journal article·2025-11-26Open access

Recent Advances in B-Mode Ultrasound Simulators

Cindy M. Solano-Cordero, Nerea Encina-Baranda, Mailyn Pérez-Liva, Joaquin L. Herraiz

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) imaging is one of the most accessible, non-invasive, and real-time diagnostic techniques in clinical medicine. However, conventional B-mode US suffers from intrinsic limitations such as speckle noise, operator dependence, and variability in image interpretation, which reduce diagnostic reproducibility and hinder skill acquisition. Because accurate image acquisition and interpretation rely heavily on the operator’s experience, mastering ultrasound requires extensive hands-on training under diverse anatomical and pathological conditions. Yet, traditional educational settings rarely provide consistent exposure to such variability, making simulation-based environments essential for developing and standardizing operator expertise. This scoping review synthesizes advances from 2014 to 2024 in B-mode ultrasound simulation, identifying 80 studies through structured searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE. Simulation methods were organized into interpolative, wave-based, ray-based, and convolution-based models, as well as emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven approaches. The review emphasizes recent simulation engines and toolboxes reported in this period and highlights the growing role of learning-based pipelines (e.g., Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion) for realism, scalability, and data augmentation. The results show steady progress toward high realism and computational efficiency, including Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)-accelerated transport models, physics-informed convolution, and AI-enhanced translation and synthesis. Remaining challenges include the modeling of nonlinear and dynamic effects at scale, standardizing evaluation across tasks, and integrating physics with learning to balance fidelity and speed. These findings outline current capabilities and future directions for training, validation, and diagnostic support in ultrasound imaging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Ultrasound in Clinical Applications · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nuclear Physics Group and IPARCOS, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, CEI Moncloa, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Tasnim, T., Shuvo, M.M.H., and Hasan, S. (2017, January 28–30). Study of Speckle Noise Reduction from Ultrasound B-Mode Images Using Different Filtering Techniques. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICAEE.2017.8255358 ↗
2. The Ultrasound Use of Simulators, Current View, and Perspectives: Requirements and Technical Aspects (WFUMB State of the Art Paper)10.4103/EUS-D-22-00197 ↗
3. Simulation-Based Training in Ultrasound—Where Are We Now?10.1055/a-1352-5944 ↗
4. Toward a Real-Time Simulation of Ultrasound Image Sequences Based On a 3-D Set of Moving Scatterers10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1299 ↗
5. Law, Y.C., Knott, T., Hentschel, B., and Kuhlen, T. (2012). Geometrical-Acoustics-Based Ultrasound Image Simulation. Eurographics Workshop Vis. Comput. Biol. Med., 25–32.
6. B-Mode Ultrasound Image Simulation in Deformable 3-D Medium10.1109/TMI.2009.2016561 ↗
7. Real-Time Ultrasonography Simulator Based on 3D CT-Scan Images
8. Real-Time Simulation of Medical Ultrasound from CT Images
9. Fast Simulation of Ultrasound Images from a CT Volume10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.12.009 ↗
10. Interactive Development of a CT-Based Tissue Model for Ultrasound Simulation10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.02.006 ↗
11. Fast and Automatic Ultrasound Simulation from CT Images10.1155/2013/327613 ↗
12. Real-Time GPU-Based Ultrasound Simulation Using Deformable Mesh Models10.1109/TMI.2012.2234474 ↗
13. A Heterogeneous Nonlinear Attenuating Full-Wave Model of Ultrasound10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1066 ↗
14. Visualization and GPU-Accelerated Simulation of Medical Ultrasound from CT Images10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.12.011 ↗
15. Ultrasound Goes GPU: Real-Time Simulation Using CUDA
16. Spatially Variant Ultrasound Image Restoration with Product Convolution10.1109/TUFFC.2025.3584533 ↗
17. A Fast Convolution-Based Methodology to Simulate 2-Dd/3-D Cardiac Ultrasound Images10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1051 ↗
18. Jensen, J.A. (2004, January 15–18). Simulation of Advanced Ultrasound Systems Using Field II. Proceedings of the 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821), Arlington, VA, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2004.1398618 ↗
19. FIELD: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems
20. Zhu, Y., Szabo, T.L., and McGough, R.J. (2012, January 7–10). A Comparison of Ultrasound Image Simulations with FOCUS and Field II. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Dresden, Germany.10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0425 ↗
21. Treeby, B.E., and Cox, B.T. (2010). K-Wave: MATLAB Toolbox for the Simulation and Reconstruction of Photoacoustic Wave Fields. J. Biomed. Opt., 15.10.1117/1.3360308 ↗
22. Holm, S. (2001, January 17–18). Ultrasim-a Toolbox for Ultrasound Field Simulation. Proceedings of the Nordic MATLAB Conference Proceedings, Oslo, Norway.
