Environment for Neurofeedback During Functional MRI. Front. Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnins.2020.593854 ↗
10. Watve, A., Haugg, A., Frei, N., Koush, Y., Willinger, D., Bruehl, A.B., Stämpfli, P., Scharnowski, F., and Sladky, R. (2024). Facing Emotions: Real-Time fMRI-Based Neurofeedback Using Dynamic Emotional Faces to Modulate Amygdala Activity. Front. Neurosci., 17.10.3389/fnins.2023.1286665 ↗
11. Du, B., Cheng, X., Duan, Y., and Ning, H. (2022). fMRI Brain Decoding and Its Applications in Brain–Computer Interface: A Survey. Brain Sci., 12.10.3390/brainsci12020228 ↗
12. Wen, D., Wei, Z., Zhou, Y., Li, G., Zhang, X., and Han, W. (2018). Deep Learning Methods to Process fMRI Data and Their Application in the Diagnosis of Cognitive Impairment: A Brief Overview and Our Opinion. Front. Neuroinform., 12.10.3389/fninf.2018.00023 ↗
13. Cui, W., Wang, Z., and Ma, L. (2025). SED-GPT: A Non-Invasive Method for Long-Sequence Fine-Grained Semantics and Emotions Decoding. Appl. Sci., 15.10.20944/preprints202508.1518.v1 ↗
14. Floren, A., Naylor, B., Miikkulainen, R., and Ress, D. (2015). Accurately Decoding Visual Information from fMRI Data Obtained in a Realistic Virtual Environment. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9.10.3389/fnhum.2015.00327 ↗
15. Guo, J., Yi, C., Li, F., Xu, P., and Tian, Y. (2024, January 14–16). MindLDM: Reconstruct Visual Stimuli from fMRI Using Latent Diffusion Model. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA), Xi’an, China.10.1109/CIVEMSA58715.2024.10586647 ↗
16. Rithwik, P., Benzy, V.K., and Vinod, A.P. (2022). High Accuracy Decoding of Motor Imagery Directions from EEG-Based Brain Computer Interface Using Filter Bank Spatially Regularised Common Spatial Pattern Method. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 72.10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103241 ↗
17. Deep Learning for Neural Decoding in Motor Cortex10.1088/1741-2552/ac8fb5 ↗
18. Spatio-Temporal Transformers for Decoding Neural Movement Control10.1088/1741-2552/adaef0 ↗
19. Kober, S.E., Wood, G., and Berger, L.M. (2024). Controlling Virtual Reality With Brain Signals: State of the Art of Using VR-Based Feedback in Neurofeedback Applications. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback.10.1007/s10484-024-09677-8 ↗
20. Piszcz, A., Rojek, I., and Mikołajewski, D. (2024). Impact of Virtual Reality on Brain–Computer Interface Performance in IoT Control—Review of Current State of Knowledge. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210541 ↗
21. Castanho, L., Martinho, D.V., Saial, A.C., Gouveia, B.R., Gouveia, É.R., and Ribeiro, F. (2025). The Efficacy of Virtual Reality-Based EEG Neurofeedback in Health-Related Symptoms Relief: A Systematic Review. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback.10.1007/s10484-025-09730-0 ↗
22. Emotional Self-Regulation, Virtual Reality and Neurofeedback10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100101 ↗
23. An Electroencephalography-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Emotion Regulation With Virtual Reality Neurofeedback10.1109/TCDS.2024.3357547 ↗
24. Key Issues in Decomposing fMRI during Naturalistic and Continuous Music Experience with Independent Component Analysis10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.11.025 ↗
25. Basic Stimulus Processing Alterations from Top-down Cognitive Control in Depression Drive Independent Temporal Components of Multi-Echo Naturalistic fMRI Data10.1038/s41398-025-03386-4 ↗
26. Data-Driven Tensor Independent Component Analysis for Model-Based Connectivity Neurofeedback10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.067 ↗
27. Distinct Patterns of Brain Activity in Young Carriers of the APOE-Ε4 Allele10.1073/pnas.0811879106 ↗
28. Nickerson, L.D., Smith, S.M., Öngür, D., and Beckmann, C.F. (2017). Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses. Front. Neurosci., 11.10.3389/fnins.2017.00115 ↗
29. Group ICA for Identifying Biomarkers in Schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ Networks via Spatially Constrained ICA Show More Sensitivity to Group Differences than Spatio-Temporal Regression10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747 ↗
30. Comparison of PCA Approaches for Very Large Group ICA10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.047 ↗
31. Hu, G., Waters, A.B., Aslan, S., Frederick, B., Cong, F., and Nickerson, L.D. (2020). Snowball ICA: A Model Order Free Independent Component Analysis Strategy for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data. Front. Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnins.2020.569657 ↗
32. Characterizing the Distribution of Neural and Non-Neural Components in Multi-Echo EPI Data across Echo Times Based on Tensor-ICA10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121199 ↗
33. BOLD Sensitivity and SNR Characteristics of Parallel Imaging-Accelerated Single-Shot Multi-Echo EPI for fMRI10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.007 ↗
34. Comparison of Multi-Subject ICA Methods for Analysis of fMRI Data10.1002/hbm.21170 ↗
35. An Improved Approach to Detection of Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) for Resting-State fMRI: Fractional ALFF10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012 ↗
36. Large-Scale Brain Networks and Psychopathology: A Unifying Triple Network Model10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 ↗
37. Multi-Task Connectivity Reveals Flexible Hubs for Adaptive Task Control10.1038/nn.3470 ↗
38. Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback: Progress and Challenges10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033 ↗
39. A Critical Role for the Right Fronto-Insular Cortex in Switching between Central-Executive and Default-Mode Networks10.1073/pnas.0800005105 ↗
40. Stein, J., Korb, F.M., Goschke, T., and Zwosta, K. (2025). Salience Network Resting-State Functional Connectivity Predicts Self-Controlled Decision-Making. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-98673-x ↗
41. Schimmelpfennig, J., Topczewski, J., Zajkowski, W., and Jankowiak-Siuda, K. (2023). The Role of the Salience Network in Cognitive and Affective Deficits. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 17.10.3389/fnhum.2023.1133367 ↗
42. Functional Role of the Supplementary and Pre-Supplementary Motor Areas10.1038/nrn2478 ↗
43. Naturalistic Stimuli in Neuroscience: Critically Acclaimed10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.004 ↗
44. Toward Brain Correlates of Natural Behavior: fMRI during Violent Video Games10.1002/hbm.20234 ↗