journal article·2025-11-09Open access

Mechanisms and Mitigation of Injection-Induced Microseismicity: The Critical Role of Fracture Orientation in Shear Reactivation

Yilong Yuan, Wei Wang, Jiawei Tang, Zixu Hu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

Hot dry rock (HDR) is a promising renewable energy resource whose vast reserves and wide distribution have attracted extensive attention in recent years. However, exploiting HDR resources requires hydraulic stimulation, which is typically accompanied by substantial microseismic activity, posing significant risks to project safety and public acceptance. Current understanding of microseismic mechanisms, particularly the role of fracture geometry under varying injection schemes, remains inadequate. This study employs a three-dimensional block-based discrete element method to construct a fluid–mechanics coupled model founded on a discrete fracture network, aimed at investigating the mechanical behavior of fractures and the spatial distribution of microseismicity during hydraulic stimulation. Our results quantitatively demonstrate that fractures oriented at 45° to the maximum principal stress are most susceptible to shear reactivation and microseismic clustering, with event magnitudes strongly correlated to both fracture orientation and intra-fracture fluid pressure. Consequently, preventing critically high fluid pressures in natural fractures near the injection well, particularly those at approximately 45° to the maximum principal stress direction, is essential for risk mitigation. Cyclic injection can shear more fractures and slightly reduce magnitudes via staged pressure relaxation, but its effectiveness in controlling microseismic magnitude is limited. Therefore, it is recommended to implement measures to control the entry of fracturing fluid into these high-risk fissures, such as segmented fracturing or temporary plugging techniques. This strategy is expected to enhance seismic risk mitigation, thereby contributing to the safe and efficient exploitation of deep geothermal resources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications · Groundwater flow and contamination studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 102209, China

Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China

Sichuan Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, 610072, China

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132000, China

Funding

Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Scientific Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Observations of hydraulic stimulations in seven enhanced geothermal system projects10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.044 ↗
2. Hot dry rock (HDR) hydraulic fracturing propagation and impact factors assessment via sensitivity indicator10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.097 ↗
3. An experimental investigation into the characteristics of hydraulic fracturing and fracture permeability after hydraulic fracturing in granite10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.096 ↗
4. Investigation on fracture creation in hot dry rock geothermal formations of China during hydraulic fracturing10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.128 ↗
5. Opportunity and challenges in large-scale geothermal energy exploitation in China10.1080/10643389.2021.1971004 ↗
6. A qualitative prediction method of new crack-initiation direction during hydraulic fracturing of pre-cracks based on hyperbolic failure envelope10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.151 ↗
7. Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.172 ↗
8. Moska, R., Labus, K., and Kasza, P. (2021). Hydraulic Fracturing in Enhanced Geothermal Systems—Field, Tectonic and Rock Mechanics Conditions—A Review. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14185725 ↗
9. The Propagation Behavior of Hydraulic Fracture in Rock Mass with Cemented Joints
10. Li, N., Xie, H., Gao, Z., and Li, C. (2022). Study on the Hydraulic Fracturing Failure Behaviour of Granite and Its Comparison with Gas Fracturing. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142114593 ↗
11. Stimulation mechanism and design of enhanced geothermal systems: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.rser.2021.111914 ↗
12. Calculation of hydraulic fracture induced stress and corresponding fault slippage in shale formation10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.108 ↗
13. An investigation of stimulation mechanisms in Enhanced Geothermal Systems10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.011 ↗
14. Analysis of induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs—An overview10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.06.005 ↗
15. Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.06.002 ↗
16. Investigation of Fault Mechanisms during Geothermal Reservoir Stimulation Experiments in the Cooper Basin, Australia10.1785/0120080055 ↗
17. A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forets10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.10.001 ↗
18. Injection tests at the EGS reservoir of Soultz-sous-Forets. Seismic response of the GPK4 stimulations10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.10.007 ↗
19. The stress field at Soultz-sous-Forets from focal mechanisms of induced seismic events: Cases of the wells GPK2 and GPK310.1016/j.crte.2009.12.003 ↗
20. Triggering of the Pohang, Korea, Earthquake (Mw 5.5) by Enhanced Geothermal System Stimulation
21. Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event10.1126/science.aat6081 ↗
22. Runaway Versus Stable Fracturing During Hydraulic Stimulation: Insights from the Damage Rheology Modeling10.1007/s00603-021-02395-1 ↗
23. Numerical Simulation of An In-situ Fluid Injection Experiment into a Fault Using Coupled X-FEM Analysis10.1007/s00603-020-02301-1 ↗
24. A Seismic Moment Magnitude Scale10.1785/0120180338 ↗
25. Reservoir stimulation and induced seismicity: Roles of fluid pressure and thermal transients on reactivated fractured networks10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.014 ↗
26. Yaghoubi, A., Dusseault, M.B., and Leonenko, Y. (2022). Injection-induced fault slip assessment in Montney Formation in Western Canada. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-15363-8 ↗
27. Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide10.1073/pnas.1202473109 ↗
28. Investigations of seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured reservoirs based on moment tensors10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103448 ↗
29. Understanding rate effects in injection-induced earthquakes10.1038/s41467-020-16860-y ↗
30. The effects of thermal stress and fluid pressure on induced seismicity during stimulation to production within fractured reservoirs10.1111/ter.12046 ↗
31. Comprehensive in-situ stress estimation in a fractured geothermal reservoir in Pohang, South Korea using drilling data, hydraulic stimulations, and induced seismicity10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105978 ↗
32. Effect of frequency during cyclic hydraulic fracturing and the process of fracture development in laboratory experiments10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104474 ↗
33. An integrated approach to characterize hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity in shale reservoirs10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107624 ↗
34. How to Reduce Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismicity10.1007/s00603-018-1467-4 ↗
35. Managing Induced Seismicity Risks from Enhanced Geothermal Systems: A Good Practice Guideline10.1029/2024RG000849 ↗
36. Controlling fluid-induced seismicity during a 6.1-km-deep geothermal stimulation in Finland10.1126/sciadv.aav7224 ↗
37. Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems10.1016/j.geothermics.2007.03.003 ↗
38. An laboratorial investigation of induced seismicity characteristics in EGS hydraulic fracturing10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102482 ↗
39. A laboratory study on fracture initiation and propagation of granite under cyclic-injection hydraulic fracturing10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110278 ↗
40. Oklahoma’s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal10.1126/sciadv.1500195 ↗
41. The susceptibility of Oklahoma’s basement to seismic reactivation10.1038/s41561-019-0440-5 ↗
42. On the role of poroelastic stressing and pore pressure diffusion in discrete fracture and fault system in triggering post-injection seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105673 ↗
43. Understanding injection-induced seismicity in enhanced geothermal systems: From the coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical process to anthropogenic earthquake prediction10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103182 ↗
44. Discrete element modeling for the multistage hydraulic stimulation of a horizontal well in hot dry rock10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105274 ↗
45. Seismic moments and volume changes10.1029/JB081i008p01487 ↗
46. Effect of natural fractures on determining closure pressure10.1007/s13202-019-00769-4 ↗
47. Xing, P., McLennan, J., and Moore, J. (2020). In-Situ Stress Measurements at the Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) Site. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13215842 ↗
48. Investigation of the effect of different injection schemes on fracture network patterns in hot dry rocks—A numerical case study of the FORGE EGS site in Utah10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104346 ↗
49. Numerical Modeling of Discrete Fractures in a Field-Scale FORGE EGS Reservoir10.1007/s00603-019-01894-6 ↗
50. Circulation experiments at Utah FORGE: Near-surface seismic monitoring reveals fracture growth after shut-in10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.102947 ↗
51. Study on the migration characteristics of temporary plugging agents in hot dry rock fractures considering ambient temperature field variations10.1063/5.0226595 ↗