Explainable AI Models for Blast-Induced Air Overpressure Prediction Incorporating Meteorological Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate prediction of blast-induced air overpressure (AOp) is vital for environmental management and safety in mining and construction. Traditional empirical models are simple but fail to capture complex meteorological effects, while accurate black-box machine learning models lack interpretability, creating a significant dilemma for practical engineering. This study resolves this by applying explainable AI (XAI) to develop a transparent, “white-box” model that explicitly quantifies how meteorological parameters, wind speed, direction, and air temperature influence AOp. Using a dataset from an urban excavation site, the methodology involved comparing a standard USBM empirical model and a Multivariate Non-linear Regression (MNLR) model against a Symbolic Regression (SR) model implemented with the PySR tool. The SR model demonstrated superior performance on an independent test set, achieving an R2 of 0.771, outperforming both the USBM (R2 = 0.665) and MNLR (R2 = 0.698) models, with accuracy rivaling a previous “black-box” neural network. The key innovation is SR’s ability to autonomously generate an explicit, interpretable equation, revealing complex, non-linear relationships between AOp and meteorological factors. This provides a significant engineering contribution: a trustworthy, transparent tool that enables engineers to perform reliable, meteorologically informed risk assessments for safer blasting operations in sensitive environments like urban areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Landslides and related hazards
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mining Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34500 Istanbul, Türkiye
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Holmberg, R., and Persson, P.A. (1979, January 12–16). Design of tunnel perimeter blasthole patterns to prevent rock damage. Proceedings of the IMM 2nd International Symposium on Tunnelling ’79, London, UK.
2. Siskind, D.E., Stagg, M.S., Kopp, J.W., and Dowding, C.H. (1980). Structure Response and Damage Produced by Ground Vibration from Surface Mine Blasting, U.S. Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations 8507.
3. Loder, B. National Association of Australian State Road Authorities. Proceedings of the Australian Workshop for Senior ASEAN Transport Officials, Canberra, Australia.
4. Olofsson, S.O. (1990). Applied Explosives Technology for Construction and Mining, Applex Publisher.
5. Quarry blast monitoring: Technical and environmental perspectives
6. Persson, P.A., Holmberg, R., and Jaimin, L. (1994). Rock and Explosives Engineering, CRC Press.
7. Prediction of near field overpressure from quarry blasting10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.07.008 ↗
8. Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Feng, H., Cai, C., Zeng, X., and Ou, X. (2022). Propagation characteristics and prediction of airblast overpressure outside tunnel: A case study. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-24917-9 ↗
9. Performance of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network in prediction of ground and air vibrations10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.04.016 ↗
10. Prediction of blast-induced air overpressure using support vector machine10.1007/s12517-009-0092-7 ↗
11. Neuro-fuzzy technique to predict air-overpressure induced by blasting10.1007/s12517-015-1984-3 ↗
12. Several non-linear models in estimating air-overpressure resulting from mine blasting10.1007/s00366-015-0425-y ↗
13. Development of GP and GEP models to estimate an environmental issue induced by blasting operation10.1007/s10661-018-6719-y ↗
14. A comparative study of artificial neural networks in predicting blast-induced air-blast overpressure at Deo Nai open-pit coal mine, Vietnam10.1007/s00521-018-3717-5 ↗
15. A novel artificial intelligent model for predicting air overpressure using brain inspired emotional neural network10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.05.020 ↗
16. Modelling of blasting-induced air overpressure wave propagation under atmospheric conditions by using ANN model10.1007/s12517-020-05763-3 ↗
17. Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.01.005 ↗
18. Prediction of blast-induced air overpressure: A hybrid AI-based predictive model10.1007/s10661-015-4895-6 ↗
19. Prediction of air-overpressure caused by mine blasting using a new hybrid PSO–SVR model10.1007/s00366-016-0453-2 ↗
20. Airblast prediction through a hybrid genetic algorithm–ANN model10.1007/s00521-016-2598-8 ↗
21. Predicting blast-induced air overpressure: A robust artificial intelligence system based on artificial neural networks and random forest10.1007/s11053-018-9424-1 ↗
22. Novel approach for forecasting the blast-induced AOp using a hybrid fuzzy system and firefly algorithm10.1007/s00366-019-00725-0 ↗
23. Estimation of blast-induced air overpressure in quarry mines using Cubist-based genetic algorithm10.1007/s11053-019-09575-5 ↗
24. A new synergetic model of neighbourhood component analysis and artificial intelligence method for blast-induced noise prediction
25. Bhandari, S. (1997). Engineering Rock Blasting Operations, A.A. Balkema.
26. Ratcliff, J., Sheehan, E., and Carte, K. (2011). Predictability of Air Overpressure at Surface Coal Mines in West Virginia.
27. The Effect of Meteorology and Terrain on Noise Propagation—Comparison of Five Modelling Methodologies
28. Predictive modelling of airblast overpressure
29. Evaluating the Effect of Meteorological Conditions on Blast-Induced Air Over-Pressure in Open Pit Coal Mines
30. Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.009 ↗
31. A review on symbolic regression in power systems: Methods, applications, and future directions10.1016/j.rser.2025.116075 ↗
32. Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection10.1007/BF00175355 ↗
33. Gene expression programming: A new adaptive algorithm for solving problems
34. Genetic algorithms in stability analysis of non-homogeneous slopes10.3328/IJGE.2011.05.01.33-44 ↗
35. A novel model for prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rocks10.5802/crmeca.109 ↗
36. Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Zhou, S., and Liu, S. (2021). Modeling of tunneling total loads based on symbolic regression algorithm. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11125671 ↗
37. Mine Subsidence Prediction Using Gene Expression Programming Based on Multivariable Symbolic Regression
38. Estimating maximum surface settlement due to EPBM tunneling by Numerical-Intelligent approach—A case study: Tehran subway line 710.1016/j.trgeo.2018.11.009 ↗
39. Symbolic regression based prediction of anisotropic closure in deep tunnels10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106355 ↗
40. Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: A new model for peak particle velocity prediction10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2 ↗
41. Modification and prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations based on both empirical and computational techniques10.1007/s00366-016-0448-z ↗
42. Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using gene expression programming (GEP), artificial neural networks (ANNs) and linear multivariate regression (LMR)
43. Prediction of blast induced air overpressure using a hybrid machine learning model and gene expression programming (GEP): A case study from an iron mine10.3934/geosci.2023019 ↗
44. Ozer, U., Karadogan, A., and Ozyurt, M.C. (2016). Evaluation of vibration and air overpressure measurements caused by blasting in basic excavation work in the construction of office and trade center, Istanbul Province, Maltepe District, 2588 block, 25-27-29-31-53 parcel, 2543 block, 10-18-36-37-39 parcel and 496 block and 3 parcel; Project Report, Project Number: 235094 Istanbul Univ-Cerrahpasa Eng Fac Revolving Fund, (In Turkish).
45. A survey on feature selection methods10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 ↗
46. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
47. Cranmer, M. (2023). Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl. arXiv.
48. Advanced machine learning techniques for building performance simulation: A comparative analysis10.1080/19401493.2018.1498538 ↗