journal article·2025-11-10Open access

Outflow Boundary Conditions for Turbine-Integrated Rotating Detonation Combustors

Tsung-Ming Hsieh, K. Mark Bryden, Richard P. Dalton, John Crane, Tom I-P. Shih

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

This study examines outflow boundary conditions (BCs) in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of a transition duct with and without guide vanes that converts supersonic flow exiting a rotating detonation combustor (RDC) to subsonic flow to drive a turbine. Since the flow exiting the transition duct has swirling shock waves with significant spatial and temporal variations in pressure, temperature, and Mach number, imposing proper BCs poses a challenge. To ensure all swirling shock waves exit the transition duct without creating non-physical reflected waves at its outlet, this study examined three outflow BCs: (1) the average pressure imposed at the duct’s outlet, (2) a nonreflecting BC (NRBC) with a specified average pressure imposed at the duct’s outlet, (3) the average pressure imposed at the outlet of an extension duct made up of a buffer layer and a sponge layer. This study is based on the three-dimensional, unsteady density-weighted-ensemble-averaged continuity, Navier–Stokes, and energy equations for a thermally perfect gas closed by the realizable k–ε model and “enhanced” wall functions. The results obtained show that imposing an average pressure at the transition duct’s outlet produces spurious waves that degrade the physical meaningfulness of the solution. When the NRBC was applied, swirling shock waves exited the duct’s outlet without creating spurious waves. However, its usage requires the gas to be thermally, as well as calorically, perfect, which this study shows could be a concern. By imposing the average pressure at the outlet of an extension duct, the gas does not need to be calorically perfect. The results obtained show the effects of the sponge layer’s length and coarsening ratio on damping nonuniformities in non-physical reflected waves to ensure the flow exiting the transition duct’s outlet can do so as if there are no boundaries present and has the desired average pressure—even though the BC is applied at the extension duct’s outlet.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Combustion and Detonation Processes · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Combustion and flame dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Ames National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, IA 50010, USA

National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA

National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA

Funding

US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory · US Department of Energy Ames National Laboratory

