Green AI for Energy-Efficient Ground Investigation: A Greedy Algorithm-Optimized AI Model for Subsurface Data Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Current ground investigation practice in geotechnical engineering is highly energy- and time-intensive, which is environmentally unfriendly. Several weeks are usually required to perform the investigation, and along this process, acquiring just one parameter of a soil sample may consume more than 100 Wh. Addressing this challenge, this study aimed at reducing energy consumption of ground investigation following Green AI concept, and an AI model for subsurface data prediction, which was optimized with greedy algorithm, was therefore developed. This model inputs soil parameters obtained by low-energy methods and outputs soil parameters (i.e., shear strength parameters) obtained by high-energy methods in traditional ground investigation practice. The model was established using ensemble learning techniques and a large dataset with fifteen types of parameters, which was obtained from 924 samples via a series of laboratory tests in a traditional ground investigation. Meanwhile, considering the variability on ensemble model architecture, greedy algorithm was adopted to optimize the architecture from a pool of nine base learners and six ensemble strategies. Thereby, the best-performing AI model was eventually identified, and it achieved a R2 value of 0.881 over the testing dataset, which accounts for 30% of the overall parameter dataset. With this model, the energy consumption needed to acquire the subsurface data was significantly reduced by 71%. The findings of this study pave the way for a lower-carbon but more intelligent ground investigation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques · Soil and Unsaturated Flow
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510080, China
School of Intelligent Civil and Ocean Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
Funding
Research Funding of Guangzhou Metro Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd. · Shenzhen Science and Technology Program · China State Railway Group Co., Ltd.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Das, B.M., and Sivakugan, N. (2017). Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, Cengage Learning.
2. Ng, C.W., Liu, J., and Chen, R. (2015). Numerical investigation on gas emission from three landfill soil covers under dry weather conditions. Vadose Zone J., 14.10.2136/vzj2014.12.0180 ↗
3. Liu, L.-L., Xu, Y.-B., Zhu, W.-Q., and Zhang, J. (2024). Effect of copula dependence structure on the failure modes of slopes in spatially variable soils. Comput. Geotech., 166.10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105959 ↗
4. Shi, X., Liu, K., and Yin, J. (2021). Effect of initial density, particle shape, and confining stress on the critical state behavior of weathered gap-graded granular soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 147.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002449 ↗
5. Experiments and simulations of direct shear tests: Porosity, contact friction and bulk friction10.1007/s10035-008-0085-3 ↗
6. Tai, P., Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Chen, R., and Li, Z. (2024). Cyclic behaviour of stone column reinforced subgrade under partially drained condition. Transp. Geotech., 47.10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101281 ↗
7. Chen, R., Luo, Z., Zhang, L., Li, Z., and Tan, R. (2025). A new flexible-wall triaxial permeameter for localized characterizations of soil suffusion. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 58.10.1144/qjegh2023-124 ↗
8. Preparing test specimens using undercompaction10.1520/GTJ10364J ↗
9. Physical and numerical modeling of an inclined three-layer (silt/gravelly sand/clay) capillary barrier cover system under extreme rainfall10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.013 ↗
10. Estimation of compression behavior of granular soils considering initial density effect based on equivalent concept10.1007/s11440-024-02429-2 ↗
11. Impact of wetting–drying cycles on hydro-mechanical behavior of an unsaturated compacted clay10.1016/j.clay.2013.09.018 ↗
12. Zhang, J., Liu, W., Yu, Q., Zhu, Q.-Z., and Shao, J.-F. (2025). A micromechanical model for induced anisotropic damage-friction in rock materials under cyclic loading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 186.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.106014 ↗
13. Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, R., Tai, P., and Zhang, Z. (2025). Numerical investigation of morphological effects on crushing characteristics of single calcareous sand particle by finite-discrete element method. Powder Technol., 453.10.1016/j.powtec.2024.120592 ↗
14. Shi, X., and Zhao, J. (2020). Practical estimation of compression behavior of clayey/silty sands using equivalent void-ratio concept. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 146.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002267 ↗
15. Zhang, J., Liu, W., Zhu, Q., and Shao, J.-F. (2023). A novel elastic–plastic damage model for rock materials considering micro-structural degradation due to cyclic fatigue. Int. J. Plast., 160.10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103496 ↗
16. Relationship between electrical conductivity anisotropy and fabric anisotropy in granular materials during drained triaxial compressive tests: A numerical approach10.1093/gji/ggx140 ↗
17. Determination of undrained strength of fine-grained soils by means of SPT and its application in Turkey10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.05.002 ↗
18. Jamiolkowski, M., Lo Presti, D., and Manassero, M. (2003). Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from CPT and DMT. Soil Behavior and Soft Ground Construction, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/40659(2003)7 ↗
19. Shi, X., Xu, J., Guo, N., Bian, X., and Zeng, Y. (2025). A novel approach for describing gradation curves of rockfill materials based on the mixture concept. Comput. Geotech., 177.10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106911 ↗
20. Pore-based modeling of hydraulic conductivity function of unsaturated rooted soils10.1002/nag.3958 ↗
21. Pentoś, K., Mbah, J.T., Pieczarka, K., Niedbała, G., and Wojciechowski, T. (2022). Evaluation of multiple linear regression and machine learning approaches to predict soil compaction and shear stress based on electrical parameters. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178791 ↗
22. Prediction of geotechnical parameters using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.066 ↗