23. Varray, F., Cachard, C., Tortoli, P., and Basset, O. (2010, January 11–14). Nonlinear Radio Frequency Image Simulation for Harmonic Imaging: Creanuis. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.5935538 ↗
24. Transfer Learning with Pre-Trained Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Automatic Assessment of Liver Steatosis in Ultrasound Images
25. Automatic Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation of Ultrasound Thyroid Cineclips Using Recurrent Fully Convolutional Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045906 ↗
26. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation10.7326/M18-0850 ↗
27. Rodriguez-Molares, A., Rindal, O.M.H., Bernard, O., Nair, A., Lediju Bell, M.A., Liebgott, H., Austeng, A., and L⊘vstakken, L. (2017, January 6–9). The UltraSound ToolBox. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ULTSYM.2017.8092389 ↗
28. Garcia, D. (2021, January 11–16). Make the Most of MUST, an Open-Source Matlab UltraSound Toolbox. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Xi’an, China.10.1109/IUS52206.2021.9593605 ↗
29. mSOUND: An Open Source Toolbox for Modeling Acoustic Wave Propagation in Heterogeneous Media10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3051729 ↗
30. Garcia, D. (2022). SIMUS: An Open-Source Simulator for Medical Ultrasound Imaging. Part I: Theory & Examples. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 218.10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106726 ↗
31. Cigier, A., Varray, F., and Garcia, D. (2022). SIMUS: An Open-Source Simulator for Medical Ultrasound Imaging. Part II: Comparison with Four Simulators. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 220.10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106774 ↗
32. Ekroll, I.K., Saris, A.E.C.M., and Avdal, J. (2023). FLUST: A Fast, Open Source Framework for Ultrasound Blood Flow Simulations. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 238.10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107604 ↗
33. Blanken, N., Heiles, B., Kuliesh, A., Versuis, M., Jain, K., Maresca, D., and Lajoinie, G. (2024). PROTEUS: A Physically Realistic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Simulator—Part I: Numerical Methods. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 1.10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3427850 ↗
34. QUPS: A MATLAB Toolbox for Rapid Prototyping of Ultrasound Beamforming and Imaging Techniques10.21105/joss.06772 ↗
35. Garcia, D., and Varray, F. (2024). SIMUS3: An Open-Source Simulator for 3-D Ultrasound Imaging. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 250.10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108169 ↗
36. Efficient Scatter Model for Simulation of Ultrasound Images from Computed Tomography Data
37. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., and Frangi, A. (2015, January 5–9). Patient-Specific 3D Ultrasound Simulation Based on Convolutional Ray-Tracing and Appearance Optimization. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015, Munich, Germany.
