journal article·2025-11-22Open access

Impact of Fertilization with Cattle Slurry in a Poplar Short Rotation Coppice on Mass Balance of Nutrients and Biomass Productivity

Abel Rodrigues, Sofia Pereira, Alberto Azevedo Gomes, José Louzada, Alexandre B. Gonçalves, Teresa Fonseca, Amélia Castelo-Branco, Paula Castro, Helena Moreira, Regina Menino

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

The incorporation of cattle slurry in soil in short-rotation-cycle poplar cultivations can be a win–win strategy, insofar as a main feedstock derived from local intensive dairy cattle breeding can be used as a natural fertilizer and in bioenergy produced in the same region. The circularity of this process can contribute to boosting local socio-economic value. In this context, this work involved the installation of a poplar SRC plantation with a density of 5330 trees ha−1 in a 4000 m2 moderately fertile flat site, which was formerly used as a vineyard. Mechanical dosages of slurry of 0, 26.6, 53.2, and 106.5 Mg ha−1, designated as treatments T0, T1, T2, and T3, were applied three times per year during 2019, 2020, and 2021. The variables quantified were related to plant growth, biomass productivity and mass balances of K, P, Cu, Zn, Mg, and N, and organic matter in the whole soil, plant, and slurry system during the first rotation cycle. For treatments T0 and T1, all these seven chemical components showed positive balances in the system, with cumulative demand by soil and biomass being higher than cumulative supply by slurry. Negative balances occurred for P with T2 and T3 and for Zn with T3, so that an overall condition of nutrient saturation of the whole system was not achieved. A no-slurry application, or at most a moderate application equivalent to T1, in the second rotation cycle should therefore be prescribed to allow a nutrient equilibrium status to be achieved through internal seasonal recycling mechanisms. The biomass average productivities ranged from 6.1 to 11.8 Mg ha−1 y−1, peaking under treatment T2, and are within the typical values for a first rotation cycle for poplar SRCs. The biomass fuel quality was not affected by the slurry treatments. A good performance of plant total height and growth in diameter at breast height suggested that poplar trees were not stressed by the applied slurry. Only treatment T1 could assure that cattle CO2-eq methane emissions were overall equilibrated by the carbon sequestration from poplar cultivation, with an absence of climatic-warming impacts. Treatments T2 and T3 could only partially minimize that impact, which would always exist. Globally, this site-specific analysis showed that, under moderately fertile conditions, controlled cattle slurry fertilization of poplar SRC cultivations, which would assure a long-term steady-state equilibrium, can be a viable option to contribute to decentralized production of bioenergy in rural communities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bioenergy crop production and management · Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (INIAV), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal

IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho, 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal

Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, CITAB, Inov4Agro, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, UTAD, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal

CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

Estação Biológica de Mértola (EBM), CIBIO, Praça Luís de Camões, Mértola, 7750-329 Mértola, Portugal

BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Improving biomass estimation in a Populus short rotation coppice plantation10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.020 ↗
2. Oliveira, N., Pérez-Cruzado, C., Cañellas, I., Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., and Sixto, H. (2020). Poplar Short Rotation Coppice Plantations under Mediterranean Conditions: The Case of Spain. Forests, 11.10.3390/f11121352 ↗
3. Short rotation woody coppices for biomass production: An integrated analysis of the potential as an energy alternative
4. Effective woody biomass estimation in poplar short-rotation coppices—Populus nigra × P. maximowiczii10.3832/ifor4200-016 ↗
5. Heavy metals and woody plants—Biotechnologies for phytoremediation10.3832/ifor0555-004 ↗
6. Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203 ↗
7. Biomass production of poplar short rotation coppice over five and six rotations and its aptitude as a fuel10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.011 ↗
8. Short-rotation woody crops and phytoremediation: Opportunities for agroforestry?
9. Padoan, E., Passarella, I., Prati, M., Bergante, S., Facciotto, G., and Ajmone-Marsan, F. (2020). The Suitability of Short Rotation Coppice Crops for Phytoremediation of Urban Soils. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010307 ↗
10. Dimitriou, I., Baum, C., Sarah Baum, S., Busch, G., Schulz, U., Köhn, J., Lamersdorf, N., Leinweber, P., Aronsson, P., and Weih, M. (2025, July 23). Quantifying Environmental Effects of Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) on Biodiversity, Soil and Water. IEA Bioenergy Report: Task 43: 2011:01, 34 pps; IEA Bioenergy Secretariat Website., Available online: www.ieabioenergy.com.
11. SRC willow as a bioremediation medium for a dairy farm effluent with high pollution potential10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.019 ↗
12. Provolo, G., Manuli, G., Finzi, A., Lucchini, G., Riva, E., and Sacchi, G.A. (2018). Effect of Pig and Cattle Slurry Application on Heavy Metal Composition of Maize Grown on Different Soils. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10082684 ↗
13. Fertilizer potential of slurry from intensive dairy cattle farms in intensive production forestry systems10.15406/ijh.2022.06.00300 ↗
14. Impacts of paper sludge and manure on soil and biomass production of willow10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.008 ↗
15. Biomass production and soil nutrients in organic and inorganic fertilized willow biomass production systems10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.002 ↗
16. Seasonal Dynamics of N, P, and K in an Organic and Inorganic Fertilized Willow Biomass System10.1155/2015/471248 ↗
17. The impact of Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) cultivation on the environment
18. N2O emission and the N2O/(N2O+N2) product ratio of denitrification as controlled by available carbon substrates and nitrate concentrations10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.022 ↗
19. Ansari, A., Gill, S., Gill, R., Lanza, G., and Newman, L. (2016). Phytoextraction of Heavy Metals by Fast-Growing Trees: A Review. Phytoremediation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-41811-7 ↗
20. Poplar short rotation coppice is not a first-choice crop for cattle slurry fertilization: Biomass yield and nitrogen-use efficiency10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.042 ↗
21. Paul, E.A. (2007). 13—Nitrogen Transformations. Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry, Academic Press. [3rd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-08-047514-1.50005-6 ↗
22. Matovic, M. (2013). How Soil Nutrient Availability Influences Plant Biomass and How Biomass Stimulation Alleviates Heavy Metal Toxicity in Soils: The Cases of Nutrient Use Efficient Genotypes and Phytoremediators, Respectively. Biomass Now—Cultivation and Utilization, IntechOpen.10.5772/3437 ↗
23. Shmaefsky, B. (2020). Phytoremediation of Agricultural Pollutants. Phytoremediation. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00099-8 ↗
24. Shmaefsky, B. (2020). In Situ Phytoremediation of Metals. Phytoremediation. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00099-8 ↗
25. Shmaefsky, B. (2020). In Situ Phytoremediation of Uranium Contaminated Soils. Phytoremediation. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00099-8 ↗
26. Shmaefsky, B. (2020). Phytoremediation of Explosives. Phytoremediation. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00099-8 ↗
27. Wijekoon, W., Priyashantha, H., Gajanayake, P., Manage, P., Liyanage, C., Jayarathna, S., and Kumarasinghe, U. (2025). Review and Prospects of Phytoremediation: Harnessing Biofuel-Producing Plants for Environmental Remediation. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17030822 ↗
28. Page, A.L., Miler, R.H., and Keeney, D.R. (1982). Total Nitrogen. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological 14 Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Inc.. [2nd ed.].
29. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils: Effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents10.1097/00010694-194704000-00001 ↗
30. O método de Egnér-Riehm na determinação do fósforo e do potássio “assimiláveis” em solos de Portugal
31. It is not worthwhile to fertilize sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) with cattle slurry: Productivity and nitrogen-use efficiency10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.009 ↗
32. Ketterings, Q., Klausner, S., and Czymmek, K. (2003). Nitrogen Guidelines for Field Crops in New York. Second Release, Department of Crop and Soil Extension Series E03-16, Cornell University.
33. Cattle Slurry Fertilization to Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.): Biomass Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency10.1007/s12155-015-9577-2 ↗
