journal article·2025-10-30Open access

Towards Climate-Just and Sustainable Schools: Developing the Level(s)+37 Passive Design Framework

Carmen Díaz-López, Antonio Serrano-Jimenez, Konstantin Verichev, Ángela Barrios-Padura

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

This study presents the Level(s)+37 Framework, a decision-support tool consisting of 37 indicators designed to evaluate and enhance passive design performance, social equity, and climate resilience in primary and secondary schools. Aligned with the six macro-objectives of the European Level(s) scheme, the indicators are organised into seven thematic clusters—thermal comfort, indoor air quality, solar control and daylighting, environmental ergonomics, ecological sustainability and circular economy, climate justice and social equity, and educational value with stakeholder participation—covering all life-cycle stages from design to retrofit. The framework was developed through a six-phase mixed-methods protocol, including a systematic review of 210 scientific and regulatory sources, 24 semi-structured interviews with school stakeholders, and a Delphi–AHP involving 170 experts. The resulting hierarchy of indicators (CI < 0.10; Kendall’s W = 0.78) ensures methodological robustness and contextual relevance for the Spanish school building stock. By integrating environmental, technical, and pedagogical dimensions, the Level(s)+37 Framework serves as both an evaluation tool and a catalyst for sustainable transformation, promoting participatory governance and climate-responsive learning environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Educational Environments and Student Outcomes · Sustainability in Higher Education · Environmental Education and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Building Construction I, School of Architecture, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain

Department of Building Construction, School of Architecture, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain

