journal article·2025-11-18Open access

Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis Through Supervised Ensemble Method and GenAI-Based Data Augmentation: An Intelligent Diagnostic Tool

Shwetha Rai, Adam Azman Abubakar, Roopashri Shetty, Gururaj Bijur, Nakul K. Shetty, Archana Praveen Kumar

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

Sarcoidosis, one of the rarest diseases, is challenging to diagnose as it mimics the symptoms of other diseases. Machine learning algorithms identify hidden patterns among symptoms, making them suitable for early diagnosis of Sarcoidosis. In this study, four ensemble models are developed using baseline classifiers and applied to a symptom-based secondary dataset to explore the hidden information. The dataset comprises 189 patient records with 14 attributes: 2 serum markers, 10 symptoms, the patient’s gender, and 1 target variable. An exploratory data analysis is carried out using necessary preprocessing techniques, including missing value imputation and data scaling. The features are selected using PCA, and the relevance of the features is analyzed using the Chi-Square Test, Mutual Information, Sequential Feature Selection, and Tree-Based Selection methods. CTGAN, a GenAI technique, is used to augment the dataset, as it contains only 189 records. CTGAN preserves the clinical fidelity of all the features pertaining to the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis, ensuring synthetic data retains meaningful diagnostic patterns. The performance of the models developed is evaluated by applying them to both the original and synthetic data. Results demonstrate that proposed ensemble methods, Model Combinations 1, 3, and 4, showed 99.47% accuracy on the original dataset, whereas Model Combination 1 and Random Forest classifier showed 85.19% and 60.78% accuracies on a combination of the original with 81 synthetic and 1000 synthetic data, respectively. This highlights the combined advantage of CTGAN-based augmentation and ensemble learning in enhancing diagnostic modeling for rare diseases like Sarcoidosis where the datasets are available with limited data points.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Genomics and Rare Diseases

