journal article·2025-10-24Open access

Influence of Well Spacing on Polymer Driving in E Reservoir of Daqing Oilfield

Yanchang Su, Jiantao Du, Hongnan Li, Yao Zhou, Zhiyu Wei, Wenbo Zhao, Zhiqiang Wang, Yanfu Pi

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 21

Abstract

The E reservoir in Daqing Oilfield exhibits strong heterogeneity, resulting in inconsistent performance of conventional development methods. Polymer flooding is currently implemented using 106 m and 150 m well patterns. To characterize the influence of well spacing variations on polymer flooding effectiveness and enhance oil recovery, we conducted experiments to evaluate the apparent viscosity, solution concentration, viscoelasticity, plugging resistance, and profile modification performance of polymer solutions at different relative migration distances. Subsequent experiments employing differently scaled intra-layer heterogeneous models investigated polymer flooding’s oil recovery enhancement at various migration distances. Results indicate the following: (1) At identical relative migration distances, polymer systems in shorter sand-packed tubes demonstrate a higher effective migration distance proportion and superior viscoelasticity compared to 30 cm models, enabling more effective remaining oil mobilization and improved microscopic displacement efficiency. (2) The 20 cm sand-packed tube model exhibits enhanced plugging resistance and profile modification capabilities with higher maintained viscosity and concentration retention. Polymer solutions at 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% migration distances in longer tubes established resistance factors of 30, 15, 7.8, and 3.6, and residual resistance factors of 9.6, 5.6, 2.2, and 1.5, respectively. These solutions effectively migrate to reservoir depths, forming efficient plugs and demonstrating superior deep profile control compared to their longer tube counterparts. (3) Polymer flooding response occurred at 0.194 PV injection in the 40 cm model with a maximum water cut reduction of 36.04%, whereas the 60 cm model required 0.31 PV injection to achieve a response, yielding only a 26.7% maximum water cut reduction. This comparative result demonstrates that smaller well spacing enables faster establishment of effective displacement pressure systems, suppresses high-permeability layer channeling, and significantly improves medium- and low-permeability layer utilization efficiency. (4) Crude oil mobilization in medium- and low-permeability layers is substantially reduced in larger well-spacing models. Collectively, reduced well spacing accelerates polymer flooding response, mitigates reservoir heterogeneity impacts, and extends the operational range of polymer plugging resistance and profile modification capabilities, thereby increasing recovery in heterogeneous reservoirs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Sixth Oil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd., Daqing 163114, China

Geological Research Institute of the Sixth Oil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd., Daqing 163114, China

Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery of Ministry of Education, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. A salt-induced tackifying polymer for enhancing oil recovery in high salinity reservoirs: Synthesis, evaluation, and mechanism10.1016/j.gee.2023.10.006 ↗
2. Research progress and potential of new enhanced oil recovery methods in oilfield development10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60518-5 ↗
3. Advances in enhanced oil recovery technologies for low permeability reservoirs10.1016/j.petsci.2022.06.010 ↗
4. Enhanced oil recovery using polymer alternating CO2 gas injection: Mechanisms, efficiency, and environmental benefits10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04258 ↗
5. Low-Salinity Polymer Flood for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Low-Permeability Carbonates10.2118/210233-PA ↗
6. Hu, J., Jiang, P., Zhang, G., Ge, J., and Pei, H. (2018, January 16–17). Study on Polymer Flooding Profile Control and Antimony Technology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Material Science, Energy and Environmental Engineering (MSEEE 2018), Xi’an, China.10.2991/mseee-18.2018.7 ↗
7. Progress and prospects of oil and gas production engineering technology in China10.1016/S1876-3804(22)60054-5 ↗
8. An overview of oil recovery techniques: From primary to enhanced oil recovery methods10.55544/jrasb.3.1.48 ↗
9. Remaining oil distribution characteristics in an oil reservoir with ultra-high water-cut10.1016/j.engeos.2022.06.004 ↗
10. Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., and Yan, M. (2019, January 19–21). Formation mechanism and distribution characteristics of micro residual oil in ultra-high water cut reservoirs a case study of yangsanmu oilfield. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Energy Engineering and Environmental Protection, Xiamen, China.
11. A review of development methods and EOR technologies for carbonate reservoirs10.1007/s12182-020-00467-5 ↗
12. Pashchenko, A.O., Borodina, A.N., Yavorska, O., Ishkov, V.V., and Cherniaiev, O.V. (2024, January 21–24). Application of polymer flooding to increase oil recovery. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine.
13. Leon, J.M., and Masalmeh, S.K. (2025, January 12–14). Evaluation of Alternative Polymer-Based EOR Mechanisms to Improve Sweep Efficiency and Water Management in Complex Light Oil Carbonate Reservoirs in Abu Dhabi. Proceedings of the SPE Conference at Oman Petroleum & Energy Show, Muscat, Oman.10.2118/225044-MS ↗
14. Gbadamosi, A., Patil, S., Kamal, M.S., Adewunmi, A.A., Yusuff, A.S., Agi, A., and Oseh, J. (2022). Application of Polymers for Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Review. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14071433 ↗
15. Karimov, D., and Toktarbay, Z. (2023). Enhanced oil recovery: Techniques, strategies, and advances. ES Mater. Manuf., 23.10.30919/esmm1005 ↗
16. Experimental study on surface-active polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery: A case study of Daqing placanticline oilfield, NE China10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60274-0 ↗
17. Factors influencing oil recovery by surfactant-polymer flooding in conglomerate reservoirs and its quantitative calculation method10.1016/j.petsci.2022.01.001 ↗
18. Zhang, X., Yu, J., Liu, L., Liu, X., Lu, X., and Feng, Q. (2025). Experimental Investigation of Synergistic Enhanced Oil Recovery by Infill Well Pattern and Chemical Flooding After Polymer Flooding. Gels, 11.10.3390/gels11080660 ↗
19. Olabode, O., Dike, H., Olaniyan, D., Oni, B., and Faleye, M. (2024). Experimental investigation of the effect of surfactant–polymer flooding on enhanced oil recovery for medium crude oil. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16121674 ↗
20. Sun, X., Zhao, M., Fan, X., Zhang, Y., Xu, C., Wang, L., and Sang, G. (2022). Study on micro production mechanism of corner residual oil after polymer flooding. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14050878 ↗
21. Ameli, F., Moghadam, S., and Shahmarvand, S. (2022). Polymer flooding. Chemical Methods, Gulf Professional Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-821931-7.00003-1 ↗
22. Yan, Y., Wang, L., Sang, G., and Han, X. (2022). Influence of polymer viscoelasticity on microscopic remaining oil production. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14050940 ↗
23. Dafaalla, M., Azad, M.S., Ayirala, S., Alotaibi, M., Fahmi, M., Saleh, S., Al Shehri, D., and Mahmoud, M. (2025). Potential of polymer’s viscosity and viscoelasticity for accessible oil recovery during low salinity polymer flooding in heterogeneous carbonates. Fuel, 379.10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133008 ↗
24. He, J., Jin, X., Liu, X., Yuan, L., Liu, R., Chen, S., Wu, H., Yang, W., Wang, J., and Zhang, H. (2025). Comprehensive Study on Viscosity-Increasing and Oil Displacement Characteristics of Functional Polymer. Processes, 13.10.3390/pr13061859 ↗
25. Polymer flooding: Current status and future directions10.1016/j.petsci.2023.02.002 ↗
26. Kummar, S., Dull, N.R., Helsper, S., and Liberatore, M.W. (2025). Effect of shear rate, temperature, and salts on the viscosity and viscoelasticity of semi-dilute and entangled xanthan gum. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 142.10.1002/app.56372 ↗
27. Flow of concentrated viscoelastic polymer solutions in porous media: Effect of MW and concen-tration on elastic turbulence onset in various geometries10.1039/C5SM01042J ↗
28. Mechanism of anomalously increased oil displacement with aqueous viscoelastic polymer solutions10.1039/C5SM00064E ↗
29. Review of Practical Experience by Polymer Flooding at Daqing10.2118/114342-PA ↗
30. The impact of well spacing on three-dimensional in situ extraction of oil shale using high-temperature air injection10.1063/5.0201622 ↗
31. Mukhametshin, V.V., Gilyazetdinov, R.A., Kuleshova, L.S., Novruzova, S.H., and Askerov, V.M. (2024). On the depth of identification of objects in the study of the influence of the density of the grid of wells on the degree of production of oil reserves. Horizons, 26.10.5510/OGP2024SI100958 ↗
32. Well Spacing Optimization to Enhance the Performance of Tight Reservoirs10.1134/S0965544124050189 ↗
33. Mukhametshin, V.S., Kuleshova, L., Yakupov, R., Vafin, R., and Gilyazetdinov, R. (2023, January 11). Features of localization of remaining oil in terrigenous reservoirs and potential for their recovery at the final stage of field development. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference “Energy, Ecology and Technology in Agriculture” (EEA2023), Khujand, Tajikistan.
34. Experimental simulation study on influencing factors of liquid production capacity in heterogeneous water drive reservoirs10.1063/5.0184992 ↗
35. A review on viscosity retention of PAM solution for polymer flooding technology10.1080/10916466.2022.2120011 ↗