PDCA-Based Methodology for the Evaluation of Energy Efficiency in the Industrial Sector
Source abstract
Abstract
Reducing energy consumption and improving energy efficiency are essential objectives in the productive sector to ensure economic growth and reduce emissions. However, some energy management models do not include tools such as the balanced scorecard (BSC) and energy-based key performance indicators (KPIs). These tools help organisations make decisions and support continuous improvement actions. To address this gap, this study developed a methodology to facilitate the implementation of an Energy Management System. Specifically, this system evaluates the energy performance of processes within the abrasives industry, using KPIs based on energy efficiency. The proposed model, based on the Deming Cycle (PDCA, Plan-Do-Check-Act), consists of three stages: first, profiling and planning; second, implementation and maintenance; and third, surveillance. To support these stages, the main KPIs of energy typology were determined using AHP. Following this, the KPIs were prioritised based on energy efficiency. The results indicate that the company’s highest priority is meeting international goals, followed by reducing production costs and avoiding energy-related penalties. The energy baseline developed through regression analysis yielded a coefficient of 0.7794 and a specific consumption of 0.0345 kWh per manufactured piece for electricity alone, which increases by 107.25% when all energy sources used in the process are included. Within this context, the key indicators for monitoring energy efficiency strategies were established, demonstrating that model-assisted energy management not only supports the identification of improvement opportunities and internal control of production parameters but also provides a robust framework for evaluating, measuring, reporting, and improving energy efficiency targets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy Efficiency and Management · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana 22424, Mexico
Tecnología Ambiental y Energías Renovables, Tecnología Ambiental, Posgrado e Investigación, Universidad Tecnológica de Tijuana, Tijuana 22253, Mexico
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Gestión energética empresarial una metodología para la reducción de consumo de energía
2. Assessing the Eco-Efficiency of U.S. Manufacturing Industries with a Focus on Renewable vs. Non-Renewable Energy Use: An Integrated Time Series MRIO and DEA Approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119630 ↗
3. Impact of Foreign Trade on Energy Efficiency in China’s Textile Industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118878 ↗
4. Organizational Human Factors as Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Electrical Motors Systems in Industry10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.024 ↗
5. Energy Education: Breaking up the Rational Energy Use Barriers10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00100-9 ↗
6. Application of Machine Learning Tools for Energy Efficiency in Industry: A Review10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.035 ↗
7. A Decision Support Tool for Cement Industry to Select Energy Efficiency Measures10.1016/j.esr.2020.100458 ↗
8. Driving Competitive Advantage through Energy Efficiency in Mexican Maquiladoras10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.253 ↗
9. Energy Management in Production: A Novel Method to Develop Key Performance Indicators for Improving Energy Efficiency10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.065 ↗
10. Implementing Key Performance Indicators for Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.131 ↗
11. Lawrence, A., Thollander, P., Andrei, M., and Karlsson, M. (2019). Specific Energy Consumption/Use (SEC) in Energy Management for Improving Energy Efficiency in Industry: Meaning, Usage and Differences. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12020247 ↗
12. Rosas-Moya, R. (2024, May 28). Guía Para Realizar Diagnósticos Energéticos y Evaluar Medidas de Ahorro En Equipos de Bombeo de Agua de Organismos Operadores de Agua Potable. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/268483/Gu_a_para_realizar_diagn_sticos_energ_ticos_y_evaluar_medidas_de_ahorro.pdf.
13. Samitier, L. (2024, June 14). ISO 50001 en la Industria de Procesos. Available online: https://es.linkedin.com/pulse/iso-50001-en-la-industria-de-procesos-luciano-samitier.
