Bridging the Gap in Cancer Survival Analysis: Deep Neural Networks for Left-Truncated Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Deep learning has demonstrated better performance than traditional regression methods in handling right-censored cancer survival data; however, its application in survival analysis remains limited due to censoring-related data loss and the lack of approaches addressing left-censored or left-truncated cases. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel deep neural network algorithm designed to incorporate left truncation in survival analysis. Building upon prior research, we propose an innovative approach that integrates deep learning with survival analysis by applying complementary and consensus statistical principles to simultaneously account for left truncation and right censoring. The cumulative hazard function was estimated using the Breslow estimator and incorporated as an output variable in the proposed model. Model performance was assessed using the integrated area under the curve (iAUC), which quantifies predictive accuracy across all time points. The proposed method demonstrated robust predictive performance with an iAUC of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.705–0.785) when applied to left-truncated and right-censored survival data. Its performance was comparable to widely recognized statistical and machine learning techniques for survival analysis, including the Cox proportional hazards model (iAUC = 0.779, 95% CI: 0.739–0.812) and random survival forests (iAUC = 0.829, 95% CI: 0.795–0.858). This study introduces a methodological extension of deep neural network models, previously restricted to right-censored survival data, to also accommodate left-truncated survival data. The validation results provide evidence that the proposed model achieves predictive performance comparable to well-established methods, thereby broadening the applicability of deep learning in survival analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Statistical Methods and Inference · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Medical Information, Kongju National University, 56 Gongjudaehak-ro, Gongju-si 32588, Republic of Korea
Funding
Kongju National University
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Conditions for bias from differential left truncation10.1093/aje/kwk027 ↗
2. Left truncation, susceptibility, and bias in occupational cohort studies10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821d0879 ↗
3. Left truncation bias as a potential explanation for the protective effect of smoking on preeclampsia10.1097/EDE.0000000000000268 ↗
4. Chen, J.G., Chen, H.Z., Zhu, J., Shen, A.G., Sun, X.Y., and Parkin, D.M. (2023). Cancer survival: Left truncation and comparison of results from hospital-based cancer registry and population-based cancer registry. Front. Oncol., 13.10.3389/fonc.2023.1173828 ↗
5. Penalized regression for left-truncated and right-censored survival data10.1002/sim.9136 ↗
6. The impact of left truncation of exposure in environmental case-control studies: Evidence from breast cancer risk associated with airborne dioxin10.1007/s10654-021-00776-y ↗
7. A primer on neural network models for natural language processing10.1613/jair.4992 ↗
8. Graves, A., Mohamed, A., and Hinton, G. (2013, January 26–31). Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947 ↗
9. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
10. Combining deep learning and survival analysis for asset health management
11. Ranganath, R., Perotte, A., Elhadad, N., and Blei, D. (2016). Deep survival analysis. arXiv.
12. A neural network model for survival data10.1002/sim.4780140108 ↗
13. Katzman, J.L., Shaham, U., Cloninger, A., Bates, J., Jiang, T., and Kluger, Y. (2018). DeepSurv: Personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 18.10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1 ↗
14. Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks10.1073/pnas.1717139115 ↗
15. Li, H., Boimel, P., Janopaul-Naylor, J., Xiao, Y., Ben-Josef, E., and Fan, Y. (2019, January 8–11). Deep convolutional neural networks for imaging data based survival analysis of rectal cancer. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759301 ↗
16. Miscouridou, X., Perotte, A., Elhadad, N., and Ranganath, R. (2018, January 17–18). Deep survival analysis: Nonparametrics and missingness. Proceedings of the Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
17. A scalable discrete-time survival model for neural networks10.7717/peerj.6257 ↗
18. Klein, J.P., and Moeschberger, M.L. (2003). Semiparametric Proportional Hazards Regression with Fixed Covariates. Survival Analysis. Statistics for Biology and Health, Springer.10.1007/0-387-21645-6_8 ↗
19. Survival trees for left-truncated and right-censored data, with application to time-varying covariate data
20. Cox. Regression models and life-tables10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x ↗
21. Random survival forests10.1214/08-AOAS169 ↗
22. Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U.B., and Kogalur, M.U.B. (2025, August 14). Package ‘randomForestSRC’. Available online: https://kogalur.r-universe.dev/builds.
23. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting
24. Relative Risk Trees for Censored Survival Data10.2307/2532300 ↗
25. Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., Mayr, A., and Hochreiter, S. (2017, January 4–9). Self-normalizing neural networks. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
26. Time dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00337.x ↗
27. Incorporating the time dimension in receiver operating characteristic curves: A case study of prostate cancer10.1177/0272989X9901900303 ↗
28. Statistical models for longitudinal biomarkers of disease onset10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<617::AID-SIM360>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
29. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data10.1002/sim.4154 ↗
30. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models10.1002/sim.2059 ↗
31. Comparing the Survival of Two Groups with an Intermediate Clinical Event10.1023/A:1009609925212 ↗
32. Lee, C., Zame, W.R., Yoon, J., and van der Schaar, M. (2018, January 2–7). Deephit: A deep learning approach to survival analysis with competing risks. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11842 ↗
33. Evaluating the yield of medical tests10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030 ↗
34. Jaderberg, M.E., Czarnecki, W., Green, T.O.F.G., and Dalibard, V.C. (2023). Population Based Training of Neural Networks. (11,604,985), U.S. Patent.
35. Falkner, S., Klein, A., and Hutter, F. (2018, January 10–15). BOHB: Robust and efficient hyperparameter optimization at scale. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden.
36. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
37. Consistent estimation of the expected Brier score in general survival models with right-censored event times10.1002/bimj.200610301 ↗
38. Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves10.18637/jss.v050.i11 ↗
39. Deep learning models for the analysis of high-dimensional survival data with time-varying covariates while handling missing data10.1007/s44163-025-00429-z ↗
40. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions