journal article·2025-11-13Open access

Characterization of Upper Extremity Joint Angle Error for Virtual Reality Motion Capture Compared to Infrared Motion Capture

Skyler A. Barclay, Trent Brown, Tessa M. Hill, Ann Smith, Timothy Reissman, Allison L. Kinney, Megan E. Reissman

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) offers built-in wearable sensor-based tracking capabilities. Current research focusses on position and orientation error, with limited results on more clinically relevant metrics, such as joint angles. This leads us to our first objective, to characterize the accuracy of upper extremity VR motion capture. Since the intent is for clinical translation, our second objective is to compare the errors across people identified as healthy controls and people who had experienced a spinal cord injury (SCI). Spatially and temporally synced VR and infrared motion capture data were collected during a variety of custom VR Beat Saber levels. Error values were found with infrared motion capture as the ground truth. The median RMSE was found to be below 7° for shoulder horizontal adduction and elbow flexion and 5° for shoulder elevation and wrist joint metrics. The percentage median error for the range of motion was found to be below 30%, 15%, and 5% for the frontal wrist, sagittal wrist, and all other joints, respectively. Larger standard deviations suggest that repetitions are needed to obtain reliable measurements. No statistical difference in any error metric was found between the control cohort and SCI cohort, providing evidence for clinical translation for post-SCI treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Muscle activation and electromyography studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Empower Lab., University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA

Gait & Motion Analysis Lab., Dayton Children’s Hospital, Miamisburg, OH 45342, USA

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation · Ohio Department of Higher Education

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Merker, S., Pastel, S., Bürger, D., Schwadtke, A., and Witte, K. (2023). Measurement Accuracy of the HTC VIVE Tracker 3.0 Compared to Vicon System for Generating Valid Positional Feedback in Virtual Reality. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23177371 ↗
2. Joyner, J., and Kontson, K. (2024, January 15–19). Movement Tracking Accuracy of HTC Vive VR System during Upper Body Discrete Motion Tasks. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782535 ↗
3. Technical Evaluation of the Fidelity of the HTC Vive for Upper Limb Tracking
4. Robustness and Static-Positional Accuracy of the SteamVR 1.0 Virtual Reality Tracking System10.1007/s10055-021-00584-5 ↗
5. Kulozik, J., and Jarrassé, N. (2024). Evaluating the Precision of the HTC VIVE Ultimate Tracker with Robotic and Human Movements under Varied Environmental Conditions. arXiv.
6. Effects of a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury10.1177/15459683211017504 ↗
7. A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Gait Recognition: Algorithms, Datasets and Challenges10.1109/TBIOM.2024.3486345 ↗
8. Hansen, R.M., Arena, S.L., and Queen, R.M. (2024). Validation of Upper Extremity Kinematics Using Markerless Motion Capture. Biomed. Eng. Adv., 7.10.1016/j.bea.2024.100128 ↗
9. Wireless Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Methods for Measuring Lumbopelvic-Hip Range of Motion Are Valid Compared with Optical Motion Capture as Golden Standard10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.04.003 ↗
10. Feasibility of Using a Fully Immersive Virtual Reality System for Kinematic Data Collection10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.02.015 ↗
11. Bauer, P., Lienhart, W., and Jost, S. (2021). Accuracy Investigation of the Pose Determination of a VR System. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051622 ↗
12. Kuhlmann de Canaviri, L., Meiszl, K., Hussein, V., Abbassi, P., Mirraziroudsari, S.D., Hake, L., Potthast, T., Ratert, F., Schulten, T., and Silberbach, M. (2023). Static and Dynamic Accuracy and Occlusion Robustness of SteamVR Tracking 2.0 in Multi-Base Station Setups. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23020725 ↗
13. Vox, J.P., Weber, A., Wolf, K.I., Izdebski, K., Schüler, T., König, P., Wallhoff, F., and Friemert, D. (2021). An Evaluation of Motion Trackers with Virtual Reality Sensor Technology in Comparison to a Marker-Based Motion Capture System Based on Joint Angles for Ergonomic Risk Assessment. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21093145 ↗
14. van der Veen, S.M., and Thomas, J.S. (2021). A Pilot Study Quantifying Center of Mass Trajectory during Dynamic Balance Tasks Using an HTC Vive Tracker Fixed to the Pelvis. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21238034 ↗
15. A Motion-Decomposition Approach to Address Gimbal Lock in the 3-Cylinder Open Chain Mechanism Description of a Joint Coordinate System at the Glenohumeral Joint10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.034 ↗
16. Measurement of Upper Limb Range of Motion Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review10.1186/s40798-018-0167-7 ↗
17. Enabling Precision Rehabilitation Interventions Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning to Track Motor Recovery10.1038/s41746-020-00328-w ↗
18. (2025, September 20). Vicon Upper Body Modeling with Plug-in Gait. Available online: https://help.vicon.com/space/Nexus216/11602259/Upper+body+modeling+with+Plug-in+Gait.
19. Berkeley Open Extended Reality Recordings 2023 (BOXRR-23): 4.7 Million Motion Capture Recordings from 105,000 XR Users10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372087 ↗