Microscopic Behavioral and Psychological Analysis of Road User Interactions in Shared Spaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The concept of shared space is proposed to improve the safety and health of vulnerable road users (VRUs) by promoting walking and cycling. However, despite the documented benefits of shared spaces, concerns were raised about the frequency and severity of road user interactions in shared spaces. Thus, the objective of this study is to investigate the microscopic behaviors and psychological characteristics of vulnerable road user interactions (i.e., pedestrian–e-bike interactions and pedestrian–cyclist interactions) in non-motorized shared spaces and their interplay mechanisms. We identify a total of 334 interactions in the same- and opposite-direction using the Dutch Objective Conflict Technique for Operation and Research (DOCTOR) method at four locations in Shenzhen city, China. Trajectories of road users involved in these interactions were extracted to identify key points in trajectories and interaction phases, considering both microscopic behaviors and psychological factors synthetically. The study also compared lateral and longitudinal decision distances, maneuvering distances, maneuvering time, and safety zones across different characteristics, including severity levels, road user types, genders, and whether road users carry large items or not. The results show that the main characteristic of the interaction’s starting and ending points changes in the lateral direction. Road users have a stronger sense of security in swerve-back phases. The average lateral psychological safety distance in shared spaces is about 1.125 m. Moreover, the average safety zone area for road users in opposite and same-direction interactions are 4.83 m2 and 9.36 m2, respectively. Road users carrying large items perceived a higher risk in shared spaces and required longer lateral psychological safety distances and larger safety zones. The findings of this study can be used to better design shared space facilities, considering the perceived risk of road users and their interactions and psychological behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
MSE Department, University Canada West, Vancouver, BC V6Z 0E5, Canada
Faculty of Applied Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
ACSS Department, University Canada West, Vancouver, BC V6Z 0E5, Canada
Ministry of Public Works, Kuwait City 12011, Kuwait
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province · Open Project of Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education · Science Research Project of Hebei Education Department
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. How to make more cycling good for road safety?10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.010 ↗
2. Ma, C., Yang, D., Zhou, J., Feng, Z., and Yuan, Q. (2019). Risk riding behaviors of urban e-bikes: A literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16132308 ↗
3. Road traffic injuries among riders of electric bike/electric moped in southern China10.1080/15389588.2018.1423681 ↗
4. World Health Organization, Department of Violence, Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Violence, Injury Prevention,, and World Health Organization (2009). Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for Action, World Health Organization.
5. UK Department for Transport (2011). Local Transport Note 1/11---Shared Space, UK Department for Transport.
6. Microscopic behavioural analysis of cyclist and pedestrian interactions in shared spaces10.1139/cjce-2018-0777 ↗
7. Analysis of pedestrian–vehicle traffic conflicts in street designs with elements of shared space10.3141/2393-03 ↗
8. Characteristics of passing and meeting maneuvers on exclusive bicycle paths10.3141/1776-28 ↗
9. Characterization of bicycle following and overtaking maneuvers on cycling paths10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.012 ↗
10. Behaviour and perceptions of powered two-wheeler users in street designs with elements of shared space10.1016/j.trf.2021.05.007 ↗
11. Assessing safety of shared space using cyclist-pedestrian interactions and automated video conflict analysis10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.001 ↗
12. Markov-game modeling of cyclist-pedestrian interactions in shared spaces: A multi-agent adversarial inverse reinforcement learning approach10.1016/j.trc.2021.103191 ↗
13. Modelling cyclists’ comfort zones from obstacle avoidance manoeuvres10.1016/j.aap.2020.105609 ↗
14. Microscopic pedestrian interaction behavior analysis using gait parameters10.3141/2519-04 ↗
15. A bi-directional agent-based pedestrian microscopic model
16. Pedestrian gait analysis using automated computer vision techniques
17. The effects of safety knowledge and psychological factors on self-reported risky driving behaviors including group violations for e-bike riders in China10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.004 ↗
18. Traffic safety for electric bike riders in China: Attitudes, risk perception, and aberrant riding behaviors10.3141/2314-07 ↗
19. Evaluating bicyclists’ risk perception using video clips: Comparison of frequent and infrequent city cyclists10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.006 ↗
20. Research on relationship between risk perception and cycling crashes in electric cyclists10.1177/1687814019851639 ↗
21. Interaction behaviour of active mobility users in shared space10.1016/j.tra.2021.08.017 ↗
22. Perceived safety and experienced incidents between pedestrians and cyclists in a high-volume non-motorized shared space
23. van der Horst, A.R.A. Manual Conflict Observation Technique DOCTOR Dutch Objective Conflict Technique for Operation and Research (Report 2013-1), Foundation Road Safety for All. Originally published in 1986 by Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid SWOV and Instituut voor Zintuigfysiologie TNO; SWOV rapport R-86-3; Leidschendam, Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid SWOV Rapport IZF 1986 C-6; Soesterberg, Instituut voor Zintuigfysiologie TNO; 2013.