38. Real-Time Simulation of Ultrasound Refraction Phenomena Using Ray-Trace Based Wavefront Construction Method10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.07.034 ↗
39. Rubi, P., Vera, E.F., Larrabide, J., Calvo, M., D’Amato, J.P., and Larrabide, I. (2017, January 5–7). Comparison of Real-Time Ultrasound Simulation Models Using Abdominal CT Images. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis, Tandil, Argentina.10.1117/12.2255741 ↗
40. Cardoso, M.J., Arbel, T., Tavares, J.M.R.S., Aylward, S., Li, S., Boctor, E., Fichtinger, G., Cleary, K., Freeman, B., and Kohli, L. (2017, January 14). Simulation of Patient-Specific Deformable Ultrasound Imaging in Real Time. Proceedings of the Imaging for Patient-Customized Simulations and Systems for Point-of-Care Ultrasound, Québec City, QC, Canada.10.1007/978-3-319-67552-7 ↗
41. Satheesh B., A., and Thittai, A.K. (2018, January 4–7). A Method of Ultrasound Simulation from Patient-Specific CT Image Data: A Preliminary Simulation Study. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363853 ↗
42. A Fast Method for Simulating Ultrasound Image from Patient-Specific CT Data10.1016/j.bspc.2018.10.003 ↗
43. Greenspan, H., Madabhushi, A., Mousavi, P., Salcudean, S., Duncan, J., Syeda-Mahmood, T., and Taylor, R. (2023, January 8–12). LOTUS: Learning to Optimize Task-Based US Representations. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1007/978-3-031-43904-9 ↗
44. Linte, C.A., Yaniv, Z., Fallavollita, P., Abolmaesumi, P., and Holmes, D.R. (2014, January 14). Simulation of Ultrasound Images for Validation of MR to Ultrasound Registration in Neurosurgery. Proceedings of the Augmented Environments for Computer-Assisted Interventions, Boston, MA, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-10437-9 ↗
45. Storve, S., and Torp, H. (2015, January 21–24). Use of B-Splines in Fast Dynamic Ultrasound RF Simulations. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ULTSYM.2015.0193 ↗
46. A Pipeline for the Generation of Realistic 3D Synthetic Echocardiographic Sequences: Methodology and Open-Access Database10.1109/TMI.2015.2396632 ↗
47. Alessandrini, M., Heyde, B., Giffard-Roisin, S., Delingette, H., Sermesant, M., Allain, P., Bernard, O., De Craene, M., and D’hooge, J. (2015, January 16–19). Generation of Ultra-Realistic Synthetic Echocardiographic Sequences to Facilitate Standardization of Deformation Imaging. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Brooklyn, NY, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163982 ↗
48. Real-Time Ultrasound Simulation for Training of US-Guided Needle Insertion in Breathing Virtual Patients
49. A Framework for the Generation of Realistic Synthetic Cardiac Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences From the Same Virtual Patients10.1109/TMI.2017.2708159 ↗
50. Realistic Vendor-Specific Synthetic Ultrasound Data for Quality Assurance of 2-D Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Simulation Pipeline and Open Access Database10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2786300 ↗
51. Szostek, K., Lasek, J., and Piórkowski, A. (2023). Real-Time Simulation of Wave Phenomena in Lung Ultrasound Imaging. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13179805 ↗
52. Abhimanyu, F.N.U., Orekhov, A.L., Galeotti, J., and Choset, H. (2023). Unsupervised Deformable Image Registration for Respiratory Motion Compensation in Ultrasound Images. arXiv.
53. Velikova, Y., Azampour, M.F., Simson, W., Esposito, M., and Navab, N. (2024, January 13–17). Implicit Neural Representations for Breathing-Compensated Volume Reconstruction in Robotic Ultrasound. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611443 ↗
54. Large-Scale Simulation of Realistic Cardiac Ultrasound Data with Clinical Appearance: Methodology and Open-Access Database10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3447528 ↗
55. Mattausch, O., and Goksel, O. (2015, January 25–29). Scatterer Reconstruction and Parametrization of Homogeneous Tissue for Ultrasound Image Simulation. Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy.10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319845 ↗
56. Tsaftaris, S.A., Gooya, A., Frangi, A.F., and Prince, J.L. (2016). Image-Based PSF Estimation for Ultrasound Training Simulation. Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, SASHIMI 2024, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-46630-9 ↗
57. Singh, P., Mukundan, R., and de Ryke, R. (2017, January 16–18). Synthetic Models of Ultrasound Image Formation for Speckle Noise Simulation and Analysis. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Signals and Systems (ICSigSys), Bali, Indonesia.10.1109/ICSIGSYS.2017.7967056 ↗
58. Singh, P., Mukundan, R., and de Ryke, R. (2017, January 4–6). Quality Analysis of Synthetic Ultrasound Images Using Co-Occurrence Texture Statistics. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ), Christchurch, New Zealand.10.1109/IVCNZ.2017.8402511 ↗
59. Valdés Hernández, M., and González-Castro, V. (2017, January 11–13). Modelling, Speckle Simulation and Quality Evaluation of Synthetic Ultrasound Images. Proceedings of the Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Edinburgh, UK.