34. Biomass and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York State10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00009-5 ↗
35. Field performance of poplar for bioenergy in southern Europe after two coppicing rotations: Effects of clone and planting density10.3832/ifor0628-005 ↗
36. Response of diameter growth, biomass allocation and N uptake to N fertigation in a triploid Populus tomentosa plantation in the North China Plain: Ontogenetic shift does not exclude plasticity10.1007/s10342-015-0897-8 ↗
37. Manual de cultivo de Populus spp. para la producción de biomasa con fines energéticos
38. Dimitriou, R., and Rutz, D. (2015). Sustainable Short Rotation Coppice. A Handbook, WIP Renewable Energies.
39. Nitrogen removal and its determinants in hybrid Populus clones for bioenergy plantations after two biennial rotations in two temperate sites in northern Italy10.3832/ifor1254-007 ↗
40. González, I., Sixto, H., Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., and Oliveira, N. (2020). Nutrient Contribution of Litterfall in a Short Rotation Plantation of Pure or Mixed Plots of Populus alba L. and Robinia pseudoacacia L. Forests, 11.10.3390/f11111133 ↗
41. Nutrient uptake and immobilization in a short-rotation coppice stand of hybrid poplars in north-west France10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00145-0 ↗
42. Carbon and nutrient dynamics in short-rotation coppice of poplar and willow in a converted marginal land, a case study in central France10.1007/s10705-016-9805-y ↗
43. Pérez, P., Barro, R., Pérez, J., Fernández, M.J., Moyano, A., and Ciria, P. (2021). Nutrient Release through Litterfall in Short Rotation Poplar Crops in Mediterranean Marginal Land. Forests, 12.10.3390/f12091185 ↗
44. Effect of waste organic amendments on Populus sp biomass production and thermal characteristics10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.019 ↗
45. Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00564-7 ↗
46. Wastewater and sewage sludge application to willows and poplars grown in lysimeters-Plant response and treatment efficiency10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.019 ↗
47. Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio-energy Populus plantation increases in a future high CO2 world10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01118.x ↗
48. Eight years of continuous carbon fluxes measurements in a Portuguese eucalypt10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.12.007 ↗
49. Nutrient Cycling and Fertility Management in Temperate Short Rotation Forest Systems10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10072-1 ↗
50. Nitrogen and energy balance of a short-rotation poplar forest system
51. Relationship between soil chemical composition and potential fuel quality of biomass from poplar short rotation coppices in Portugal and Belgium10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.021 ↗
52. Use and environmental implications of pulp-mill sludge as an organic fertilizer10.1016/0269-7491(93)90142-B ↗
53. Lee, C.-Y., Kim, C.-H., Park, H.-H., Park, M.-S., Lee, C.-H., and Park, J.-H. (2023). Potential Use of Paper Mill Sludge in Improving Soil Quality for Plant Growth. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158723 ↗
54. Paper sludge utilization in agriculture and container nursery culture10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400060005x ↗
55. Composting of de-inking paper sludge with poultry manure at three nitrogen levels using mechanical turning: Behavior of physico-chemical parameters10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00104-3 ↗
56. Rodrigues, A., Gonçalves, A.B., Casquilho, M., and Gomes, A.A. (2020). A GIS-based evaluation of the potential of woody short rotation coppice (SRC) in Portugal aiming at co-firing and decentralized co-generation. Biomass Bioenergy, 137.10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105554 ↗
57. Sewage sludge and wastewater fertilization of short rotation coppice (SRC) for increased bioenergy production-Biological and economic potential10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.010 ↗
58. Energy performances of intensive and extensive short rotation cropping systems for woody biomass production in the EU10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.058 ↗
59. Effectiveness of mechanical separation for reducing ammonia loss from field-applied slurry: Assessment through literature review and model calculations10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116196 ↗
60. Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, UK Government (2025, November 06). Using a Mechanical Slurry Separator to Manage Your Slurry, Available online: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/using-a-mechanical-slurry-separator-to-manage-your-slurry.
61. Moreira, O., Cruz, V., and Trindade, H. (2022). Roteiro para a Gestão dos Fluxos Gerados na Atividade Agropecuária. Technical Report, Relgráfica Artes Gráficas, Lda. (In Portuguese).
62. Impact of cattle slurry application methods on ammonia losses and grassland nitrogen use efficiency10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120302 ↗
63. Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy from poplar and willow: A review10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01073.x ↗
64. Masson-Delmotte, V.P., Zhai, A., Pirani, S.L., Connors, C., Péan, S., Berger, N., Caud, Y., Chen, L., Goldfarb, M.I., and Gomis, M. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
65. Biodiversity in short-rotation coppice10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.012 ↗
66. Toward an integrative framework for microbial community coalescence10.1016/j.tim.2023.09.001 ↗