journal article·2025-11-06Open access

Curriculum Learning and Pattern-Aware Highly Efficient Privacy-Preserving Scheme for Mixed Data Outsourcing with Minimal Utility Loss

Abdul Majeed, Kyunghyun Lee, Seong Oun Hwang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

A complex problem when outsourcing personal data for public use is balancing privacy protection with utility, and anonymization is a viable solution to address this issue. However, conventional anonymization methods often overlook global information regarding the composition of attributes in data, leading to unnecessary computations and high utility loss. To address these problems, we propose a curriculum learning (CL)-based, pattern-aware privacy-preserving scheme that exploits information about attribute composition in the data to enhance utility and privacy without performing unnecessary computations. The CL approach significantly reduces time overheads by sorting data by complexity, and only the most complex (e.g., privacy-sensitive) parts of the data are processed. Our scheme considers both diversity and similarity when forming clusters to effectively address the privacy–utility trade-off. Our scheme prevents substantial changes in data during generalization by protecting generic portions of the data from futile anonymization, and only a limited amount of data is anonymized through a joint application of differential privacy and k-anonymity. We attain promising results by rigorously testing the proposed scheme on three benchmark datasets. Compared to recent anonymization methods, our scheme reduces time complexity by 74.33%, improves data utility by 19.67% and 68.33% across two evaluation metrics, and enhances privacy protection by 29.19%. Our scheme performs 82.66% fewer lookups in generalization hierarchies than existing anonymization methods. In addition, our scheme is very lightweight and is 1.95× faster than the parallel implementation architectures. Our scheme can effectively solve the trade-off between privacy and utility better than prior works in outsourcing personal data enclosed in tabular form.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Data Quality and Management · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Secure Cyber Systems Research Group, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Department of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Gachon University research

