journal article·2025-10-28Open access

Random Forest-Based Multi-Objective Optimization Design Method of Relief Wells for Levee Safety

A-Wei An, Mi Tian, Wan-Yue Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

Relief well designs mainly focus on conventional parameters such as well diameter and well spacing by engineering experience, lacking rigorous analysis. The impact of wellhead elevation remains unclear. This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization method for determining the design parameters (i.e., the wellhead elevation and number of wells) of relief wells. MODFLOW is used to develop a three-dimensional transient seepage numerical model of the levee. The design parameters of relief wells are optimized by balancing the safety factor and the economic cost by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II). To remove computational burden within NSGA-II, random forest (RF) is used to establish an intelligent surrogate model for evaluating the hydraulic characteristics of levees. The final optimal design parameters are determined by entropy weight and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Finally, the proposed approaches are illustrated using the Wuhan Yangtze River Levee, China. Results show that compared with the empirical approach, the optimal design parameters obtained by the proposed approaches can not only meet the safety threshold for the levee, but also reduce the costs by 15%. The importance of wellhead elevation on the hydraulic gradient is about six times that of the number of wells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dam Engineering and Safety · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, 28 Nanli Road, Wuhan 430068, China

Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, 28 Nanli Road, Wuhan 430068, China

Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Wuhan 430068, China

Funding

National Foreign Experts Program · Special Fund for National Key Laboratories of China Minmetals Corporation Limited · Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China · Outstanding Young and middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of colleges and universities of Hubei Province

