journal article·2025-10-31Open access

Evaluating a Metahuman-Integrated Computer-Based Training Tool for Nursing Interventions: Usability and Expert Heuristic Analysis

Aeri Jang, Hyunju Jeong, Yunhee Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

Advances in immersive technologies, such as Metahuman Creator integrated with Unreal Engine, offer new opportunities for interactive and realistic digital learning in nursing education. While computer-based training (CBT) has demonstrated benefits for self-directed learning, limited research has examined the usability and reliability of Metahuman-based digital textbooks (DTs) in clinical nursing education. This study aims to evaluate the usability of a Metahuman-based CBT DT for nursing interventions using a multi-method approach combining user testing and expert heuristic evaluation. A total of 12 undergraduate nursing students and 4 nursing education experts used the program, which included two clinical scenarios (nursing care for ileus and upper gastrointestinal bleeding), and completed the user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS). Experts conducted a heuristic evaluation based on eight mobile usability principles. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative feedback was evaluated through inductive content analysis. The students rated the overall usability as high (mean uMARS score = 4.25/5), particularly for layout and graphics. Experts provided moderately positive ratings (mean = 3.71/5) but identified critical issues in error prevention, consistency, and user control. Qualitative feedback emphasized the need for automatic data saving, clearer navigation, improved credibility of information sources, and enhanced interactivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Health Education and Validation · Electronic Health Records Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, 1666 Yeongsan-ro, Cheonggye-myeon, Muan-gun 58554, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Nursing, Nambu University, 1 Nambu 1-gil, Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju 62271, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. The potential of virtual cloud character creation technology-meta human creator: A review10.1063/5.0154732 ↗
2. Fang, Z., Cai, L., and Wang, G. (2021, January 4–6). MetaHuman creator the starting point of the metaverse. Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Computer Technology and Information Science (ISCTIS), Guilin, China.10.1109/ISCTIS51085.2021.00040 ↗
3. Chojnowski, O., Eberhard, A., Schiffmann, M., Müller, A., and Richert, A. (2025, January 3–6). Human-like nonverbal behavior with metahumans in real-world interaction studies: An architecture using generative methods and motion capture. Proceedings of the 2025 20th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/HRI61500.2025.10973925 ↗
4. Salehi, P., Sheshkal, S.A., Thambawita, V., and Halvorsen, P. (2025). From flat to feeling: A feasibility and impact study on dynamic facial emotions in AI-generated avatars. arXiv.
5. Schunk, D.H., and Zimmerman, B.J. (2023). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, Routledge. [3rd ed.].10.4324/9780203763353 ↗
6. Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004 ↗
7. Ryoo, K., and Winkelmann, K. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning. Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6 ↗
8. Yaseen, H., Mohammad, A.S., Ashal, N., Abusaimeh, H., Ali, A., and Sharabati, A.-A.A. (2025). The impact of adaptive learning technologies, personalized feedback, and interactive AI tools on student engagement: The moderating role of digital literacy. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17031133 ↗
9. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering, Morgan Kauffman.10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50009-7 ↗
10. Bertini, E., Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S., Catarci, T., and Santucci, G. (2006, January 23–26). Appropriating and assessing heuristics for mobile computing. Proceedings of the AVI ’06: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Venezia, Italy.10.1145/1133265.1133291 ↗
11. Choi, H., Tak, S.H., and Lee, D. (2023). Nursing students’ learning flow, self efficacy and satisfaction in virtual clinical simulation and clinical case seminar. BMC Nurs., 22.10.1186/s12912-023-01621-1 ↗
12. Virtual reality simulation in nursing and midwifery education: A usability study
13. Virtual reality simulation for learning wound dressing: Acceptance and usability10.1016/j.ecns.2022.04.010 ↗
14. Evaluation of metahumans as digital tutors in augmented reality in medical training10.1515/cdbme-2023-1011 ↗
15. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces10.1145/503112.503114 ↗
16. Procedures of user-centered usability assessment for digital solutions: Scoping review of reviews reporting on digital solutions relevant for older adults10.2196/22774 ↗
17. A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012 ↗
18. Number of people required for usability evaluation: The 10 ± 2 rule10.1145/1735223.1735255 ↗
19. Mobile app rating scale: A new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps10.2196/mhealth.3422 ↗
20. IBM Corp (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, 2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0.
21. Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K.M. (May, January 27). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proceedings of the CHI ’91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA.
22. The qualitative content analysis process10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x ↗
23. Factors that impact student frustration in digital learning environments10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100153 ↗
24. Nielsen, J. (2025, August 07). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Available online: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.
25. Perceptions and needs for a community nursing virtual simulation system: A qualitative study10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28473 ↗
26. Kiegaldie, D., and Shaw, L. (2023). Virtual reality simulation for nursing education: Effectiveness and feasibility. BMC Nurs., 22.10.1186/s12912-023-01639-5 ↗
27. Exploring insights from online students: Enhancing the design and development of intelligent textbooks for the future of online education10.1615/IntJInnovOnlineEdu.2023049742 ↗