Between-Limb Asymmetry Assessment During a Double-Leg Drop Jump Task After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction—A Musculoskeletal Modelling Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Approximately two-thirds of athletes who are submitted to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) never return to their preinjury level of performance, potentially due to muscle strength deficiencies or altered loading patterns during landing or jumping tasks. This study aimed to estimate individual muscle forces during a double-leg drop jump task, and assess sagittal plane between-limb asymmetries in muscle forces and ground reaction forces using a musculoskeletal modelling approach, in athletes who underwent ACLR. Thirty male field-sport athletes (age: 18–35 years; mass: 84.3 ± 12.3 kg; height: 180.2 ± 8.4 cm) post-ACLR (39.8 ± 3.9 weeks) using patellar or quadriceps tendon grafts were tested. Scaled musculoskeletal models were implemented in OpenSim, and muscle forces were estimated using the Computed Muscle Control optimization method. The contralateral limb exhibited greater vertical ground reaction forces across most of the rebound phase (d = 2.01). Compared with the contralateral limb, the ACLR limb showed reduced quadriceps (d = 1.72), soleus (d = 0.95), and gluteus maximus (d = 0.83) forces, indicating deficits in knee extensor, plantarflexor, and hip extensor neuromuscular function. Smaller asymmetries were found for the gluteus medius (d = 0.60) and hamstrings (d = 0.72), while other muscles showed symmetrical activation patterns. These results reveal persistent between-limb asymmetries in muscle recruitment and loading up to nine months post-ACLR, emphasizing the importance of targeted rehabilitation to restore symmetrical neuromuscular control during explosive movements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Sports injuries and prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CIPER, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Cruz Quebrada-Dafundo, 1495-751 Oeiras, Portugal
UPMC Sports Surgery Clinic, Santry Demesne, D09 C523 Dublin, Ireland
Funding
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · CIPER—Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Between-Limb Symmetry in ACL and Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Athletes After ACL Reconstruction and Clearance for Return to Sport10.1177/23259671221084742 ↗
2. Return to Sport Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the State of Play10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364 ↗
3. Return to the Preinjury Level of Competitive Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: Two-Thirds of Patients Have Not Returned by 12 Months after Surgery10.1177/0363546510384798 ↗
4. The Prognosis and Predictors of Sports Function and Activity at Minimum 6 Years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Population Cohort Study10.1177/0363546510383481 ↗
5. Return to Play Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction10.1016/j.csm.2016.05.009 ↗
6. Consensus Criteria for Defining “successful Outcome” after ACL Injury and Reconstruction: A Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Investigation10.1136/bjsports-2013-092299 ↗
7. Abnormal Landing Strategies after ACL Reconstruction10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00873.x ↗
8. Altered Landing Mechanics in ACL-Reconstructed Patients10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182752ae3 ↗
9. Limb Asymmetries in Landing and Jumping 2 Years Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction10.1097/JSM.0b013e31804c77ea ↗
10. Incidence of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury 2 Years after Primary ACL Reconstruction and Return to Sport10.1177/2325967113S00002 ↗
11. Loading Response Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction during the Parallel Squat Exercise10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00063-3 ↗
12. Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction10.1177/0363546515621554 ↗
13. Whole-Body Biomechanical Differences between Limbs Exist 9 Months after ACL Reconstruction across Jump/Landing Tasks10.1111/sms.13259 ↗
14. Lower Extremity Muscle Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.23 ↗
15. Back to Normal Symmetry? Biomechanical Variables Remain More Asymmetrical Than Normal During Jump and Change-of-Direction Testing 9 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction10.1177/0363546519830656 ↗
16. Altered Neuromuscular Activity of the Lower-Extremities during Landing Tasks in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Electromyographic Studies10.1123/jsr.2019-0393 ↗
17. The Effects of Single-Leg Landing Technique on ACL Loading10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.010 ↗
18. Contributions of the Soleus and Gastrocnemius Muscles to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading during Single-Leg Landing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.010 ↗
19. Peel, S.A., Schroeder, L.E., and Weinhandl, J.T. (2021). Lower Extremity Muscle Contributions to ACL Loading during a Stop-Jump Task. J. Biomech., 121.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110426 ↗
20. EMG-Informed Musculoskeletal Modelling to Estimate Realistic Knee Anterior Shear Force during Drop Vertical Jump in Female Athletes10.1007/s10439-019-02318-w ↗
21. Mazumder, O., Chakravarty, K., Chatterjee, D., Sinha, A., and Poduval, M. (2019, January 23–27). Musculoskeletal Modelling to Predict and Reduce Antetrior Cruciate Ligament Injury during Single Leg Drop Jump Activity: Synergistic Muscle Co-Activation Approach. Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856321 ↗
22. Marked Asymmetry in Vertical Force (but Not Contact Times) during Running in ACL Reconstructed Athletes <9 Months Post-Surgery despite Meeting Functional Criteria for Return to Sport10.1016/j.jsams.2018.02.009 ↗
23. The Influence of Muscle-Tendon Forces on ACL Loading during Jump Landing: A Systematic Review10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.125 ↗
24. Comparison of the Performance of 3D Camera Systems II10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01093-4 ↗
25. A Six Degrees-of-Freedom Marker Set for Gait Analysis: Repeatability and Comparison with a Modified Helen Hayes Set10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.004 ↗
26. Biomechanical Factors Associated with Time to Complete a Change of Directions Cutting Maneuver10.1519/JSC.0000000000000463 ↗
27. The Reliability of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Gait Measurements: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003 ↗
28. Bone Position Estimation from Skin Marker Co-Ordinates Using Global Optimisation with Joint Constraints10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00158-4 ↗
29. Dempster, W.T. (1955). Space Requirements of the Seated Operator: Geometrical, Kinematic, and Mechanical Aspects of the Body, with Special Reference to the Limbs, Available online: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/items/a4869201-0cec-41ee-851c-2b0df68db9a3.
30. A Mathematical Model of the Human Body
31. OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 ↗
32. A Dynamic Optimization Solution for Vertical Jumping in Three Dimensions10.1080/10255849908907988 ↗
33. Using Computed Muscle Control to Generate Forward Dynamic Simulations of Human Walking from Experimental Data10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.010 ↗
34. Hicks, J.L., Uchida, T.K., Seth, A., Rajagopal, A., and Delp, S.L. (2015). Is My Model Good Enough? Best Practices for Verification and Validation of Musculoskeletal Models and Simulations of Movement. J. Biomech. Eng., 137.10.1115/1.4029304 ↗
35. Generalized N-Dimensional Biomechanical Field Analysis Using Statistical Parametric Mapping10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.008 ↗
36. Muscle Force Contributions To Ground Reaction Force Profiles During Basketball Related Tasks
37. The Relationship between Quadriceps Strength Asymmetry and Knee Biomechanics Asymmetry during Walking in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.07.151 ↗
38. Bilateral Kinematic and Kinetic Analysis of the Squat Exercise after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00034-0 ↗
39. Kim, H.J., Lee, J.H., Ahn, S.E., Park, M.J., and Lee, D.H. (2016). Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear on Thigh Muscle Strength and Hamstring-to-Quadriceps Ratio: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0146234 ↗
40. How Weakness of the Tensor Fascia Lata and Gluteus Maximus May Contribute to ACL Injury: A New Theory10.1080/09593985.2018.1486492 ↗
41. An Interactive Graphics-Based Model of the Lower Extremity to Study Orthopedic Surgical Procedures10.1109/10.102791 ↗
42. Accuracy of Generic Musculoskeletal Models in Predicting the Functional Roles of Muscles in Human Gait10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.023 ↗