Comparative Analysis of Rock Mass Characterization Techniques to Recommend Geomechanical Prevention Mechanisms Using UAV Photogrammetry

Rock mass characterization is crucial for evaluating slope stability and recommending effective prevention mechanisms. This study presents a comparative analysis of three approaches for discontinuity analysis: (1) conventional field survey, (2) digital manual measurement on 3D models generated with UAV-based photogrammetry, and (3) semi-automatic analysis based on clustering algorithms (K-NN) for point cloud segmentation. All three methods were applied to the same slope, allowing their performance to be evaluated in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and replicability. The results showed that the semi-automatic method achieved the highest coverage (81%) and identified 586 discontinuities, with RMSE values of 2.58° for orientation, 0.087 m for spacing, and 2.05 m for persistence, using the conventional method as a reference. The digital manual method, with 19% coverage, yielded very low error (RMSE of 3.27° for orientation, 0.012 m for spacing, and 0.063 m for persistence), validating it as a complementary and reliable alternative. In contrast, the conventional method required the longest execution time (10 h) and achieved only 19% coverage, being the least replicable due to its dependence on expert judgment. Overall, the comparison highlights the advantages of digital methods, especially the semi-automatic approach, in improving efficiency, safety, and replicability, while providing robust information to recommend prevention strategies for rock slope stability.