60. Image-Based Reconstruction of Tissue Scatterers Using Beam Steering for Ultrasound Simulation10.1109/TMI.2017.2770118 ↗
61. Singh, P., Mukundan, R., and De Ryke, R. (2018). Texture Based Quality Analysis of Simulated Synthetic Ultrasound Images Using Local Binary Patterns. J. Imaging, 4.10.20944/preprints201710.0181.v1 ↗
62. Ultrasound Simulation with Deformable and Patient-Specific Scatterer Maps10.1007/s11548-019-02054-5 ↗
63. Gaits, F., Mellado, N., and Basarab, A. (September, January 29). Efficient 2D Ultrasound Simulation Based on Dart-Throwing 3D Scatterer Sampling. Proceedings of the 2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Belgrade, Serbia.10.23919/EUSIPCO55093.2022.9909587 ↗
64. Efficient Stratified 3-D Scatterer Sampling for Freehand Ultrasound:Simulation10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3324014 ↗
65. Three Dimensional Full-Wave Nonlinear Acoustic Simulations: Applications to Ultrasound Imaging10.1063/1.4934438 ↗
66. Unsupervised Clustering Method to Convert High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Volumes to Three-Dimensional Acoustic Models for Full-Wave Ultrasound Simulations10.1117/1.JMI.6.3.037001 ↗
67. Pinton, G. (2020). Ultrasound Imaging of the Human Body with Three Dimensional Full-Wave Nonlinear Acoustics. Part 1: Simulations Methods. arXiv.
68. Pinton, G. (2020). Ultrasound Imaging with Three Dimensional Full-Wave Nonlinear Acoustic Simulations. Part 2: Sources of Image Degradation in Intercostal Imaging. arXiv.
69. Varray, F., Liebgott, H., Cachard, C., and Vray, D. (2014, January 3–6). Fast Simulation of Realistic Pseudo-Acoustic Nonlinear Radio-Frequency Ultrasound Images. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0552 ↗
70. Haigh, A.A., and McCreath, E.C. (2014, January 19–23). Acceleration of GPU-Based Ultrasound Simulation via Data Compression. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1109/IPDPSW.2014.140 ↗
71. Mattausch, O., and Goksel, O. (2016, January 7–9). Monte-Carlo Ray-Tracing for Realistic Interactive Ultrasound Simulation. Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine, Bergen, Norway.
72. Law, Y., Kuhlen, T., and Cotin, S. (2016). Real-Time Simulation of B-Mode Ultrasound Images for Medical Training, RWTH Aachen University.
73. GPU-Based Simulation of Ultrasound Imaging Artifacts for Cryosurgery Training10.1177/1533034615623062 ↗
74. Fast Simulation of Dynamic Ultrasound Images Using the GPU10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2731944 ↗
75. Realistic Ultrasound Simulation of Complex Surface Models Using Interactive Monte-Carlo Path Tracing10.1111/cgf.13260 ↗
76. Multi-Ray Medical Ultrasound Simulation without Explicit Speckle Modelling10.1007/s11548-018-1760-4 ↗
77. Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., and Fichtinger, G. (2018, January 16–20). Framework for Fusion of Data- and Model-Based Approaches for Ultrasound Simulation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain.10.1007/978-3-030-00931-1 ↗
78. Wang, Q., Peng, B., Cao, Z., Huang, X., and Jiang, J. (11, January 11–14). A Real-Time Ultrasound Simulator Using Monte-Carlo Path Tracing in Conjunction with Optix Engine. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283057 ↗
79. High Performance Ultrasound Simulation Using Monte-Carlo Simulation: A GPU Ray-Tracing Implementation
80. Amadou, A.A., Peralta, L., Dryburgh, P., Klein, P., Petkov, K., Housden, R.J., Singh, V., Liao, R., Kim, Y.-H., and Ghesu, F.C. (2024). Cardiac Ultrasound Simulation for Autonomous Ultrasound Navigation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 11.10.3389/fcvm.2024.1384421 ↗
81. Peng, B., Huang, X., Wang, S., and Jiang, J. (2019, January 22–25). A Real-Time Medical Ultrasound Simulator Based on a Generative Adversarial Network Model. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICIP.2019.8803570 ↗
