Establishing a Standard Framework for Responding to Hazard Events in Utility Tunnels
Source abstract
Abstract
A utility tunnel is a complex underground facility that serves as a critical infrastructure integrating and operating systems such as electricity, telecommunications, and drainage within a city. However, various hazard events such as fire, flooding, condensation, damage, and intrusion can occur within utility tunnels, posing risks not only to the degradation of facility functions but also to potential human casualties and economic losses. Therefore, it is crucial to establish prompt and effective response measures for these hazard events. Unlike previous studies that focused on individual hazard types, this study proposes an integrated and standardized multihazard response framework for utility tunnels. Through case analysis, fire, flooding, condensation, damage, and intrusion were defined as representative hazard events, and the response stages for each were classified into attention, caution, warning, and critical levels. Appropriate response scenarios were developed for each stage, providing prompt and efficient response measures tailored to different situations. The proposed framework offers a unique contribution by presenting a unified structure that supports stage-based management and can be directly applied to smart monitoring and control systems in underground infrastructure. This study is expected to contribute to improving the disaster prevention and response systems of utility tunnels and enhancing overall facility safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Safety and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea
School of Computer Software, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan-si 38430, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Study on the Fire Risk Prediction Assessment due to Deterioration Contact of Combustible Cables in Underground Common Utility Tunnels10.15683/kosdi.2015.11.1.135 ↗
2. (2019). Fire Protection Standards Report for Underground and Utility Tunnels (Standard No. KFS-1252).
3. Gachon University (2016). Development of Risk Monitoring and Ventilation Control System for Disaster Prevention in Urban Underground Utility Tunnels, Gachon University. Research Report.
4. Establishment of Complex Disaster Scenario on the Utility Tunnel Study for Digital Twin System Application
5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2019). Comprehensive Study for the Activation of Utility Tunnels, Research Report.
6. (2023). Fire Safety Standard for Utility Tunnels (Standard No. NFSC 605).
7. Ministry of Employment and Labor (2024). Occupational Safety and Health Act.
8. (2023). Design Standard for Utility Tunnels (Standard No. KDS 31 25 20).10.7748/ns.20.20.31.s36 ↗
9. Establishing a Risk Assessment Scenario for Fire Prevention and Safety Management in Underground Urban Utility Tunnels
10. Niu, Q., Yuan, Q., Wang, Y., and Hu, Y. (2023). Fire Risk Assessment of Urban Utility Tunnels Based on Improved Cloud Model and Evidence Theory. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042204 ↗
11. Cai, J., Wu, J., Yuan, S., Reniers, G., and Bai, Y. (2024). Risk-Based Optimization of Emergency Response Systems for Accidental Gas Leakage in Utility Tunnels. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 244.10.1016/j.ress.2024.109947 ↗
12. A Study on Disaster Safety Management Methods for Underground Utility Tunnels Based on Digital Twin
13. Air Conditioning System Design to Reduce Condensation in an Underground Utility Tunnel Using CFD10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219210 ↗
14. Measurement of Indoor Environmental Parameters and Analysis of the Condensation Phenomenon in Urban Utility Tunnels10.1177/1420326X211056485 ↗
15. Predicting Internal Environment of Underground Utility Tunnel Using Machine Learning Model
16. On the Computation of Saturation Vapor Pressure10.1175/1520-0450(1967)006<0203:OTCOSV>2.0.CO;2 ↗
17. Xue, G., Liu, S., Ren, L., and Gong, D. (2024). Risk Assessment of Utility Tunnels through Risk Interaction-Based Deep Learning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 241.10.1016/j.ress.2023.109626 ↗