Dengue Fever Classification Integrating Bird Swarm Algorithm with Gradient Boosting Classifier Along with Feature Selection and SHAP–DiCE Based Interpretability
Source abstract
Abstract
Dengue is a life-threatening disease that is transmitted by mosquitoes. Dengue fever has no proper treatment. Early, proper diagnosis is essential to minimize complications and enhance outcomes in patients. This research uses a clinical and hematological dataset of dengue to assess the effectiveness of the Gradient Boosting (GB) classification model with and without feature selection. It initially employs a standalone GB model, achieving impeccable results for classification, at 100% accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall. In addition, the Bird Swarm Algorithm (BSA)-based metaheuristic technique is implemented on the GB classifier to execute wrapper-based feature selection so that features are reduced and achieve better results. The BSA-GB model yielded an accuracy of 99.49%, F1-score of 99.62%, recall of 99.24%, and precision of 100%, but it only selected five features in total. An additional test with a five-fold cross-validation was employed for better performance and model evaluation. Folds 1 and 2 showed especially good results. Although fold 2 selected only four features, it still showed high results, compared to fold 1, which selected five features. In this context, fold 2 achieved an accuracy of 99.49%, F1-score of 99.65%, recall of 99.30%, and precision of 100%. Means of hyperparameters were also calculated across folds to make a generalized GB model, which maintained 99.49% of accuracy with just three features, namely, Hemoglobin, WBC Count, and Platelet Count. To enhance transparency, counterfactual explanations were performed to analyze the misclassified cases, which indicated that minimum changes in input features modify the predictions. Also, an evaluation of the SHAP value result designated WBC Count and Platelet Count as the most important features.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mosquito-borne diseases and control · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electronics and Communication Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
Centre for Wireless Technology, CoE for Intelligent Network, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence & Engineering, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Dengue: A continuing global threat10.1038/nrmicro2460 ↗
2. World Health Organization (2024, April 23). Dengue and Severe Dengue. WHO Fact Sheets. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue.
3. Dengue10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60572-9 ↗
4. Dengue virus pathogenesis: An integrated view10.1128/CMR.00035-09 ↗
5. A comprehensive hematological dataset for dengue incidence in Bangladesh10.1016/j.dib.2025.111664 ↗
6. Mayrose, H., Bairy, G.M., Sampathila, N., Belurkar, S., and Saravu, K. (2023). Machine learning-based detection of dengue from blood smear images utilizing platelet and lymphocyte characteristics. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13020220 ↗
7. Wavelet scattering-and object detection-based computer vision for identifying dengue from peripheral blood microscopy10.1002/ima.23020 ↗
8. Ho, T.-S., Weng, T.-C., Wang, J.-D., Han, H.-C., Cheng, H.-C., Yang, C.-C., Yu, C.-H., Liu, Y.-J., Hu, C.H., and Huang, C.-Y. (2020). Comparing machine learning with case-control models to identify confirmed dengue cases. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 14.10.1371/journal.pntd.0008843 ↗
9. Machine learning for dengue outbreak prediction: A performance evaluation of different prominent classifiers10.31449/inf.v43i3.1548 ↗
10. A benchmark dataset for analyzing hematological responses to dengue fever in Bangladesh10.1016/j.dib.2024.111030 ↗
11. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
12. A review of feature selection and its methods
13. A new bio-inspired optimisation algorithm: Bird Swarm Algorithm10.1080/0952813X.2015.1042530 ↗
14. Mothilal, R.K., Sharma, A., and Tan, C. (2020, January 27–30). Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Barcelona, Spain.10.1145/3351095.3372850 ↗
15. On the tractability of SHAP explanations10.1613/jair.1.13283 ↗
16. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Curran Associates, Inc.
17. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
18. Low platelet count associated with dengue hemorrhagic fever
19. Haematological parameters as predictors of severe dengue: A study from northern districts of West Bengal, India10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_119_24 ↗