A Fragmentation-Centric Framework for Impact Hammer Selection in Immediate-Collapse-Prone Tunneling: Integrating Mucking Efficiency into Cycle-Time Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Tunneling through weak rock masses under shallow urban overburdens is critically constrained by stand-up time. Conventional models for hydraulic impact hammers prioritize the excavation rate (Net Breaking Rate—NBR) but overlook a key operational bottleneck: the mucking process. This study introduces a paradigm shift from “how fast can we excavate?” to “how can we excavate to facilitate rapid muck clearance?”; it presents a novel, data-driven framework that, for the first time, quantitatively links impact hammer operation to mucking efficiency via the resulting particle size distribution (P50). Field data from metro line excavations in very weak rock (RMR 18-33) were used to develop empirical models via multiple linear regression. The analysis produced (1) a model predicting mucking duration (tₘ) from muck volume (V) and post-excavation mean particle size (P50) and (2) a model predicting NBR from rock mass rating (RMR) and the rock size reduction ratio (F). These models are synthesized into a comprehensive operational equation, enabling engineers to select an impact hammer based on its ability to produce a target P50 that ensures mucking can be completed within the project’s critical stability window. This transforms rock fragmentation from an incidental byproduct into a central, controllable factor in equipment selection and proactive risk management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mining Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34500 Istanbul, Turkey
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Performance prediction of hydraulic breakers in excavation of a rock mass
2. Jaeger, J.C., Cook, N.G.W., and Zimmerman, R.W. (2007). Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, Wiley-Blackwell. [4th ed.].
3. Comparative studies on the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and drilling and blasting method in the excavation of metro station tunnels in Istanbul10.1016/j.tust.2009.11.002 ↗
4. Accurate performance prediction model for impact hammer developed using customized evolutionary algorithm10.1016/j.tust.2020.103773 ↗
5. Impact hammer applications in Istanbul metro tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.007 ↗
6. ANN and ANFIS performance prediction models for hydraulic impact hammers10.1016/j.tust.2011.06.004 ↗
7. Mechanization of underground mining: A quick look backward and forward10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00116-1 ↗
8. Predicting performance of impact hammers from rock quality designation and compressive strength properties in various rock masses10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.008 ↗
9. Copur, H., Balci, C., Bilgin, N., Tumac, D., and Avunduk, E. (2012). Predicting cutting performance of chisel tools by using physical and mechanical properties of natural stones. ISRM International Symposium-EUROCK 2012, International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
10. Performance prediction of impact hammer using ensemble machine learning techniques10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.030 ↗
11. Bilgin, N., Copur, H., and Balci, C. (2013). Mechanical Excavation in Mining and Civil Industries, Taylor and Francis Group.10.1201/b16083 ↗
12. Hojjati, S. (2015). Suggestion of Performance Prediction Models for Impact Hammer Used in Levent-Hisarustu Metro Tunnel. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
13. An updated formula and method to predict the performance of impact hammers10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.008 ↗
14. Barla, G. (1996). A model to predict the performance of road-headers and impact hammers in tunnel drivages. Prediction and Performance in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Proceedings of the Eurock 96, Turin, Italy, 2–5 September 1996, Balkema.
15. The performance prediction of impact hammers from Schmidt hammer rebound values in Istanbul metro tunnel drivages10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00009-3 ↗
16. Performance prediction of impact hammers by block punch index for weak rock masses10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.02.008 ↗
17. Determination of instantaneous breaking rate by geological strength index, block punch index and power of impact hammer for various rock mass conditions10.1016/j.tust.2011.02.005 ↗
18. Prediction of the performance of impact hammer by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system modeling10.1016/j.tust.2010.06.011 ↗
19. Proje, Y. (2018). Geological and Geotechnical Investigation Program for the Depot Area and Connection Line of the Istanbul New Airport—Halkalı Metro Line Project, Yuksel Proje. (In Turkish).
20. İBB (2017). Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality(İBB) Rail Systems Department European Side Rail Systems Directorate, Geological–Geotechnical Study Report of the Basaksehir–Kayasehir Metro Line Route Implementation Project, İBB. (In Turkish).
21. Ozer, U., Karadogan, A., Ozyurt, M.C., Sertabipoglu, Z., and Kalaycı Sahinoglu, U. (2025, October 16). Preliminary Drill-and-Blast Design Based on Risk Analysis within the Scope of the Halkali–New Airport Metro Line Construction and Electromechanical Systems Procurement, Installation, and Commissioning Works, Ist Univ-Cerrahpasa Eng Fac Revolving Fund. 2019. (In Turkish).
22. Engineering classification of jointed rock masses
23. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1984). Rock Mechanics Design in Mining and Tunneling, A. A. Balkema Publishers.
24. Ontology-driven knowledge graph for decision-making in resilience enhancement of underground structures: Framework and application10.1016/j.tust.2025.106739 ↗
25. Theoretical and numerical analysis of the rock breaking process by impact hammer10.1016/j.powtec.2024.120254 ↗