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Goddard, R.H. (1949). Reaction Combustion Chamber for Unconfined Charges of Detonative Fuel Fed Intermittently to the Combustion Chamber. (No. 2,465,525), U.S. Patent.
2. Feasibility Studies of a Rotating Detonation Wave Rocket Motor10.2514/3.28557 ↗
3. Performance Analysis of a Rotating Detonation Wave Rocket Engine (Rotating Detonation Wave Rocket Engine Performance Analyzed and Compared to Conventional Rocket Engines)
4. Continuous Spin Detonations10.2514/1.17656 ↗
5. Rotating Detonation Wave Propulsion: Experimental Challenges, Modeling, ad Engine Concepts10.2514/1.B34802 ↗
6. Numerical Investigation of Shock Wave Reflections near the Head Ends of Rotating Detonation Engines10.1007/s00193-013-0440-0 ↗
7. Escobar, S. (2014). Rotating Detonation Combustion: A Computational Study for Stationary Power Generation. [Ph.D. Thesis, West Virginia University].
8. Design and analysis of pioneering high supersonic axial turbines10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.014 ↗
9. The Effects of Multiple Detonation Waves10.1016/j.trpro.2018.02.035 ↗
10. Performance Analysis of Dual-Duct Rotating Detonation Aero-Turbine Engine10.1016/j.ast.2019.07.011 ↗
11. Lietz, C., Desai, Y., Munipalli, R., Schumaker, S.A., and Sankaran, V. (2019, January 7–11). Flowfield Analysis of a 3D Simulation of a Rotating Detonation Rocket Engine. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2019-1009 ↗
12. Theoretical and Numerical Investigation on Total Pressure Gain in Rotating Detonation Engine10.2514/1.J059259 ↗
13. Integration of a Transonic High-Pressure Turbine with a Rotating Detonation Combustor and a Diffuser10.1515/tjj-2020-0016 ↗
14. Numerical Simulation of a Methane–Oxygen Rotating Detonation Rocket Engine10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.288 ↗
15. Mixing and Detonation Structure in a Rotating Detonation Engine with an Axial Air Inlet10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.283 ↗
16. Mass Flow Rate Effect on a Rotating Detonation Combustor with an Axial Air Injection10.1007/s00193-020-00984-7 ↗
17. Numerical Study on the Interaction Characterization of Rotating Detonation Wave and Turbine Rotor Blades10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.043 ↗
18. Effects of Supersonic Nozzle Guide Vanes on the Performance and Flow Structures of a Rotating Detonation Combustor10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.01.002 ↗
19. Sridhara, S.R., Andreini, A., Polanka, M.D., and Bohon, M.D. (2024, January 24–28). LES Investigation of Film Cooling in Rotating Detonation Combustors. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2024: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, London, UK.
20. Performance Characteristics of a Rotating Detonation Combustor Exiting into a Pressurized Plenum to Simulate Gas Turbine Inlet10.1115/1.4063710 ↗
21. Numerical Study on the Interaction between Rotating Detonation Wave and Turbine Stator Blades with Multicomponent Mixtures10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.065 ↗
22. Dille, K.J., Slabaugh, C.D., and Heister, S.D. (2024, January 8–12). Rotating Detonation Combustor Performance Modelling Informed by Experimental Stagnation Pressure Measurements. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2024-2792 ↗
23. Large-Eddy Simulation Study of Flow and Combustion Dynamics in a Full-Scale Hydrogen-Air Rotating Detonation Combustor-Stator Integrated System10.1115/1.4066365 ↗
24. Chamber Length Limits of a Continuously Variable Geometry Rotating Detonation Combustor10.2514/1.B39600 ↗
25. Incompletely Parabolic Problems in Fluid Dynamics10.1137/0135030 ↗
26. A Non-Reflecting Outflow Boundary Condition for Subsonic Navier–Stokes Calculations10.1016/0021-9991(80)90174-6 ↗
27. Approximation of Radiation Boundary Conditions10.1016/0021-9991(81)90082-6 ↗
28. Time Dependent Boundary Conditions for Hyperbolic Systems10.1016/0021-9991(87)90041-6 ↗
29. Far-Field Boundary Conditions for Time-Dependant Hyperbolic Systems10.1137/0909054 ↗
30. Giles, M.B. (1988). Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equations, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. TR CFDL-TR-88-1.
31. Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equation Calculations10.2514/3.10521 ↗
32. Time Dependent Boundary Conditions for Hyperbolic Systems II10.1016/0021-9991(90)90152-Q ↗
33. Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulations of Compressible Viscous Flows10.1016/0021-9991(92)90046-2 ↗
34. Boundary Conditions for Direct Computation of Aerodynamic Sound Generation10.2514/3.11817 ↗
35. Actual Impedance of Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions: Implications for Computation of Resonators10.2514/1.1883 ↗
36. Absorbing Boundary Conditions for Nonlinear Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations Based on the Perfectly Matched Layer Technique10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.010 ↗
37. Analysis of Stretched Grids and Buffer Zones in Simulations of Wave Propagation10.1016/j.apnum.2016.04.008 ↗
38. Navier-Stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions for Real Fluids with Kinetic-Energy- and Pressure-Equilibrium Preserving Schemes10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114035 ↗
39. Kuo, K.K. (1986). Principles of Combustion, Wiley.
40. White, F.M. (2006). Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw-Hill. [3rd ed.].
41. McBride, B.J., Zehe, M.J., and Gordon, S. (2002). NASA Glenn Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Species, Glenn Research Center. NASA/TP–2002-211556.
42. A New k-ε Eddy-Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows—Model Development and Validation10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T ↗
43. Temperature and Concentration Profiles in Fully Turbulent Boundary Layers10.1016/0017-9310(81)90220-9 ↗
44. Chima, R.V., and Liou, M.S. (2003, January 23–26). Comparison of the AUSM+ and H-CUSP Schemes for Turbomachinery Applications. Proceedings of the 33rd Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2003-4120 ↗
45. ANSYS FLUENT (2025, November 05). Computational Fluid Dynamic Code Manual, Version 2024R2. Available online: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/public/account/secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/prod_page.html?pn=Fluent&prodver=24.2&lang=en.