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Carreras-Puigvert, J., and Spjuth, O. (2024). Artificial intelligence for high content imaging in drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 87.10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102842 ↗
2. Important role of translational science in rare disease innovation, discovery, and drug development10.1007/s11606-014-2881-2 ↗
3. Sarcoidosis: A review for the internist
4. Systemic treatment in sarcoidosis: Experience over two decades10.1016/j.ejim.2022.11.020 ↗
5. Sève, P., Pacheco, Y., Durupt, F., Jamilloux, Y., Gerfaud-Valentin, M., Isaac, S., Boussel, L., Calender, A., Androdias, G., and Valeyre, D. (2021). Sarcoidosis: A clinical overview from symptoms to diagnosis. Cells, 10.10.3390/cells10040766 ↗
6. Decherchi, S., Pedrini, E., Mordenti, M., Cavalli, A., and Sangiorgi, L. (2021). Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in rare diseases. Front. Med., 8.10.3389/fmed.2021.747612 ↗
7. Figueira, A., and Vaz, B. (2022). Survey on synthetic data generation, evaluation methods and GANs. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10152733 ↗
8. Livieris, I.E., Alimpertis, N., Domalis, G., and Tsakalidis, D. (2024, January 27–30). An evaluation framework for synthetic data generation models. Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Corfu, Greece.10.1007/978-3-031-63219-8_24 ↗
9. Value of CT spectral imaging in the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis and Hodgkin’s lymphoma based on mediastinal enlarged lymph node: A STARD compliant article10.1097/MD.0000000000031502 ↗
11. Decision tree methods: Applications for classification and prediction
12. Machine learning applications based on SVM classification a review10.48161/qaj.v1n2a50 ↗
13. Guo, G., Wang, H., Bell, D., Bi, Y., and Greer, K. (2003, January 3–7). KNN model-based approach in classification. Proceedings of the On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy. Proceedings.10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_62 ↗
14. A random forest guided tour10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
15. Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126266 ↗
16. A study of disease diagnosis using machine learning
17. Establishing a second-generation artificial intelligence-based system for improving diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with rare diseases10.1038/s41431-021-00928-4 ↗
18. Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer10.7150/thno.77949 ↗
19. Eurelings, L.E., Miedema, J.R., Dalm, V.A., van Daele, P.L., van Hagen, P.M., van Laar, J.A., and Dik, W.A. (2019). Sensitivity and specificity of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor for diagnosing sarcoidosis in a population of patients suspected of sarcoidosis. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0223897 ↗
20. Sánchez Fernández, I., Yang, E., Calvachi, P., Amengual-Gual, M., Wu, J.Y., Krueger, D., Northrup, H., Bebin, M.E., Sahin, M., and Yu, K.H. (2020). Deep learning in rare disease. Detection of tubers in tuberous sclerosis complex. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0232376 ↗
21. Osipov, N., Kudryavtsev, I., Spelnikov, D., Rubinstein, A., Belyaeva, E., Kulpina, A., Kudlay, D., and Starshinova, A. (2024). Differential diagnosis of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis by immunological features using machine learning. Diagnostics, 14.10.3390/diagnostics14192188 ↗
22. Machine learning predicting mortality in sarcoidosis patients admitted for acute heart failure10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.08.001 ↗
23. Evaluation of different classification methods using electronic nose data to diagnose sarcoidosis10.1088/1752-7163/acf1bf ↗
24. Eckstein, J., Moghadasi, N., Körperich, H., Akkuzu, R., Sciacca, V., Sohns, C., Sommer, P., Berg, J., Paluszkiewicz, J., and Burchert, W. (2023). Machine-learning-based diagnostics of cardiac sarcoidosis using multi-chamber wall motion analyses. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13142426 ↗
25. Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Long-Term Survival in Patients With and Without Previously Known Extracardiac Sarcoidosis Using Machine Learning: A Swedish Multicenter Study10.1161/JAHA.123.029481 ↗
26. Attar, H., Solyman, A., Deif, M.A., Hafez, M., Kasem, H.M., and Mohamed, A.E.F. (2023, January 27–28). Machine Learning Model Based on Gary-Level Co-occurrence Matrix for Chest Sarcoidosis Diagnosis. Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Engineering Conference on Electrical, Energy, and Artificial Intelligence (EICEEAI), Zarqa, Jordan.10.1109/EICEEAI60672.2023.10590168 ↗
27. Mushari, N.A., Soultanidis, G., Duff, L., Trivieri, M.G., Fayad, Z.A., Robson, P., and Tsoumpas, C. (2024). An assessment of PET and CMR radiomic features for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis. Front. Nucl. Med., 4.10.3389/fnume.2024.1324698 ↗
28. Eurelings, L.E.M., Miedema, J.R., Dalm, V.A.S.H., van Daele, P.L.A., van Hagen, P.M., van Laar, J.A.M., and Dik, W.A. (2024, October 20). Dataset of Sarcoidosis and Non-Sarcoidosis Patients. Available online: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sensitivity_and_specificity_of_serum_soluble_interleukin-2_receptor_for_diagnosing_sarcoidosis_in_a_population_of_patients_suspected_of_sarcoidosis/9996461?file=18029612.
29. Templ, M. (2023). Enhancing precision in large-scale data analysis: An innovative robust imputation algorithm for managing outliers and missing values. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11122729 ↗
30. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers10.1177/1094428112470848 ↗
31. The chi-square test of independence10.11613/BM.2013.018 ↗
32. A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information10.1007/s00521-013-1368-0 ↗
33. Rückstieß, T., Osendorfer, C., and Van Der Smagt, P. (2011, January 5–8). Sequential feature selection for classification. Proceedings of the AI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 24th Australasian Joint Conference, Perth, Australia. Proceedings 24.
34. Jaiswal, J.K., and Samikannu, R. (2017, January 2–4). Application of random forest algorithm on feature subset selection and classification and regression. Proceedings of the 2017 World Congress on Computing and Communication Technologies (WCCCT), Tiruchirappalli, India.10.1109/WCCCT.2016.25 ↗