IbiboRPLChain II: A Blockchain-Enhanced Security Framework for Mitigating Routing Attacks in IoT-RPL Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) continues to expand rapidly, with the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) serving as its core communication backbone. However, RPL remains vulnerable to a range of insider routing attacks such as the Version Number Attack (VNA) and Hello Flooding Attack (HFA), particularly in constrained IoT environments. In our previous work, IbiboRPLChain, we proposed a blockchain-based authentication mechanism to secure communication between routing and sensor nodes. This paper presents an evolved framework, IbiboRPLChain II, which integrates smart contracts, decentralised authentication nodes, and composite blockchain mechanisms to improve network resilience, scalability, and security. Our experiments, conducted using Cooja and Contiki OS, evaluate the system across multiple simulation seeds, demonstrating significant gains in Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), energy efficiency, and delay mitigation. IbiboRPLChain II proves to be a robust solution for secure, lightweight, and scalable RPL-based IoT environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Security in Wireless Sensor Networks · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Network Security and Intrusion Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computing, Engineering & Digital Technologies, Teesside University Middlesbrough, Middlesbrough TS1 3BQ, UK
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Tan, Z., Wu, Y., and Xu, M. (2024). IoT Attacks Countermeasures: Systematic Review and Future Research Direction. Big Data Technologies and Applications. BDTA 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-52265-9 ↗
2. Tran, K.P., Li, S., Heuchenne, C., and Truong, T.H. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis and Comprehensive Overview of Security Attacks Against RPL in IoT Networks. The Seventh International Conference on Safety and Security with IoT. SaSeIoT 2023, Springer.
3. Tran, K.P., Li, S., Heuchenne, C., and Truong, T.H. (2024). RPL Protocol Using Contiki Operating Systems: A Review. The Seventh International Conference on Safety and Security with IoT. SaSeIoT 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-53028-9 ↗
4. Leonardos, S., Reijsbergen, D., and Piliouras, G. (2020). PREStO: A Systematic Framework for Blockchain Consensus Protocols. arXiv.10.1109/TEM.2020.2981286 ↗
5. A graph model based blockchain implementation for increasing performance and security in decentralized ledger systems10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006383 ↗
6. RPL: The Routing Standard for the Internet of Things10.1109/MCOM.2016.1600397CM ↗
7. Pongle, P., and Chavan, G. (2015, January 10–13). A survey: Attacks on RPL and 6LoWPAN in IoT. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, Kerala, India.10.1109/PERVASIVE.2015.7087034 ↗
8. A lightweight scheme for mitigating RPL version number attacks in IoT networks10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3215460 ↗
9. A Lightweight Mitigation Technique Against a Modified Version Number Attack in IoT Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535166 ↗
10. Almusaylim, Z.A., Jhanjhi, N.Z., and Alhumam, A. (2020). Detection and mitigation of RPL rank and version number attacks in the internet of things: SRPL-RP. Sensors, 20.10.20944/preprints202007.0476.v1 ↗
11. CTrust-RPL: A control layer-based trust mechanism for supporting secure routing in routing protocol for low power and lossy networks-based Internet of Things applications10.1002/ett.4224 ↗
12. Robust Event-triggered Dynamic Average Consensus against Communication Link Failures with Application to Battery Control10.1109/TCNS.2020.2986515 ↗
13. Blockchain meets IoT: An architecture for scalable access management
14. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339 ↗
15. Bano, S., Sonnino, A., Al-Bassam, M., Azouvi, S., McCorry, P., Meiklejohn, S., and Danezis, G. (2019, January 21–23). SoK: Consensus in the age of blockchains. Proceedings of the AFT ‘19: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland.
16. Ouroboros: A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol10.1007/978-3-319-63688-7_12 ↗
17. Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance
18. (2025, July 15). Hyperledger Besu Documentation: IBFT 2.0. Available online: https://besu.hyperledger.org/private-networks/how-to/configure/consensus/ibft.
19. Ibibo, J.T., Balota, J.E., Alwada’n, T., and Akinade, O.O. (2025). Enhancing IoT-LLN Security with IbiboRPLChain Solution: A Blockchain-Based Authentication Method. Appl. Sci., 15.10.20944/preprints202509.0130.v1 ↗
20. Ibibo, J.T. (2023, January 6–8). Emerging Challenges and Solutions in RPL Protocol: Research Review. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 28th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD), Edinburgh, UK.10.1109/CAMAD59638.2023.10478429 ↗
21. Hummen, H., Hiller, J., Wirtz, H., and Wehrle, K. (2013, January 17–19). 6LoWPAN fragmentation attacks and mitigation mechanisms. Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, Budapest, Hungary.10.1145/2462096.2462107 ↗
22. A lightweight intrusion detection for sybil attack under mobile RPL in the internet of things10.1109/JIOT.2019.2948149 ↗
23. SVELTE: Real-time Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.04.014 ↗
24. A Taxonomy of Attacks in RPL-based Internet of Things
25. Blockchain: A Panacea for Healthcare Cloud-Based Data Security and Privacy?10.1109/MCC.2018.011791712 ↗
26. Fabric-iot: A Blockchain Based Access Control System in IoT
27. Privacy-preserving schemes for ad hoc social networks: A survey10.1109/COMST.2017.2718178 ↗
28. AIDoaies, B.H., and Almagwashi, H. (2018, January 25–26). Exploitation of the Promising Technology: Using BlockChain to Enhance the Security of IoT. Proceedings of the 2018 21st Saudi Computer Society National Computer Conference (NCC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.10.1109/NCG.2018.8593102 ↗
29. Stochastic Semistability for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Application to Consensus on Networks with Communication Uncertainty10.1109/TAC.2019.2934430 ↗
30. A Secure FaBric Blockchain-Based Data Transmission Technique for Industrial Internet-of-Things10.1109/TII.2019.2907092 ↗
31. Sprite: A simple, cheat-proof, credit-based system for mobile ad hoc networks
32. A Service-Oriented Permissioned Blockchain for the Internet of Things
33. Rohloff, K., Bonneau, J., Miller, A., Ryan, P.Y.A., Teague, V., Bracciali, A., Sala, M., Pintore, F., and Jakobsson, M. (2017). A proof-of-stake protocol for consensus on bitcoin subchains. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Springer.
34. Managing QoS of Internet-of-Things Services Using Blockchain10.1109/TCSS.2019.2919667 ↗
35. Blockchain for Secure-GaS: Blockchain-powered Secure Natural Gas IoT System with AI-enabled Gas Prediction and Transaction in Smart City10.1109/JIOT.2020.3028773 ↗
36. Dunkels, A., Grönvall, B., and Voigt, T. (2004, January 16–18). Contiki—A lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. Proceedings of the 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, Tampa, FL, USA.
37. Industrial Wireless IP-based Cyber-Physical Systems10.1109/JPROC.2015.2509186 ↗
38. Tsiftes, N., Dunkels, A., and Eriksson, J. (2010, January 3–5). Low-Power Wireless IPv6 Routing with ContikiRPL. Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), Zürich, Switzerland.10.1145/1791212.1791277 ↗
39. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger
40. Blockchain Technologies for the Internet of Things: Research Issues and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2018.2882794 ↗
41. Winter, T., Thubert, P., Brandt, A., Hui, J., Kelsey, R., Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur, J.P., and Alexander, R. (2025, October 12). RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks; IETF RFC 6550, March 2012. 157p. Available online: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6550.