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Investigation of underseepage—Mississippi River levees10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000215 ↗
2. The development of centrifugal models to study the influence of uplift pressures on the stability of a flood bank10.1680/geot.1978.28.1.85 ↗
3. Optimum size for clay core of alavian earth dam by numerical simulation
4. Two-dimensional simulation of underground seepage in a dangerous piping zone of the Jingjiang great levee, the middle reach of the Yangtze River10.1144/1470-9236/06-020 ↗
5. Effect of location and angle of cutoff wall on uplift pressure in diversion dam10.1007/s10706-014-9774-3 ↗
6. USACE (1956). Technical Memorandum TM 3-424: Investigation of Underseepage and Its Control, Lower Mississippi River Levees, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Mississippi River Commission.
7. USACE (1993). Engineer Manual EM 1110-2-1901: Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
8. Meehan, C.L., Kumar, S., Pando, M.A., and Coe, J.T. (2019). Finite element modeling of partial penetration well uplift factors. Geo-Congress 2019: Embankments, Dams, and Slopes, Geotechnical Special Publication 305.
9. Numerical investigation of granular filter under the bed of a Canal10.1007/s13201-019-1023-8 ↗
10. Numerical investigation of the optimum location for vertical drains in gravity dams10.1007/s10706-016-0144-1 ↗
11. Fell, R., and Fry, J.J. (2007). Internal Erosion of Dams and Their Foundations: Selected and Reviewed Papers from the Workshop on Internal Erosion and Piping of Dams and Their Foundations, Aussois, France, 25–27 April 2005, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9781482266146 ↗
12. Transient antiseepage analysis of the relief well in Beijiang Dike
13. Keffer, A.M., Guy, E.D., and Grote, K.R. (2023, January 12–15). Finite line relief well system design for dams and levees. Proceedings of the Geo-Congress 2023, Reston, VA, USA.10.1061/9780784484708.004 ↗
14. Mansur, C.I., and Kaufman, R.I. (1962). Dewatering and Control of Groundwater. Foundation Engineering, McGraw-Hill. [1st ed.].
15. Performance of relief well systems along Mississippi River levees10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:8(727) ↗
16. Numerical analysis on factors affecting the effectiveness of relief-well
17. Numerical investigation of relief well performance for decreasing uplift pressure under embankment dams10.1007/s13762-020-03030-2 ↗
18. Relief well evaluation: Three-dimensional modeling and blanket theory10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002547 ↗
19. USACE (1992). Engineer Manual EM 1110-2-1914: Design, Construction, and Maintenance of Relief Wells, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
20. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
21. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for operating parallel reservoir system10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.061 ↗
22. A comprehensive review on NSGA-II for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070634 ↗
23. Selecting model parameter sets from a trade-off surface generated from the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II10.1007/s11269-010-9668-y ↗
24. Modeling and combined application of orthogonal chaotic NSGA-II and improved TOPSIS to optimize a conceptual hydrological model10.1007/s11269-018-2019-0 ↗
25. A review on evolutionary algorithms in Bayesian network learning and inference tasks10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.051 ↗
26. Aquifers management through evolutionary Bayesian networks: The Altiplano case study (SE Spain)10.1007/s11269-011-9893-z ↗
27. Bishop, C.M., and Nasrabadi, N.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer. [2nd ed.].
28. Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3262138 ↗
29. Application of machine learning in groundwater quality modeling: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.watres.2023.119745 ↗
30. Machine learning-based surrogate modeling for urban water networks: Review and future research directions10.1029/2021WR031808 ↗
31. Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022 ↗
32. Flood forecasting system based on integrated big and crowdsource data by using machine learning techniques10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963819 ↗
33. Event-based Bayesian causal modelling for flood hydrograph prediction, Upper Andarax intermittent stream, Spain10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101260 ↗
34. Identifying driving factors in flood-damaging processes using graphical models10.1029/2018WR022858 ↗
35. Deep learning in hydrology and water resources disciplines: Concepts, methods, applications, and research directions10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130458 ↗
36. Groundwater level forecasting with machine learning models: A review10.1016/j.watres.2024.121249 ↗
37. Hybrid forecasting: Blending climate predictions with AI models10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023 ↗
38. Pirnia, P., Duhaime, F., and Manashti, J. (2018, January 1–4). Machine Learning Algorithms for Applications in Geotechnical Engineering. Proceedings of the GeoEdmonton 2018 Conference, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
39. Improving streamflow prediction using multiple hydrological models and machine learning methods10.1029/2024WR038192 ↗
40. Kumar, V., Kedam, N., Sharma, K.V., Mehta, D.J., and Caloiero, T. (2023). Advanced machine learning techniques to improve hydrological prediction: A comparative analysis of streamflow prediction models. Water, 15.10.3390/w15142572 ↗
41. Baena-Navarro, R., Carriazo-Regino, Y., Torres-Hoyos, F., and Pinedo-López, J. (2025). Intelligent prediction and continuous monitoring of water quality in aquaculture: Integration of machine learning and Internet of Things for sustainable management. Water, 17.10.3390/w17010082 ↗
42. System probabilistic stability analysis of soil slopes using gaussian process regression with latin hypercube sampling10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.08.010 ↗
43. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
44. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., and Friedman, J.H. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
45. Classification and regression by randomforest
46. Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Gu, X., Wu, C., and Han, L. (2022). Application of Soft Computing, Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Optimizations in Geoengineering and Geoscience, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-16-6835-7 ↗
47. Li, M., Sun, H., Singh, V.P., Zhou, Y., and Ma, M. (2019). Agricultural water resources management using maximum entropy and entropy-weight-based TOPSIS methods. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21040364 ↗
48. Suitability evaluation system for the shallow geothermal energy implementation in region by entropy weight method and TOPSIS method10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.112 ↗
49. Optimizing the information outsourcing practices of primary care medical organizations using entropy and TOPSIS10.1007/s11135-006-9040-8 ↗
50. Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 ↗
51. Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.12.003 ↗
52. Panday, S., Langevin, C.D., Niswonger, R.G., Ibaraki, M., and Hughes, J.D. (2013). MODFLOW–USG Version 1: An Unstructured Grid Version of MODFLOW for Simulating Groundwater Flow and Tightly Coupled Processes Using a Control Volume Finite-Difference Formulation, U.S. Geological Survey.10.3133/tm6A45 ↗
53. Comparing computer experiments for the gaussian process model using integrated prediction variance10.1080/08982112.2012.758284 ↗