journal article·2025-10-21Open access

Research on Computing Power Resources-Based Clustering Methods for Edge Computing Terminals

Jian Wang, Jiali Li, Xianzhi Cao, Chang Lv, Liusong Yang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

In the “cloud–edge–end” three-tier architecture of edge computing, the cloud, edge layer, and end-device layer collaborate to enable efficient data processing and task allocation. Certain computation-intensive tasks are decomposed into subtasks at the edge layer and assigned to terminal devices for execution. However, existing research has primarily focused on resource scheduling, paying insufficient attention to the specific requirements of tasks for computing and storage resources, as well as to constructing terminal clusters tailored to the needs of different subtasks.This study proposes a multi-objective optimization-based cluster construction method to address this gap, aiming to form matched clusters for each subtask. First, this study integrates the computing and storage resources of nodes into a unified concept termed the computing power resources of terminal nodes. A computing power metric model is then designed to quantitatively evaluate the heterogeneous resources of terminals, deriving a comprehensive computing power value for each node to assess its capability. Building upon this model, this study introduces an improved NSGA-III (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III) clustering algorithm. This algorithm incorporates simulated annealing and adaptive genetic operations to generate the initial population and employs a differential mutation strategy in place of traditional methods, thereby enhancing optimization efficiency and solution diversity. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm consistently outperformed the optimal baseline algorithm across most scenarios, achieving average improvements of 18.07%, 7.82%, 15.25%, and 10% across the four optimization objectives, respectively. A comprehensive comparative analysis against multiple benchmark algorithms further confirms the marked competitiveness of the method in multi-objective optimization. This approach enables more efficient construction of terminal clusters adapted to subtask requirements, thereby validating its efficacy and superior performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cognitive Computing and Networks · Power Systems and Technologies · Technology and Security Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Computer and Control Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Piran, M.J., and Suh, D.Y. (2019, January 22–23). Learning-driven wireless communications, towards 6G. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (iCCECE), London, UK.10.1109/iCCECE46942.2019.8941882 ↗
2. Offloading using traditional optimization and machine learning in federated cloud-edge-fog systems: A survey10.1109/COMST.2023.3239579 ↗
3. Edge-cloud computing and artificial intelligence in internet of medical things: Architecture, technology and application10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997831 ↗
4. Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198 ↗
5. Radouane, B., Lyamine, G., Ahmed, K., and Kamel, B. (2022, January 30–31). Scalable mobile computing: From cloud computing to mobile edge computing. Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Networking, Information Systems and Security: Envisage Intelligent Systems in 5G//6G-based Interconnected Digital Worlds (NISS), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/NISS55057.2022.10085600 ↗
6. Edge computing in big data: Challenges and benefits10.1007/s41060-025-00855-3 ↗
7. A survey of privacy-preserving offloading methods in mobile-edge computing10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103395 ↗
8. Energy-efficient task allocation for reliable parallel computation of cluster-based wireless sensor network in edge computing10.1016/j.dcan.2022.06.014 ↗
9. Gadasin, D., Shvedov, A., and Koltsova, A. (2020, January 20–22). Cluster model for edge computing. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH), Vienna, Austria.10.1109/EMCTECH49634.2020.9261538 ↗
10. Sharded blockchain for collaborative computing in the Internet of Things: Combined of dynamic clustering and deep reinforcement learning approach10.1109/JIOT.2022.3152188 ↗
11. A cluster-based cooperative computation offloading scheme for C-V2X networks10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102862 ↗
12. Cao, X., Chen, C., Li, S., Lv, C., Li, J., and Wang, J. (2025). Research on computing task scheduling method for distributed heterogeneous parallel systems. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-94068-0 ↗
13. Xiao, A., Lu, Z., Du, X., Wu, J., and Hung, P.C. (2020, January 19–23). ORHRC: Optimized recommendations of heterogeneous resource configurations in cloud-fog orchestrated computing environments. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICWS49710.2020.00059 ↗
14. Convergent grey wolf optimizer metaheuristics for scheduling crowdsourcing applications in mobile edge computing10.1109/JIOT.2023.3304909 ↗
15. Combinatorial metaheuristic methods to optimize the scheduling of scientific workflows in green DVFS-enabled edge-cloud computing10.1016/j.aej.2023.11.074 ↗
16. Metaheuristic-based task scheduling for latency-sensitive IoT applications in edge computing10.1007/s10586-024-04878-6 ↗
17. Incentive-driven task allocation for collaborative edge computing in industrial internet of things10.1109/JIOT.2021.3085143 ↗
18. Nie, Y., Jiang, W., Ma, G., He, Y., Zhao, H., Hu, Y., and Chen, Z. (2024, January 10–12). Virtual Power Plant Analysis Task Offloading Strategy Based on Delay and Task Requirements in Cloud Edge Collaboration System. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 7th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Harbin, China.10.1109/CIEEC60922.2024.10583828 ↗
19. A novel framework for mobile-edge computing by optimizing task offloading10.1109/JIOT.2021.3064225 ↗
20. Efficient caching in vehicular edge computing based on edge-cloud collaboration10.1109/TVT.2022.3213130 ↗
21. Designing an efficient clustering strategy for combined fog-to-cloud scenarios10.1016/j.future.2020.03.056 ↗
22. Optimizing resource allocation for cluster D2D-assisted fog computing networks: A three-layer Stackelberg game approach10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110601 ↗
23. Amer, I.M., and Sorour, S. (2022, January 16–20). Cost-based compute cluster formation in edge computing. Proceedings of the ICC 2022—IEEE International Conference on Communications, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICC45855.2022.9838830 ↗
24. Dankolo, N.M., Radzi, N.H.M., Mustaffa, N.H., Arshad, N.I., Nasser, M., Gabi, D., and Yusuf, M.N. (2025). Optimizing resource allocation for IoT applications in the edge cloud continuum using hybrid metaheuristic algorithms. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-97648-2 ↗
25. Cloud-load forecasting via decomposition-aided attention recurrent neural network tuned by modified particle swarm optimization10.1007/s40747-023-01265-3 ↗
26. Multi-objective-derived energy efficient routing in wireless sensor network using adaptive black hole-tuna swarm optimization strategy10.1016/j.adhoc.2023.103140 ↗
27. Optimization of sensor selection problem in IoT systems using opposition-based learning in many-objective evolutionary algorithms10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107625 ↗
28. Pareto multi-objective termite colony optimization based EDT clustering for wireless chemical sensor network10.1007/s11277-023-10245-2 ↗
29. Jagadeesh, S., and Muthulakshmi, I. (2021). Dynamic clustering and routing using multi-objective particle swarm optimization with Levy distribution for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Commun. Syst., 34.10.1002/dac.4902 ↗
30. A review on constraint handling techniques for population-based algorithms: From single-objective to multi-objective optimization10.1007/s11831-022-09859-9 ↗
31. An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: Solving problems with box constraints10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 ↗
32. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
33. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00389-8 ↗
34. Multi-objective planning for voltage sag compensation of sparse distribution networks with unified power quality conditioner using improved NSGA-III optimization10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.120 ↗
35. Dutta, S., M, S.S.R., Mallipeddi, R., Das, K.N., and Lee, D.G. (2021). A mating selection based on modified strengthened dominance relation for NSGA-III. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9222837 ↗