Knowledge-Based Approach for Contextual Landsystem Identification: A Conceptual Model and Graph-Based Software, with an Application to Mountain Glacial Valleys
Source abstract
Abstract
A landform is a physical feature of the Earth’s surface with its own recognizable shape. Most current automated landform identification methods use Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) techniques. Such methods segment the terrain into landform elements and assemble them into topographic objects and landforms. Usually, these methods are specific to the landform to be identified. However, geomorphologist experts can contextually recognize any landform on the Earth’s surface in relation to its environment. They have a holistic view of the landscape, adopting a physiographic approach for the interpretation of the observed regions, the objects that they contain and their relationships. Moreover, geomorphological processes leave marks on the Earth’s surface that enable geomorphologists to identify homogeneous regions by recognizing features known as structural elements. In this paper, we show that the physiographic approach can be formalized and that the context of appearance of a landform and its association with other types of landforms can be represented as a landsystem. We propose a conceptual model that organizes the main concepts and relationships characterizing the physiographic approach: they are used to formalize landsystems, landforms and structural elements. The approach is illustrated using a case study of the identification of landsystems characteristic of mountainous glacial valleys. We developed a software to automatically identify landsystems, in a way that is compatible with the geomorphologists’ physiographic approach. The core of this system is a knowledge base implemented as a Neo4j graph database. We also provide details about the logical transformation of the conceptual model and the corresponding ontologies in Noe4j structures. The tool automates the identification of landsystems in accordance with geomorphological practices, facilitating the integration of expert knowledge in the computational workflows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geographic Information Systems Studies · Geological Modeling and Analysis · Graph Theory and Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Département des Sciences Géomatiques, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Département d’Informatique et de Génie Logiciel, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Département de Géographie, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Schoeneberger, P.J., and Wysocki, D.A. (2017). Geomorphic Description System, Version 5.0.
2. Geomorphometry and Landform Mapping: What Is a Landform?10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.029 ↗
3. Chapter 1 Geomorphometry: A Brief Guide10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00001-9 ↗
4. Cassol, W.N., Daniel, S., and Guilbert, É. (2021). A Segmentation Approach to Identify Underwater Dunes from Digital Bathymetric Models. Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11090361 ↗
5. Di Stefano, M., and Mayer, L. (2018). An Automatic Procedure for the Quantitative Characterization of Submarine Bedforms. Geosciences, 8.10.3390/geosciences8010028 ↗
6. d’Oleire-Oltmanns, S., Eisank, C., Drǎguţ, L., Schrott, L., Marzolff, I., and Blaschke, T. (2012, January 7–9). Object-Based Landform Mapping at Multiple Scales from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and Aerial Photographs. Proceedings of the 4th GEOBIA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
7. A Generic Procedure for Semantics-Oriented Landform Classification Using Object-Based Image Analysis
8. Chapter 9 Landforms and Landform Elements in Geomorphometry10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00009-3 ↗
9. Deep Learning-Based Approach for Landform Classification from Integrated Data Sources of Digital Elevation Model and Imagery10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107045 ↗
10. Berral, J.L., Gavalda, R., and Torres, J. (2013, January 1–4). Power-Aware Multi-Data Center Management Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2013 42nd International Conference on Parallel Processing, Lyon, France.10.1109/ICPP.2013.102 ↗
11. GeoNat v1.0: A Dataset for Natural Feature Mapping with Artificial Intelligence and Supervised Learning10.1111/tgis.12633 ↗
12. Ontologies to Interpret Remote Sensing Images: Why Do We Need Them?10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890 ↗
13. Computation and Elicitation of Valleyness10.1080/13875868.2010.537797 ↗
14. Les structures naturelles de l’espace géographique. L’exemple des Montagnes Cantabriques centrales (nord-ouest de l’Espagne)10.3406/rgpso.1972.3328 ↗
15. Cooke, R.U., Doornkamp, J.C., and Doornkamp, J.C. (1990). Geomorphology in Environmental Management: A New Introduction, Clarendon Press. [2nd ed.].
16. Landform Classification for Land Use Planning in Developed Areas: An Example in Segovia Province (Central Spain)10.1007/s00267-003-2848-2 ↗
17. Sochava, V.B. (1978). Introduction to the Theory of Geosystems, Science.
18. Mateo, J.M. (2019). The Legacy of Sochava: The Theory of Geosystems, Federal University of Ceará.
19. Kokla, M., and Guilbert, E. (2020). A Review of Geospatial Semantic Information Modeling and Elicitation Approaches. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9030146 ↗
20. The Dark Art of Interpretation in Geomorphology10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107870 ↗
21. Understanding the Earth as a Complex System—Recent Advances in Data Analysis and Modelling in Earth Sciences10.1140/epjst/e2009-01086-6 ↗
22. Dikau, R. (1999). The Need for Field Evidence in Modelling Landform Evolution, Springer.
23. Defining a Hierarchy of Spatial Entities for Environmental Analysis and Modeling Using Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00019-X ↗
24. Old and New Trends in Geomorphological and Landform Mapping10.1016/B978-0-444-53446-0.00002-1 ↗
25. Huggett, R.J. (2011). Fundamentals of Geomorphology, Routledge. [3rd ed.].10.4324/9780203860083 ↗
26. An Introduction to UML Profiles
27. Guia, J., Gonçalves Soares, V., and Bernardino, J. (2017, January 26–29). Graph Databases: Neo4j Analysis. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Porto, Portugal.10.5220/0006356003510356 ↗
28. R-Trees: A Dynamic Index Structure for Spatial Searching10.1145/971697.602266 ↗
29. Banos, A., Lang, C., and Marilleau, N. (2015). 2-Description Formalisms in Agent Models. Agent-Based Spatial Simulation with Netlogo, Elsevier.
30. (2025, October 30). Coastlines. Available online: https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/data/coastlines.html.
31. Sayre, R. (2025, October 30). Global Mountains K3, Available online: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/638fbf72d34ed907bf7d3080.
32. (2025, February 01). Last Glacial Maximum. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=046cde34ce804141a8d5303656e74f44.
33. (2025, October 30). USGS National Hydrography Dataset Best Resolution (NHD), Available online: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/61f8b882d34e622189c32886.
34. Assessment of In-Stream Phosphorus Dynamics in Agricultural Drainage Ditches10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.038 ↗
35. The Extraction of Drainage Networks from Digital Elevation Data10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0 ↗
36. An automated bottom up hydrologic coding system for dendritic river system10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W16-169-2019 ↗