Effect of Ply Orientation and Triaxiality on Mesh Regularization for Carbon/Epoxy Composites Through Material Parameter Estimation
Source abstract
Abstract
The mesh size significantly affects the accuracy and computational efficiency of finite-element analysis (FEA) simulations. This study investigates mesh regularization to mitigate mesh dependency, align numerical results with experimental data, and optimize the computational time for carbon/epoxy composites. Mesh regularization was implemented using the ∗MAT_ADD_GENERALIZED_DAMAGE (MAGD) model in LS-DYNA, which incorporates a scaling factor based on the ply orientation and stress triaxiality to adjust the material failure criterion. To address the limitations of trial-and-error methods for determining scaling factors, four analytical models were developed to predict these factors as functions of element size. These predictions were validated against experimentally derived scaling factors for unidirectional carbon/epoxy composites across three ply orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°) and three stress triaxiality conditions (tension, compression, and shear) using mesh sizes ranging from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. The scaling factor effectively reduced the mesh dependency in the tested configurations. A clear relationship between ply orientation and mesh regularization was established; however, no definitive correlation was observed with stress triaxiality. Among the theoretical approaches, the stress degradation model yielded the most consistent predictions, although discrepancies with the experimental results indicate the need for further refinement. This study proposes integrating scaling factors into a material model as a practical approach to mesh regularization for orthotropic materials and evaluates existing theoretical models for predicting these factors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, 2901 Woodside Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
References (93)
Show source-provided references
1. High resolution two-dimensional shear band computations: Imperfections and mesh dependence10.1016/0045-7825(94)00073-5 ↗
2. Bracamonte, A.J., Mercado-Puche, V., Martínez-Arguelles, G., Pumarejo, L.F., Ortiz, A.R., and Herazo, L.C.S. (2023). Effect of Finite Element Method (FEM) Mesh Size on the Estimation of Concrete Stress–Strain Parameters. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042352 ↗
3. A mesh-independent framework for crack tracking in elastodamaging materials through the regularized extended finite element method10.1007/s00466-021-02016-2 ↗
4. Kahla, N.B., AlQadhi, S., and Ahmed, M. (2023). Mesh-Free MLS-Based Error-Recovery Technique for Finite Element Incompressible Elastic Computations. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13126890 ↗
5. Physical Regime Sensitivity10.1007/s40870-023-00375-w ↗
6. Chen, W., Zheng, X., and Liu, S. (2018). Finite-Element-Mesh Based Method for Modeling and Optimization of Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11112073 ↗
7. Peng, Y., Liu, Y., and Zhang, W. (2021). Analysis of Dynamic Response Behavior of Crack under Impact Stress Wave. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11121920 ↗
8. Investigation of the Collapse Behavior of Aluminum Burr-Filled Cylindrical Energy Absorber Under Low-Velocity Impact10.1007/s40870-024-00420-2 ↗
9. Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Ballistic Performance of Ultra High Hard Armour Steel Joints Welded Using Shielded Metal Arc Welding Process and Austenitic Stainless Steel Electrode10.1007/s40870-024-00421-1 ↗
10. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Aluminum-Polyethylene Composite Structure Subjected to Tension and Perforation Under Dynamic Loading for a Wide Range of Temperatures10.1007/s40870-023-00400-y ↗
11. Impact-Induced Through-Thickness Stress Wave Propagation and Damage in Woven Composites10.1007/s40870-022-00354-7 ↗
12. Liu, P., Xing, Q., Wang, D., and Oeser, M. (2017). Application of Dynamic Analysis in Semi-Analytical Finite Element Method. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10091010 ↗
13. Fantuzzi, N. (2020). Special Issue “Mesh-Free and Finite Element-Based Methods for Structural Mechanics Applications”. Math. Comput. Appl., 25.10.3390/mca25040075 ↗
14. Ahmed, M., Singh, D., AlQadhi, S., and Alrefae, M.A. (2021). Mesh Free Radial Point Interpolation Based Displacement Recovery Techniques for Elastic Finite Element Analysis. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9161900 ↗
15. Zhang, C., An, S., Wang, W., and Lin, D. (2021). A Novel Meshing Method Based on Adaptive Size Function and Moving Mesh for Electromagnetic Finite Element Analysis. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13020254 ↗
