MiS-PoW: Mirror-Selected Non-Interactive Proof of Ownership for Cloud Storage
Source abstract
Abstract
Cloud storage uses proofs of ownership to avoid redundant uploads while keeping file contents secret. Many existing schemes need extra round trips, or rely on predictable sampling. These choices reduce security when an adversary knows part of the file. We present MiS-PoW, a zero knowledge and non-interactive proof of ownership. The protocol derives a synchronized challenge seed from the existing HTTPS/TLS session. The seed binds a discretized time window and the file identifier. Both parties compute the same challenges locally, and the protocol adds no new messages. MiS-PoW samples blocks with a stratified policy without duplicates. The policy enforces coverage across partitions and reduces the advantage of contiguous knowledge and near duplicate files. The proof layer uses STARKs with simple AIR constraints. The constraints check that indices come from the seed, lie in range, are unique, and meet per partition counts. We analyze security and show seed unpredictability, resistance to replay, and bounds under partial knowledge with limited grinding. A prototype shows that verification time does not grow with file size, and proof and bandwidth costs remain modest. MiS-PoW is deployable, privacy preserving, and scalable for cloud storage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cloud Data Security Solutions · Advanced Data Storage Technologies · Security and Verification in Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510555, China
Huangpu Research School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510555, China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., Steiner, I.M., Herdrich, A.J., Shu, K., Das, R., Cui, L., and Jiang, L. (March, January 27). Libra: Clearing the cloud through dynamic memory bandwidth management. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Virtual.10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00073 ↗
2. Overview of amazon web services
3. Google drive10.5260/chara.14.3.16 ↗
4. Drago, I., Mellia, M., M. Munafo, M., Sperotto, A., Sadre, R., and Pras, A. (2012, January 14–16). Inside dropbox: Understanding personal cloud storage services. Proceedings of the 2012 Internet Measurement Conference, Boston, MA, USA.10.1145/2398776.2398827 ↗
5. Cisco (2018). Cisco Global Cloud Index: Forecast and Methodology, Cisco.
6. A Comprehensive Study of the Past, Present, and Future of Data Deduplication10.1109/JPROC.2016.2571298 ↗
7. Leveraging Data Deduplication Approaches in the Cloud Storage: A Succinct Review10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.119 ↗
8. Halevi, S., Harnik, D., Pinkas, B., and Shulman-Peleg, A. (2011, January 17–21). Proofs of ownership in remote storage systems. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/2046707.2046765 ↗
9. (2025, September 10). Dropship. Dropbox API Utilities. GitHub Repository Driverdan/Dropship. Available online: https://github.com/driverdan/dropship.
10. Blockchain-enabled efficient dynamic cross-domain deduplication in edge computing10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150042 ↗
11. An efficient encrypted deduplication scheme with security-enhanced proof of ownership in edge computing10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100062 ↗
12. Secure and efficient ownership verification for deduplicated cloud computing systems10.1186/s13677-025-00743-y ↗
13. Yang, Z., Tian, W., Li, R., Ye, X., and Xu, Z. (2024, January 17–21). Who Owns the Cloud Data? Exploring a non-interactive way for secure proof of ownership. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), Sanya, China.10.1109/TrustCom63139.2024.00206 ↗
14. Di Pietro, R., and Sorniotti, A. (2012, January 2–4). Boosting efficiency and security in proof of ownership for deduplication. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1145/2414456.2414504 ↗
15. Proof of ownership for deduplication systems: A secure, scalable, and efficient solution10.1016/j.comcom.2016.01.011 ↗
16. Xu, J., Chang, E.C., and Zhou, J. (2013, January 4–8). Weak leakage-resilient client-side deduplication of encrypted data in cloud storage. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSAC Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, Berlin, Germany.10.1145/2484313.2484340 ↗
17. You, W., and Chen, B. (2022, January 19–22). Proofs of ownership on encrypted cloud data via Intel SGX. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, Rome, Italy.10.1007/978-3-030-61638-0_22 ↗
18. Secure auditing and deduplicating data in cloud10.1109/TC.2015.2389960 ↗
19. Secure proof of ownership using merkle tree for deduplicated storage10.3103/S0146411620040033 ↗
20. Blasco, J., Di Pietro, R., Orfila, A., and Sorniotti, A. (2014, January 29–31). A tunable proof of ownership scheme for deduplication using bloom filters. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/CNS.2014.6997518 ↗
21. ms-PoSW: A multi-server aided proof of shared ownership scheme for secure deduplication in cloud10.1002/cpe.4252 ↗
22. González-Manzano, L., de Fuentes, J.M., and Choo, K.K.R. (2016, January 10–12). ase-PoW: A proof of ownership mechanism for cloud deduplication in hierarchical environments. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Systems, Guangzhou, China.
23. An efficient confidentiality-preserving proof of ownership for deduplication10.1016/j.jnca.2014.12.004 ↗
24. Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Tromer, E., and Virza, M. (2014, January 20–22). Succinct Non-Interactive zero knowledge for a von neumann architecture. Proceedings of the 23rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 14), San Diego, CA, USA.
25. Chen, T., Lu, H., Kunpittaya, T., and Luo, A. (2022). A review of zk-snarks. arXiv.
26. Su, S., Yuan, F., Yuan, Y., Zeng, L., and Chen, C. (2021, January 5–8). VoFSQ: An efficient file-sharing interactive verification protocol. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ISCC53001.2021.9631478 ↗
27. Ben-Sasson, E., Bentov, I., Horesh, Y., and Riabzev, M. (2018). Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity. Cryptology ePrint Archive.
28. A secure client-side deduplication scheme based on updatable server-aided encryption10.1109/TCC.2023.3311760 ↗