24. Amundsen, F.H.E., and Hydén, C.H. (1977). Proceedings of the First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Lund Institute of Technology.
25. Investigating conflict behaviours and characteristics in shared space for pedestrians, conventional bicycles and e-bikes10.1016/j.aap.2021.106167 ↗
26. Investigating cycling kinematics and braking maneuvers in the real world: E-bikes make cyclists move faster, brake harder, and experience new conflicts10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.008 ↗
27. The German Naturalistic Cycling Study--Comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.027 ↗
28. T-Analyst (2025, October 20). Semi-Automated Video Processing. Available online: https://bitbucket.org/TrafficAndRoads/tanalyst/wiki/Manual.
29. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras lenses10.1109/JRA.1987.1087109 ↗
30. Modelling cyclist queue formation using a two-layer framework for operational cycling behaviour10.1016/j.trc.2019.06.012 ↗
31. Modeling cyclist acceleration process for bicycle traffic simulation using naturalistic data. Transp. Res10.1016/j.trf.2016.04.009 ↗
32. Traffic conflicts and their contextual factors when riding conventional vs. electric bicycles10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.010 ↗
33. Microscopic modeling of pedestrian movement behavior: Interacting with visual attractors in the environment10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.009 ↗
34. Application of microscopic pedestrian simulation model10.1016/j.trf.2005.08.006 ↗
35. Microscopic behavioural analysis of cyclists-pedestrian conflicts in shared spaces using explainable AI
36. Calibrating a social force based model for simulating personal mobility vehicles and pedestrian mixed traffic10.1016/j.simpat.2018.08.002 ↗
37. Modelling shared space users via rule-based social force model10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.012 ↗
38. Modeling the interactions between car and bicycle in heterogeneous traffic10.1002/atr.1257 ↗
39. Observation results on pedestrian-vehicle interactions at non-signalized intersections towards simulation10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.016 ↗
40. Drivers overtaking bicyclists—An examination using naturalistic driving data10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.010 ↗
41. How do drivers overtake cyclists?10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.008 ↗
42. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data10.1016/j.aap.2020.105494 ↗
43. Alsaleh, R., Walia, K., Moshiri, G., and Alsaleh, Y.T. (2025). Traffic Collision Severity Modeling Using Multi-Level Multinomial Logistic Regression Model. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15020838 ↗
44. Lignoski, B. (2002). Bicycle Stability, Is the Steering Angle Proportional to the Lean?, Physics Department, The College of Wooster.
45. Influences on lateral passing distance when motor vehicles overtake bicycles: A systematic literature review10.1080/01441647.2020.1768174 ↗
46. Electric-bicycle-related injury: A rising traffic injury burden in China10.1136/ip.2009.024646 ↗
47. Modeling faults among e-bike-related fatal crashes in China10.1080/15389588.2016.1228922 ↗