16. Takabi, B., and Tai, B.L. (2019). Finite Element Modeling of Orthogonal Machining of Brittle Materials Using an Embedded Cohesive Element Mesh. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 3.10.3390/jmmp3020036 ↗
17. Chan, T.C., Ullah, A., Roy, B., and Chang, S.L. (2023). Finite element analysis and structure optimization of a gantry-type high-precision machine tool. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-40214-5 ↗
18. FEM Simulation of High Speed Impact Behaviour of Additively Manufactured AlSi10Mg Alloy10.1007/s40870-020-00285-1 ↗
19. Modelling Failure of Polymers: An Optimization Strategy Based on Genetic Algorithms and Instrumented Impact Tests10.1007/s40870-021-00297-5 ↗
20. Soda-Lime Glass Constitutive Parameters and Finite Element Model for Simulating Ballistic Impact10.1007/s40870-021-00310-x ↗
21. Characterization, Modeling, and Ballistic Impact of Kevlar/Phenolic PVB Composite10.1007/s40870-023-00376-9 ↗
22. Mechanical Behaviour of Pressed HMX and TATB-Based PBXs During Low-Velocity Impact10.1007/s40870-023-00390-x ↗
23. Strain-softening materials and finite-element solutions10.1016/0045-7949(86)90210-5 ↗
24. Investigation of Mesh Dependency of Materials Fracture in the Finite Element Simulation of a Projectile Penetrating into a Target10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.782.302 ↗
25. 3D Finite Element Modelling of Fracture of Sand Particles Subjected to High Strain Loading Rate10.1007/s40870-019-00211-0 ↗
26. Component-Level Finite Element Model and Validation for a Modern American Football Helmet10.1007/s40870-019-00189-9 ↗
27. Topology Optimization for Projectile Design10.1007/s40870-018-0143-9 ↗
28. On the Processing of Spalling Experiments. Part I: Identification of the Dynamic Tensile Strength of Concrete10.1007/s40870-017-0135-1 ↗
29. On the Processing of Spalling Experiments. Part II: Identification of Concrete Fracture Energy in Dynamic Tension10.1007/s40870-017-0138-y ↗
30. Application of extended Mohr–Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture10.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
31. New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016 ↗
32. Micromechanically-motivated phenomenological Hosford-Coulomb model for predicting ductile fracture initiation at low stress triaxialities10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.024 ↗
33. Simplification of the Gurson model for large-scale plane stress problems10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10.004 ↗
34. Partially coupled anisotropic fracture model for aluminum sheets10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.024 ↗
35. Prediction of plane strain fracture of AHSS sheets with post-initiation softening10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.04.028 ↗
36. The effect of low stress triaxialities and deformation paths on ductile fracture simulations of large shell structures10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.08.004 ↗
37. Influence of softening on fracture propagation in large-scale shell structures10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.027 ↗
38. An incremental stress state dependent damage model for ductile failure prediction10.1007/s10704-016-0081-2 ↗
39. Framework for adjusting for both stress triaxiality and mesh size effect for failure of metals in shell structures10.1080/13588265.2013.825366 ↗
40. Andrade, F.D.A., Feucht, M.D.A., and Haufe, A.D.G. (2014, January 8–10). On the Prediction of Material Failure in LS-DYNA®: A Comparison Between GISSMO and DIEM. Proceedings of the 13th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Detroit, MI, USA.
41. Johnson, G.R., and Cook, W.H. (1983, January 19–21). A constitutive model and data from metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands.
42. Evaluation of cylinder-impact test data for constitutive model constants10.1063/1.341344 ↗
43. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
44. Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations10.1063/1.338024 ↗
45. The effect of dislocation drag on the stress-strain behavior of F.C.C. metals10.1016/0956-7151(92)90166-C ↗
46. A constitutive model for metals applicable at high-strain rate10.1063/1.327799 ↗
47. Haight, S., Wang, L., Bois, D.P., Carney, K., and Kan, C.D. (2025, October 01). Development of a Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V Material Model Used in LS-DYNA. DOT/FAA/TC-15/23, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57630.
48. Yatnalkar, R.S. (2010). Experimental Investigation of Plastic Deformation of Ti-6Al-4V Under Various Loading Conditions. [Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University].
49. Wang, L., Dicecca, F., Haight, S., Carney, K., Dubois, P., Emmerling, W., and Kan, C.D. (2016, January 12–14). Test and Simulation Comparison using Titanium Material Models based on MAT224. Proceedings of the 14th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Detroit, MI, USA.
