journal article·2025-10-31Open access

Evaluating the Suitability of Additive Manufacturing for Fabricating Prosthetic Fingers in Upper Limb Prostheses

Yuliia Denysenko, Filip Górski, Răzvan Păcurar, Natalia Soczyńska, Radosław Wichniarek

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

The development of cosmetic prostheses benefits significantly from the integration of additive manufacturing technologies, which offer new possibilities for personalization, rapid production, and cost efficiency. This study explores the potential of selected additive manufacturing methods for fabricating prosthetic fingers used in upper limb cosmetic prostheses. Esthetic and mechanical properties of the printed components were assessed alongside production efficiency and material use. Quantitatively, maximum bending loads ranged from 9 to 136 N, maximum compressive loads from 12 to 158 N, and sample mass from 4 to 22 g across configurations. The findings confirm that additive manufacturing enables the creation of prosthetic components that meet basic cosmetic and functional expectations. However, the choice of manufacturing method strongly influences surface quality, structural performance, production time, and economic feasibility. These results highlight the importance of matching technological capabilities with specific clinical and design requirements. The study contributes to the ongoing development of digital fabrication workflows for prosthetics and underscores the need for standardized evaluation criteria to support reliable comparisons across materials and manufacturing processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 STR, 61-138 Poznan, Poland

Faculty of Technical Systems and Energy Efficiency Technologies, Sumy State University, Kharkivska 117 Str., 40000 Sumy, Ukraine

Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Bld. Muncii, No. 103-105, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Funding

ERASMUS + Partnerships for cooperation and exchanges of practices · Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Aesthetic finger prosthesis10.1007/s13191-011-0074-9 ↗
2. Trends in the management of traumatic upper extremity amputations10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.006 ↗
3. Fabrication of a functional finger prosthesis with simple attachment10.1007/s13191-012-0228-4 ↗
4. The design and development of a gloveless endoskeletal prosthetic hand
5. Irshad, N., and Bint Khalil, J. (2019, January 2–3). Prosthetic hand modelling, analysis and comparison. Proceedings of the 2019 15th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), Peshawar, Pakistan.10.1109/ICET48972.2019.8994332 ↗
6. A hand prosthesis with an under-actuated and self-adaptive finger mechanism10.4236/eng.2018.107031 ↗
7. Children’s and adolescents’ views on upper limb prostheses in relation to their daily occupations10.1177/0308022619865179 ↗
8. Additive manufacturing for prostheses development: State of the art10.1108/RPJ-01-2022-0029 ↗
9. 3D-printed prostheses in developing countries: A systematic review10.1097/PXR.0000000000000057 ↗
10. Past, present, and future of soft-tissue prosthetics: Advanced polymers and advanced manufacturing10.1002/adma.202001122 ↗
11. Chruściel, J.J. (2025). Most important biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of silicones. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18112561 ↗
12. Restoration of a traumatically amputated finger by a traditional glove-type prosthesis: A case report
13. Avila, J.L.O., Avila, M.O., Aguilar, D.A., and Cardona, M. (2021, January 16–18). Propose method for the design of a transtibial prosthesis using generative CAD/FEM analysis and additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applied Network Technologies (ICMLANT), Virtual.10.1109/ICMLANT53170.2021.9690535 ↗
14. Polymer design for 3D printing elastomers: Recent advances in structure, properties, and printing10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101144 ↗
15. An insight into the tensile anisotropy of 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane
16. Do low-cost 3-dimensional printers produce suitable dental models? Am10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.06.018 ↗
17. Harnany, D., Ramadhan, M.A., Ardianto, H., and Muflikhun, M.A. (2024). Synergizing strength and flexibility: Investigating mechanical properties of photopolymer resin blends in DLP 3D printing. Prog. Addit. Manuf., in press.10.1007/s40964-024-00910-8 ↗
18. Comparison of mechanical properties of different 3D printing technologies10.1038/s41598-025-03632-1 ↗
19. Boualleg, A., Cirkl, D., and Weeger, O. (2025). Computational design of 3D printed flexible Voronoi lattices. Prog. Addit. Manuf.10.1007/s40964-025-01274-3 ↗
20. Ngan, C.G., O’Connell, C.D., Blanchard, R., Boyd-Moss, M., Williams, R.J., Bourke, J., and Choong, P.F.M. (2019). Optimising the biocompatibility of 3D printed photopolymer constructs in vitro and in vivo. Biomed. Mater., 14.10.1088/1748-605X/ab09c4 ↗
21. Aftab, M., Ikram, S., Ullah, M., Khan, N., Naeem, M., Khan, M.A., and Qizi, O.K.A. (2025). Recent trends and future directions in 3D printing of biocompatible polymers. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 9.10.3390/jmmp9040129 ↗
22. (2019). Plastics—Determination of Flexural Properties (Standard No. ISO 178:2019).
23. (2020). Plastics—Determination of Compressive Properties (Standard No. ISO 604:2020).