Institute of Civil Works, Austral University of Chile, Valdivia 5091000, Chile

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Classrooms’ indoor environmental conditions affecting the academic achievement of students and teachers in higher education: A systematic literature review10.1111/ina.12745 ↗
2. Energy, economic and environmental benefits of integrating passive design strategies into buildings: A review10.1016/j.rser.2022.112828 ↗
3. European Commission (2025, May 19). Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the Energy Performance of Buildings (Recast). Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1275/oj.
4. Passive action strategies in schools: A scientific mapping towards eco-efficiency in educational buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103598 ↗
5. Instituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la Energía (IDAE) (2025, September 15). Changing Energy Behaviour. Available online: https://www.idae.es/uploads/documentos/documentos_10457_BEHAVE_changing_energy_behaviour_09_c5724555.pdf.
6. European Commission (2022). Long-Term Building Renovation Strategy, European Commission.
7. Selection of nature-based solutions to improve comfort in schools during heat waves
8. Thermal comfort and air quality assessment in public schools in Madrid: Study of three cases during one year
9. Baciu, A., Negussie, Y., Geller, A., and Weinstein, J.N. (2017). The root causes of health inequity. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity, National Academies Press.
10. Jessel, S., Sawyer, S., and Hernández, D. (2019). Energy, poverty, and health in climate change: A comprehensive review of an emerging literature. Front. Public Health., 7.10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357 ↗
11. Energy demand and air quality in social housing buildings: A novel critical review10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114542 ↗
12. European Commission (2025, May 20). Energy Efficiency Directive. Available online: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-directive_en.
13. (2025, September 15). Spain. Drafting of the ERESEE Secretariat-General of the Urban Agenda and Housing Directorate-General of the Urban Agenda and Architecture Subdirectorate-General of Architecture and Construction Secretariat-General of Urban Policy. Available online: https://cdn.mitma.gob.es/portal-web-drupal/ERESSE/ERESEE_2020version_ingles.pdf.
14. (2025, May 20). Spain Código Técnico de la Edificación. Available online: https://www.codigotecnico.org/.
15. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico (2021). Plan Nacional Integrado de Energía y Clima, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico.
16. (2020). Taxonomy Regulation—EUR-Lex (Standard No. EN 2020/852).
17. Sustainable Finance (2025, September 15). The Extended Environmental Taxonomy: Final Report on Taxonomy Extension Options Supporting a Sustainable Transition. Available online: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-03/220329-sustainable-finance-platform-finance-report-environmental-transition-taxonomy_en.pdf.
18. Dodd, N., Cordella, M., Traverso, M., and Donatello, S. (2017). Level(s)—A common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings. Part 3: How to make performance assessments using Level(s) (Beta v1.0), Publications Office of the European Union.
19. Commission Européenne, Direction Générale de L’environnement (2021). Level(s), a Common Language for Building Assessment, Office des Publications de l’Union Européenne.
20. Defining strategies to adopt Level(s) for bringing buildings into the circular economy: A case study of Spain10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125048 ↗
21. UNESCO (2024). Greening Curriculum Guidance: Teaching and Learning for Climate Action, UNESCO.
22. Human adaptation to heat in the context of climate change: A conceptual framework10.1016/j.envres.2024.118803 ↗
23. Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., and Ustinova, M. (2019). The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning: A Synthesis of the Evidence, World Bank.10.1596/978-1-4648-1378-8 ↗
24. Energy savings potential of passive chilled beams vs. air systems in various US climatic zones with different system configurations10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.031 ↗
25. Xie, L., Fan, L., Zhang, D., and Liu, J. (2023). Passive energy conservation strategies for mitigating energy consumption and reducing CO2 emissions in traditional dwellings of Peking area, China. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152316459 ↗
26. Passive strategies for energy-efficient educational facilities: Insights from a Mediterranean primary school10.1016/j.egyr.2024.03.040 ↗
27. Energy saving with passive climate control methods in Spanish office buildings10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.03.004 ↗
28. Bioclimatic strategies in existing multifamily buildings to achieve cities decarbonization goals: Potential and relevance for Catalonia climates10.1016/j.cities.2024.105335 ↗
29. Bienvenido-Huertas, D. (2020). Analysis of the impact of the use profile of HVAC systems established by the Spanish standard to assess residential building energy performance. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12177153 ↗
30. OECD (2005). Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing.
31. Erhorn-Kluttig, H., and Mørck, O. (2005). Energy-Efficient Renovation of Educational Buildings, OECD Publishing.
32. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2004). IEA Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community systems, Annex 36: Case Studies Overview DK1, International Energy Agency (IEA).
33. KBN (2025, June 08). Oslo’s First Positive Energy School. Available online: https://www.kbn.com/en/customer/customers-story/oslos-first-positive-energy-school/.
34. FutureBuilt (2025, June 08). Ruseløkka School Oslo—Pilot Projects. Available online: https://www.futurebuilt.no/English/Pilot-projects#!/English/Pilot-projects/Ruseloekka-School-Oslo.
35. Torcellini, P. (2017). Zero Energy Is an A+ for Education: Discovery Elementary.
36. Ai3 Architects (2025, June 08). Case study: Net zero energy schools—Watertown Schools. Available online: https://ai3architects.com/casestudy-net-zero-energy/.
37. Fundación Ecodes (2025, June 08). Escuelas Renovadas: Un Manifiesto Para Pedir Confort y Bienestar en los Centros Educativos. Available online: https://ecodes.org/hacemos/energia-y-personas/rehabilitacion-energetica-de-viviendas/escuelas-renovadas-un-manifiesto-para-pedir-confort-y-bienestar-en-los-centros-educativos.
38. REHAU (2025, June 08). Rehabilitación Passivhaus en el Colegio El Garrofer de Viladecans. Available online: https://www.rehau.com/es-es/rehabilitacion-passivhaus-en-el-colegio-el-garrofer.
39. Calorusso, C., and Clements, T. (2025, June 08). Transforming the Discussion: Breaking our Landscape Architecture Chrysalis. Available online: www.thecela.org.
40. IESALC (2023). Annual Report 2023, UNESCO Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean.
41. Monitoring and moderating extreme indoor temperatures in low-income urban communities10.1088/1748-9326/abdbf2 ↗
42. Feasibility and retrofit guidelines towards net-zero energy buildings in tropical climates: A case of Ghana10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112252 ↗
43. Surendran, V.M., Irulappan, C., Jeyasingh, V., and Ramalingam, V. (2023). Thermal performance assessment of envelope retrofits for existing school buildings in a hot–humid climate: A case study in Chennai, India. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13041103 ↗
44. Multi-criteria assessment model on environmental ergonomics for decision-making in schoolyards based on remote-sensing and GIS resources10.1016/j.scs.2023.104481 ↗
45. Passive cooling strategies to optimise sustainability and environmental ergonomics in Mediterranean schools based on a critical review10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109297 ↗
46. Home energy retrofit: Reviewing its depth, scale of delivery, and sustainability10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112253 ↗
47. Sensitivity analysis of trends in environmental education in schools and its implications in the built environment10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100795 ↗
48. European Commission, President, M., and Gabriel, M. (2021). New European Bauhaus: Commission Launches Design Phase.
49. Adopting circular economy in construction: A review10.3389/fbuil.2025.1519219 ↗