50. Modeling fracture in large scale shell structures10.1016/j.jmps.2012.07.001 ↗
51. An improved criterion to minimize FE mesh-dependency in concrete structures under high strain rate conditions10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.07.008 ↗
52. The effect of finite element mesh size in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures10.1016/0045-7949(90)90151-Q ↗
53. A Lode-dependent enhanced Lemaitre model for ductile fracture prediction at low stress triaxiality10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.021 ↗
54. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
55. A coupled stress-triaxiality-dependent damage viscoplasticity model on crack initiation and propagation in high-strength rail steel10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102769 ↗
56. Ductile fracture prediction for metal sheets using all-strain-based anisotropic eMMC model10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.022 ↗
57. A study of Inconel 718 dependency on stress triaxiality and Lode angle in plastic deformation and ductile fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.007 ↗
58. Electrical discharge-mechanical hybrid drilling of micro-holes in carbon fibre-reinforced polymers10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2024.104243 ↗
59. A Progressive Damage Model for Laminated Composites Containing Stress Concentrations10.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
60. Numerical comparison between Hashin and Chang-Chang failure criteria in terms of inter-laminar damage behavior of laminated composite10.1088/2053-1591/ac1d40 ↗
61. Progressive failure and ultimate collapse of laminated composite plates in bending10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00030-0 ↗
62. Failure Strength of Nonlinearly Elastic Composite Laminates Containing a Pin Loaded Hole10.1177/002199838401800506 ↗
63. Analytical examination of mesh-dependency issue for uniaxial RC elements and new fracture energy-based regularization technique10.1177/10567895211039262 ↗
64. Implementing deformation, damage, and failure in an orthotropic plastic material model10.1177/0021998319865006 ↗
65. (2008). Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials (Standard No. ASTM D3039/D3039M-08).
66. Littell, J. (2008). The Experimental and Analytical Characterization of the Macromechanical Response for Triaxial Braided Composite Materials. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Akron]. Available online: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1224164770.
67. (2016). Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading (Standard No. ASTM D3410/D3410M-16e1).
68. (2019). Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Composite Materials by the V-Notched Beam Method (Standard No. ASTM D5379/D5379M-19e1).
69. Analysis of axial vibration frequency for projectile structure in penetration
70. Belytschko, T., Liu, W., Moran, B., and Elkhodary, K. (2013). Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures, Wiley. No Longer used.
71. Jiang, N., Wu, S., Hu, Y., Mu, Z., Wu, X., and Zhang, W. (2020). Investigations into the Role of Friction for Rigid Penetration into Concrete-like Material Targets. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214733 ↗
72. On the friction effects on rigid-body penetration in concrete and aluminium-alloy targets10.1016/j.dt.2019.03.003 ↗
73. Wriggers, P. (2006). Constitutive Equations for Contact Interfaces. Computational Contact Mechanics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-32609-0 ↗
74. Unified Framework and Survey for Model Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification10.1007/s11831-020-09473-7 ↗
75. An uncertainty quantification framework for logistic regression based geospatial natural hazard modeling10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107271 ↗
76. Basic Framework and Main Methods of Uncertainty Quantification
77. The effect of the orientation of cubical projectiles on the ballistic limit and failure mode of AA2024-T351 sheets10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.026 ↗
78. 3D anisotropic mesh adaptation by mesh modification10.1016/j.cma.2004.11.019 ↗
79. Adaptive remeshing based on a posteriori error estimation for forging simulation10.1016/j.cma.2005.06.029 ↗
80. Otaduy, M.A., and Sorkine, O. (2013, January 6–10). Adaptive Remeshing for Real-Time Mesh Deformation. Proceedings of the Eurographics 2013—Short Papers, Girona, Spain.
81. The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique10.1002/nme.1620330702 ↗
82. The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 2: Error estimates and adaptivity10.1002/nme.1620330703 ↗
83. Residual-Based Procedures for Prediction and Estimation in a Nonlinear Simultaneous System10.2307/1911492 ↗
84. A residual based error estimator for mortar finite element discretizations10.1007/s002110050467 ↗
85. On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: Application to the control of pointwise errors10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00343-0 ↗
86. Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for the finite element method10.1016/S0898-1221(00)00317-5 ↗
87. A Local A Posteriori Error Estimator Based on Equilibrated Fluxes10.1137/S0036142903433790 ↗
88. An Equilibrated Flux A Posteriori Error Estimator for Defeaturing Problems10.1137/23M1627195 ↗
89. Goal-oriented error estimation based on equilibrated flux and potential reconstruction for the approximation of elliptic and parabolic problems10.1016/j.camwa.2023.07.008 ↗
90. Numerical simulation of metal forming processes with 3D adaptive Remeshing strategy based on a posteriori error estimation10.1007/s12289-018-1425-4 ↗
91. Giacomini, M. (2016). Quantitative a Posteriori Error Estimators in Finite Element-Based Shape Optimization. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris Saclay (COmUE)].
92. Fast High-Order Mesh Correction for Metric-Based Cavity Remeshing and a Posteriori Curving of P2 Tetrahedral Meshes10.1016/j.cad.2023.103575 ↗
93. Pointwise dual weighted residual based goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement in 2D/3D thermo-mechanical multifield problems10.1016/j.cma.2019.112666 ↗