82. Abdi, A.H., Tsang, T., and Abolmaesumi, P. (2019). GAN-Enhanced Conditional Echocardiogram Generation. arXiv.
83. Papież, B.W., Namburete, A.I.L., Yaqub, M., and Noble, J.A. (2020, January 15–17). Deep Generative Models to Simulate 2D Patient-Specific Ultrasound Images in Real Time. Proceedings of the Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Oxford, UK.
84. Deep Network for Scatterer Distribution Estimation for Ultrasound Image Simulation10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3018424 ↗
85. Zhang, L., Portenier, T., Paulus, C., and Goksel, O. (2020, January 4–8). Deep Image Translation for Enhancing Simulated Ultrasound Images. Proceedings of the Medical Ultrasound, and Preterm, Perinatal and Paediatric Image Analysis: First International Workshop, ASMUS 2020, and 5th International Workshop, PIPPI 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru. Proceedings.10.1007/978-3-030-60334-2_9 ↗
86. Improving Realism in Patient-Specific Abdominal Ultrasound Simulation Using CycleGANs10.1007/s11548-019-02046-5 ↗
87. Burgos, N., Svoboda, D., Wolterink, J.M., and Zhao, C. (2020, January 4). UltraGAN: Ultrasound Enhancement Through Adversarial Generation. Proceedings of the Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging, Lima, Peru.
88. Pigeau, G., Elbatarny, L., Wu, V., Schonewille, A., Fichtinger, G., and Ungi, T. (2020, January 15–20). Ultrasound Image Simulation with Generative Adversarial Network. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2020: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, Houston, TX, USA.10.1117/12.2549592 ↗
89. Cronin, N.J., Finni, T., and Seynnes, O. (2020). Using Deep Learning to Generate Synthetic B-Mode Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Images. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 196.10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105583 ↗
90. Ao, Y., Yang, H., Wei, G., Ji, B., Shi, W., and Jiang, Z. (2021, January 23–26). An Impoved U-GAT-IT Model for Enhancing the Realism of Simulated Ultrasound Images. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science (EIECS), Changchun, China.10.1109/EIECS53707.2021.9588054 ↗
91. Generating Synthetic Labeled Data From Existing Anatomical Models: An Example with Echocardiography Segmentation10.1109/TMI.2021.3051806 ↗
92. Learning Ultrasound Rendering from Cross-Sectional Model Slices for Simulated Training10.1007/s11548-021-02349-6 ↗
93. CT2US: Cross-Modal Transfer Learning for Kidney Segmentation in Ultrasound Images with Synthesized Data10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106706 ↗
94. GANs for Generation of Synthetic Ultrasound Images from Small Datasets10.1515/cdbme-2022-0005 ↗
95. A Domain Translation Framework with an Adversarial Denoising Diffusion Model to Generate Synthetic Datasets of Echocardiography Images10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3246762 ↗
96. Chen, L., Liao, H., Kong, W., Zhang, D., and Chen, F. (2023). Anatomy Preserving GAN for Realistic Simulation of Intraoperative Liver Ultrasound Images. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 240.10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107642 ↗
97. Approaches and Limitations of Machine Learning for Synthetic Ultrasound Generation10.1002/jum.16332 ↗
98. Kainz, B., Noble, A., Schnabel, J., Khanal, B., Müller, J.P., and Day, T. (2023, January 8). Echo from Noise: Synthetic Ultrasound Image Generation Using Diffusion Models for Real Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the Simplifying Medical Ultrasound, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
99. Ghosh, R.K., and Sheet, D. (2024, January 27–29). Zero-Shot Multi-Frequency Ultrasound Simulation Using Physics Informed GAN. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE South Asian Ultrasonics Symposium (SAUS), Gujarat, India.10.1109/SAUS61785.2024.10563470 ↗
100. Synthesizing Real-Time Ultrasound Images of Muscle Based on Biomechanical Simulation and Conditional Diffusion Network10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3445434 ↗