23. Tziachris, P., Aschonitis, V., Chatzistathis, T., Papadopoulou, M., and Doukas, I.D. (2020). Comparing machine learning models and hybrid geostatistical methods using environmental and soil covariates for soil pH prediction. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9040276 ↗
24. Li, J., Sun, J., Zhang, Z., and Li, Z. (2025). Comparative investigation of torsional interactive behaviours between suction anchors and clayey ground by centrifugal tests. Ocean Eng., 341.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122676 ↗
25. Li, K.-Q., Liu, Y., and Kang, Q. (2022). Estimating the thermal conductivity of soils using six machine learning algorithms. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 136.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106139 ↗
26. Estimation of soil temperature from meteorological data using different machine learning models10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.044 ↗
27. Using machine learning for prediction of saturated hydraulic conductivity and its sensitivity to soil structural perturbations10.1029/2018WR024357 ↗
28. Machine learning modelling for predicting soil liquefaction susceptibility10.5194/nhess-11-1-2011 ↗
29. Achieng, K.O. (2019). Modelling of soil moisture retention curve using machine learning techniques: Artificial and deep neural networks vs support vector regression models. Comput. Geosci., 133.10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104320 ↗
30. Machine learning-based modelling of soil properties for geotechnical design: Review, tool development and comparison10.1007/s11831-021-09615-5 ↗
31. Li, Z., Qi, Z., Ling, J., Liu, Y., Guo, H., and Xu, T. (2026). A pragmatic modelling framework for long-term deformation analyses of urban tunnel under multi-source cyclic loads. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 167.10.1016/j.tust.2025.107029 ↗
32. Prediction of residual friction angle of clays using artificial neural network10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.001 ↗
33. Pham, B.T., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Ly, H.-B., Nguyen, M.D., Al-Ansari, N., Tran, V.-Q., and Le, T.-T. (2020). Extreme learning machine based prediction of soil shear strength: A sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations and feature backward elimination. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062339 ↗
34. Prediction of shear strength of soft soil using machine learning methods10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.004 ↗
35. Zhu, L., Liao, Q., Wang, Z., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Bian, Q., and Zhang, Q. (2022). Prediction of soil shear Strength parameters using combined data and different machine learning models. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12105100 ↗
36. Verdecchia, R., Sallou, J., and Cruz, L. (2023). A systematic review of Green AI. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 13.10.1002/widm.1507 ↗
37. Li, Y., Rahardjo, H., Satyanaga, A., Rangarajan, S., and Lee, D.T.-T. (2022). Soil database development with the application of machine learning methods in soil properties prediction. Eng. Geol., 306.10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106769 ↗
38. Characterization of particle orientation of kaolinite samples using the deep learning-based technique10.1007/s11440-021-01266-x ↗
39. Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G.B., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M.N., Geng, X., and Bauer-Marschallinger, B. (2017). SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 ↗
40. Zhang, X., Li, Z., Sui, Y., Liu, C., and Li, Z. (2024). Hybrid soil strength prediction model for geotechnical ground investigation using convolutional neural network and ensemble learning. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2816.10.1088/1742-6596/2816/1/012066 ↗
41. An advanced meta-learner based on artificial electric field algorithm optimized stacking ensemble techniques for enhancing prediction accuracy of soil shear strength10.1007/s00366-020-01116-6 ↗
42. Liu, L.-L., Yin, H.-D., Xiao, T., Huang, L., and Cheng, Y.-M. (2024). Dynamic prediction of landslide life expectancy using ensemble system incorporating classical prediction models and machine learning. Geosci. Front., 15.10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101758 ↗
43. Comparative performance of eight ensemble learning approaches for the development of models of slope stability prediction10.1007/s11440-021-01440-1 ↗
44. Regional 3D geological modeling along metro lines based on stacking ensemble model10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.002 ↗
45. Implementing ensemble learning models for the prediction of shear strength of soil10.1007/s42107-023-00629-x ↗
46. Green AI10.1145/3381831 ↗
47. Zhang, X., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Sui, Y., Liu, C., Xue, Z., and Li, Z. (2023). Comparative Investigation of Axial Bearing Performance and Mechanism of Continuous Flight Auger Pile in Weathered Granitic Soils. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13112707 ↗
48. Bian, X., Gao, Z., Zhao, P., and Li, X. (2024). Quantitative analysis of low carbon effect of urban underground space in Xinjiekou district of Nanjing city, China. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 143.10.1016/j.tust.2023.105502 ↗
49. Shi, X., Nie, J., Zhao, J., and Gao, Y. (2020). A homogenization equation for the small strain stiffness of gap-graded granular materials. Comput. Geotech., 121.10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103440 ↗
50. Comparison of Min-Max normalization and Z-Score Normalization in the K-nearest neighbor (kNN) Algorithm to Test the Accuracy of Types of Breast Cancer
51. Bian, X., Ren, Z., Zeng, L., Zhao, F., Yao, Y., and Li, X. (2024). Effects of biochar on the compressibility of soil with high water content. J. Clean. Prod., 434.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140032 ↗
52. A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble machine learning in geotechnical stability analysis and explainability10.1007/s10999-023-09679-0 ↗
53. Susan, S., Kumar, A., and Jain, A. (2020, January 28–29). Evaluating heterogeneous ensembles with boosting meta-learner. Proceedings of the Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies: Proceedings of ICICCT 2020, Namakkal, India.10.1007/978-981-15-7345-3_60 ↗
54. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (2025, August 11). Announcement on the Release of 2023 Power Carbon Footprint Factor Data, Available online: https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202501/t20250123_1101226.html.