14. Key Performance Indicators for Energy Management in the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.004 ↗
15. El MGIE, un modelo de gestión energética para el sector productivo nacional
16. Cleaner Production and PDCA Cycle: Practical Application for Reducing the Cans Loss Index in a Beverage Company10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.033 ↗
17. Development of Conceptual Framework and Indicators for Assessment of Power Development Fund in Thailand
18. Szabo, Z.K., Szádoczki, Z., Bozóki, S., Stănciulescu, G.C., and Szabo, D. (2021). An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13042254 ↗
19. Taylan, O., Alamoudi, R., Kabli, M., AlJifri, A., Ramzi, F., and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Assessment of Energy Systems Using Extended Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS Approaches to Manage Non-Cooperative Opinions. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072745 ↗
20. Liang, G., Niu, D., and Liang, Y. (2021). Sustainability Evaluation of Renewable Energy Incubators Using Interval Type-II Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS with MEA-MLSSVM. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13041796 ↗
21. An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Renewable Energy Sources
22. Marr, B. (2012). Key Performance Indicators, Financial Times Press. [1st ed.].
23. Tseng, Y.-C., Lee, D., Lin, C.-F., and Chang, C.-Y. (2016). The Energy Savings and Environmental Benefits for Small and Medium Enterprises by Cloud Energy Management System. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8060531 ↗
24. Maxwell, J.A. (2005). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, SAGE.
25. Energy Management in Manufacturing: From Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.191 ↗
26. Millán, G., Llano, E., Globisch, J., Durand, A., Hettesheimer, T., and Alcalde, E. (2020). Increasing Energy Efficiency in the Food and Beverage Industry: A Human-Centered Design Approach. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12177037 ↗
27. Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS)
28. de Luis-Ruiz, J.M., Salas-Menocal, B.R., Pereda-García, R., Pérez-Álvarez, R., Sedano-Cibrián, J., and Ruiz-Fernández, C. (2024). Optimal Location of Solar Photovoltaic Plants Using Geographic Information Systems and Multi-Criteria Analysis. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16072895 ↗
29. Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) In Manufacturing And Non-Manufacturing Industries: A Systematic Literature Review
30. Cacal, J.C., Taboada, E.B., and Mehboob, M.S. (2023). Strategic Implementation of Integrated Water Resource Management in Selected Areas of Palawan: SWOT-AHP Method. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15042922 ↗
31. Chandra Bose, D. (2012). Principles of Management and Administration, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.. [2nd ed.].
32. SEMARNAT (2025, September 30). Factor de emisión del sistema eléctrico nacional. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/981194/aviso_fesen_2024.pdf.
33. Gobierno de México (2025, October 23). Factores de Emision. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/235891/FACTORES_DE_EMISION_2015.pdf.
34. The Investor Confidence Project (2025, October 20). Project Development Specification—Industry and Energy Supply. Available online: https://ee-ip.org/fileadmin/user_upload/DOCUMENTS/Content/ICP_PDS_INDUSTRY_2018_ENG.pdf.
35. The Australasian Energy Performance Contracting Association (2004). Best Practice Guide to Measurement and Verification of Energy Savings: A Companion Document to “A Best Practice Guide to Energy Performance Contracts”, Australasian Energy Performance Contracting Association.
36. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2025, October 20). M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Performance-Based Contracts Version 5.0, Available online: https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/mv_guide_5_0.pdf.
37. AP Automatización (2025, October 02). Ajuste en las Tarifas Eléctricas Y Cambios en el Factor de Potencia. Available online: https://ap-automatizacion.com/noticias/cambios-en-el-factor-de-potencia/.
38. AP Automatización (2025, October 02). ¿Recibiste un cargo por bajo Factor de Potencia en el recibo CFE?. Available online: https://ap-automatizacion.com/noticias/recibiste-un-cargo-por-bajo-factor-de-potencia-en-tu-factura-de-cfe/.
39. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2025, October 24). Executive Summary—Energy Management for Industry—Analysis. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-management-for-industry/executive-summary.
40. International Energy Agency (2017). Energy Efficiency 2017, OECD. Energy Efficiency.10.1787/9789264284234-en ↗