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Data analytics in a privacy-concerned world10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.005 ↗
2. Secret Specification Based Personalized Privacy-Preserving Analysis in Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2024.3433433 ↗
3. Garfinkel, S., Near, J., Dajani, A., Singer, P., and Guttman, B. (2023). De-Identifying Government Datasets: Techniques and Governance, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).10.6028/NIST.SP.800-188 ↗
4. Dwork, C. (2006, January 10–14). Differential privacy. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, Venice, Italy.10.1007/11787006_1 ↗
5. The limits of differential privacy (and its misuse in data release and machine learning)10.1145/3433638 ↗
6. Protecting respondents identities in microdata release10.1109/69.971193 ↗
7. l-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity10.1145/1217299.1217302 ↗
8. Li, N., Li, T., and Venkatasubramanian, S. (2007, January 15–20). t-closeness: Privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ICDE.2007.367856 ↗
9. Outsourced and Privacy-Preserving Collaborative K-Prototype Clustering for Mixed Data via Additive Secret Sharing10.1109/JIOT.2023.3266028 ↗
10. A clustering-based anonymization approach for privacy-preserving in the healthcare cloud10.1002/cpe.6487 ↗
11. Data privacy and trustworthy machine learning10.1109/MSEC.2022.3178187 ↗
12. Practical anonymization for data streams: Z-anonymity and relation with k-anonymity10.1016/j.peva.2022.102329 ↗
13. Sowmyarani, C., Namya, L., Nidhi, G., and Kumar, P.R. (2023, January 24–26). Analysis and Optimization of Clustering-based Privacy Preservation using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT), Goa, India.10.1109/ICONAT57137.2023.10080207 ↗
14. Characterisation and quantification of user privacy: Key challenges, regulations, and future directions10.1109/COMST.2024.3519861 ↗
15. Privacy Utility Tradeoff Between PETs: Differential Privacy and Synthetic Data10.1109/TCSS.2024.3479317 ↗
16. Protecting privacy in the age of big data: Exploring data linking methods for quasi-identifier selection10.1007/s10207-024-00944-7 ↗
17. Ud-ldp: A technique for optimally catalyzing user driven local differential privacy10.1016/j.future.2025.107712 ↗
18. UtilityAware: A Framework for Data Privacy Protection in e-Health10.1016/j.ins.2023.119247 ↗
19. An efficient clustering-based anonymization scheme for privacy-preserving data collection in IoT based healthcare services10.1007/s12083-021-01077-7 ↗
20. Xia, Y., Zhao, T., Lv, Y., Li, Y., and Yang, R. (2023, January 19–22). Hierarchical DP-K Anonymous Data Publishing Model Based on Binary Tree. Proceedings of the 2023 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea.10.23919/ICACT56868.2023.10079551 ↗
21. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Clustering-Based K-Anonymity and KNN Cluster for Privacy Preservation
22. Apache Flink and clustering-based framework for fast anonymization of IoT stream data
23. Amiri, F., Khan, R., Anjum, A., Syed, M.H., and Rehman, S. (2023). Enhancing Utility in Anonymized Data against the Adversary’s Background Knowledge. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13074091 ↗
24. Differential Privacy and k-Anonymity-Based Privacy Preserving Data Publishing Scheme with Minimal Loss of Statistical Information10.1109/TCSS.2023.3320141 ↗
25. MRMondrian: Scalable multidimensional anonymisation for big data privacy preservation10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2787661 ↗
26. Improved l-diversity: Scalable anonymization approach for privacy preserving big data publishing10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.08.006 ↗
27. Azad, M.W.A., Sarwar, S., Taki, S.U., and Mastorakis, S. (2023). The Case for the Anonymization of Offloaded Computation. arXiv.10.1109/CLOUD60044.2023.00019 ↗
28. Kim, S.S. (2023). A New Approach for Anonymizing Transaction Data with Set Values. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12143047 ↗
29. Evolutionary dynamic database partitioning optimization for privacy and utility10.1109/TDSC.2023.3302284 ↗
30. Adaptive k-anonymity approach for privacy preserving in cloud10.1007/s13369-019-03999-0 ↗
31. A new method of privacy protection: Random k-anonymous10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919165 ↗
32. Privacy preserving attribute-focused anonymization scheme for healthcare data publishing10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199433 ↗
33. Design of privacy preserving model based on clustering involved anonymization along with feature selection10.1016/j.cose.2022.103027 ↗
34. Fan, Y., Shi, X., Zhang, S., and Tong, Y. (2023). Anonymous Methods Based on Multi-Attribute Clustering and Generalization Constraints. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12081897 ↗
35. Scalable Distributed Data Anonymization for Large Datasets
36. Attack Risk Analysis in Data Anonymization in Internet of Things10.1109/TCSS.2023.3243089 ↗
37. Quantifying the Effects of Anonymization Techniques over Micro-databases10.1109/TETC.2022.3141754 ↗
38. Cyclical curriculum learning10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3265331 ↗
39. Zhang, C., Jiang, H., Wang, Y., Hu, Q., Yu, J., and Cheng, X. (2019, January 23–25). User identity de-anonymization based on attributes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, Harbin, China.10.1007/978-3-030-23597-0_37 ↗
40. McSherry, F.D. (July, January 29). Privacy integrated queries: An extensible platform for privacy-preserving data analysis. Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Providence, RI, USA.10.1145/1559845.1559850 ↗
41. Newman, D. (2025, June 05). UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases, University of California, Irvine. Available online: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/.
42. Proximity Measurement for Hierarchical Categorical Attributes in Big Data
43. Chaotic geometric data perturbed and ensemble gradient homomorphic privacy preservation over big healthcare data
44. Towards practical differential privacy in data analysis: Understanding the effect of epsilon on utility in private erm10.1016/j.cose.2023.103147 ↗
45. Domingo-Ferrer, J., and Sánchez, D. (2025). How to Get Actual Privacy and Utility from Privacy Models: The k-Anonymity and Differential Privacy Families. arXiv.
46. Dp2-pub: Differentially private high-dimensional data publication with invariant post randomization10.1109/TKDE.2023.3265605 ↗
47. Differential privacy performance evaluation under the condition of non-uniform noise distribution
48. η-Inference: A Data-Aware and High-Utility Privacy Model for Relational Data Publishing10.1109/TDSC.2025.3543205 ↗
49. Maximizing data utility while preserving privacy through database fragmentation10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126873 ↗