journal article·2025-10-27Open access

Estimating the Reliability and Predicting Damage to Ship Engine Fuel Systems Using Statistics and Artificial Intelligence

Joanna Chwał, Radosław Dzik, Arkadiusz Banasik, Wojciech M. Kempa, Zbigniew Matuszak, Piotr Pikiewicz, Ewaryst Tkacz, Iwona Żabińska

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

The reliability of ocean-going ship engine fuel systems is crucial for the safety and continuous operation of vessels. Failure of this system can lead to serious operational and economic consequences; therefore, effective diagnostics and failure prediction are essential elements of modern fleet management. This paper presents an analysis of the reliability of fuel systems based on operational data from ten bulk carriers operated by Polska Żegluga Morska in Szczecin. The analysis combined classical statistical methods with artificial intelligence algorithms to develop a hybrid diagnostic and forecasting framework. The Weibull lifetime distribution was applied to estimate time-to-failure parameters, revealing mixed failure mechanisms—random failures (k < 1) and aging-related processes (k > 1). Using the k-means algorithm, ships were automatically classified into two reliability groups: high-failure-rate units and stable operational vessels. Individual linear regression models were then developed for each ship to forecast the time to the next failure, achieving satisfactory predictive performance (R2 > 0.75 for most vessels). Sensitivity analysis quantified model robustness under different disturbance scenarios, yielding mean Relative Prediction Deviation (RPD) values of approximately 65% for Missing Data, 60% for False Failure, and 26% for Data Noise. These results confirm that the proposed hybrid reliability–AI framework is resistant to random noise but sensitive to incomplete or erroneous historical data. The developed approach provides an interpretable and effective tool for predictive maintenance, supporting reliability management and operational decision-making in marine engine systems. The article presents a hybrid model that has been developed to enable the detailed characterization of emergency processes and the identification of the most important factors that influence damage forecasting. For systems with variable failure risk, it was found that both classical probabilistic models and machine learning methods must be considered to interpret damage patterns correctly. Implementing data filtration and validation procedures before using data in artificial intelligence models has been shown to improve forecast stability and increase the usefulness of forecasts for planning repairs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Clinical Engineering, Academy of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland

Joint Doctoral School, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Medical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Faulty of Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematical Methods in Technics and Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Faculty of Marine Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland

Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education Poland

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Shu, Z., Gan, H., Ji, Z., and Liu, B. (2022). Modeling and Optimization of Fuel-Mode Switching and Control Systems for Marine Dual-Fuel Engine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10122004 ↗
2. Matuszak, Z. (2019). Safety models of systems in the engine room with renewable elements. Current Methods of Construction Design: Proceedings of the ICMD 2018, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-33146-7_41 ↗
3. Problems of Ship Power Plant Reliability Research
4. Importance assessment of ship power plant system components
5. Durlik, I., Miller, T., Kostecka, E., and Tuński, T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Maritime Transportation: A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Risk Management Applications. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188420 ↗
6. Matuszak, Z. (2012). Badania Rozkładów Uszkodzeń Systemów Siłowni Okrętowych, ADVSEO.
7. Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM)—Basics of implementation and general characteristics
8. Sun, J., Zeng, H., and Ye, K. (2024). Short-Term Exhaust Gas Temperature Trend Prediction of a Marine Diesel Engine Based on an Improved Slime Mold Algorithm-Optimized Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory—Temporal Pattern Attention Ensemble Model. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12040541 ↗
9. Eliasz, J., Osipowicz, T., Abramek, K.F., Matuszak, Z., and Mozga, Ł. (2020). Fuel Pretreatment Systems in Modern CI Engines. Catalysts, 10.10.3390/catal10060696 ↗
10. Modele bezpieczeństwa elementów i systemów odnawialnych siłowni
11. Problemy badania eksploatacyjnej niezawodności siłowni okrętowych
12. Guan, Y., Liu, L., Chen, Y., and Liu, L. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment of an Industrial Aquaponics System in Chongqing, China: Environmental Performance and Optimization Strategies. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17188254 ↗
13. Song, M.-H., Pham, X.D., and Vuong, Q.D. (2020). Torsional Vibration Stress and Fatigue Strength Analysis of Marine Propulsion Shafting System Based on Engine Operation Patterns. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8080613 ↗
14. Simion, D., Postolache, F., Fleacă, B., and Fleacă, E. (2024). AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Modern Maritime Transport—Enhancing Operational Efficiency and Reliability. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202409.0930.v1 ↗
15. Li, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., and Kang, J. (2022). Fire Risk Assessment of a Ship’s Power System under the Conditions of an Engine Room Fire. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10111658 ↗
16. Tuncel, A.L., Beşikçi, E.B., Akyuz, E., and Arslan, O. (2023). Safety analysis of fire and explosion (F&E) accidents risk in bulk carrier ships under fuzzy fault tree approach. Saf. Sci., 158.10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105972 ↗
17. Liu, Z., Guo, Z., Li, Y., Zhu, L., and Yuan, C. (2021). An Improved Failure Risk Assessment Method for Bilge System of the Large Luxury Cruise Ship under Fire Accident Conditions. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9090957 ↗
18. Comparative reliability analysis and enhancement of marine dual-fuel engines
19. Li, H., Díaz, H., and Soares, C.G. (2021). A failure analysis of floating offshore wind turbines using AHP-FMEA methodology. Ocean Eng., 234.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109261 ↗
20. Dikis, K. (2016). Dynamic Risk and Reliability Assessment for Ship Machinery Decision Making. Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781315374987-104 ↗
21. The impact of marine engine operation and maintenance on emissions10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.001 ↗
22. Condition-Based Maintenance for medium speed diesel engines used in vessels in operation10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.075 ↗
23. Evaluating the knowledge, relevance and experience of expert decision makers utilizing the Fuzzy-AHP
24. Investigating the Reliability and Criticality of the Maintenance Characteristics of a Diving Support Vessel10.1002/qre.1182 ↗
25. Performance assessment system of health, safety and environment based on experts’ weights and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation10.1016/j.jlp.2015.04.007 ↗
26. Marine Propulsion System Reliability Assesment by Fault Tree Analysis
27. A5Ling-Chin, J., and Roskilly, A.P. (2016). Investigating a conventional and retrofit power plant on-board a Roll-on/Roll-off cargo ship from a sustainability perspective—A life cycle assessment case study. Energy Convers. Manag., 117, 305–318.10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.032 ↗
28. A comparative life cycle assessment of marine power systems10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.012 ↗
29. Critical Analysis of the Mathematical Relationships and Comprehensiveness of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Approaches10.1021/es051639b ↗
30. Reliability Assessment of Main Engine Subsystems Considering Turbocharger Failure as a Case Study
31. Islam, M.R., Kim, Y.-H., Kim, J.-Y., and Kim, J.-M. (2019). Detecting and Learning Unknown Fault States by Automatically Finding the Optimal Number of Clusters for Online Bearing Fault Diagnosis. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9112326 ↗
32. Daya, A.A., and Lazakis, I. (2024). Systems Reliability and Data Driven Analysis for Marine Machinery Maintenance Planning and Decision Making. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12050294 ↗
33. Wahyuningrum, T., Khomsah, S., Suyanto, S., Meliana, S., Yunanto, P.E., and Al Maki, W.F. (2021, January 16–17). Improving Clustering Method Performance Using K-Means, Mini Batch K-Means, BIRCH and Spectral. Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Yogyakarta, Indonesia.10.1109/ISRITI54043.2021.9702823 ↗
34. Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes10.1214/aoms/1177729437 ↗
35. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises tests10.1214/aoms/1177706788 ↗
36. On the composition of elementary errors
37. von Mises, R. (1931). Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Fr. Deuticke.10.1515/crll.1931.165.184 ↗
38. A method for assessing of ship fuel system failures resulting from fuel changeover imposed by environmental requirements10.17531/ein.2021.4.4 ↗
39. Dong, X., Jing, Z., Dai, Y., Wang, P., and Chen, Z. (2022). Failure Prediction and Replacement Strategies for Smart Electricity Meters Based on Field Failure Observation. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22249804 ↗
40. Papathanasiou, D., Demertzis, K., and Tziritas, N. (2023). Machine Failure Prediction Using Survival Analysis. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15050153 ↗
41. A combined technique for power transformer fault diagnosis based on k-means clustering and support vector machine10.1049/nde2.12088 ↗
42. A Hybrid Model for Anomalies Detection in AMI System Combining K-means Clustering and Deep Neural Network
43. Data-driven model for marine engine fault diagnosis using in-cylinder pressure signals10.1080/20464177.2024.2432777 ↗
44. Zhu, L., Qiu, J., Chen, M., and Jia, M. (2022). Approach for the structural reliability analysis by the modified sensitivity model based on response surface function—Kriging model. Heliyon, 8.10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10046 ↗
45. Research on Fault Prediction for Marine Diesel Engines10.4236/jcc.2020.88004 ↗
46. Ventikos, N.P., Sotiralis, P., and Annetis, E. (2022). A combined risk-based and condition monitoring approach: Developing a dynamic model for the case of marine engine lubrication. Transp. Saf. Environ., 4.10.1093/tse/tdac020 ↗
47. Review of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis for marine power systems10.1093/tse/tdab005 ↗
48. Uhlmann, E., Stark, R., Rethmeier, M., Baumgarten, J., Bilz, M., Geisert, C., Graf, B., Gumenyuk, A., Grosser, H., and Heitmüller, F. (2015). Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul in Through-Life Engineering Services. Through-Life Engineering Services, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-12111-6_9 ↗
49. Fuzzy Early Warning Systems for Condition Based Maintenance10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.056 ↗
50. Dikis, K., Lazakis, I., and Theotokatos, G. (2015, January 28–29). Risk and Reliability Analysis Tool Development for Ship Machinery Maintenance. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics (SOME), Athens, Greece.
51. Nielsen, J.J., and Sørensen, J.D. (October, January 30). Risk Based Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines Using Bayesian Networks. Proceedings of the 6th EAWE PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe, Trondheim, Norway.
52. Modelling and Application of Condition-Based Maintenance for a Two-Component System with Stochastic and Economic Dependencies10.1016/j.ress.2018.10.007 ↗
53. Detection and diagnosis of incipient faults in heavy-duty diesel engines10.1109/TIE.2009.2038337 ↗
54. Tests concerning random points on a circle