On the Use of Machine Learning Methods for EV Battery Pack Data Forecast Applied to Reconstructed Dynamic Profiles
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries are essential to electric vehicles, so it is crucial to continuously monitor and control their health. However, since today’s battery packs consist of hundreds or thousands of cells, monitoring all of them is challenging. Additionally, the performance of the entire battery pack is often limited by the weakest cell. Therefore, developing effective monitoring techniques that can reliably forecast the remaining time to depletion (RTD) of lithium-ion battery cells is essential for safe and efficient battery management. However, even in robust systems, this data can be lost due to electromagnetic interference, microcontroller malfunction, failed contacts, and other issues. Gaps in voltage measurements compromise the accuracy of data-driven forecasts. This work systematically evaluates how different voltage reconstruction methods affect the performance of recurrent neural network (RNN) forecast models trained to predict RTD through quantile regression. The paper uses experimental battery pack data based on the behavior of an electric vehicle under dynamic driving conditions. Artificial gaps of 500 s were introduced at the beginning, middle, and end of each discharge phase, resulting in over 4300 reconstruction cases. Four reconstruction methods were considered: a zero-order hold (ZOH), an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model, a gated recurrent unit (GRU) model, and a hybrid unscented Kalman filter (UKF) model. The results presented here reveal that the UKF model, followed by the GRU model, outperform alternative reconstruction methods. These models minimize signal degradation and provide forecasts similar to the original past data signal, thus achieving the highest coefficient of determination and the lowest error indicators. The reconstructed signals were fed into LSTM and GRU RNNs to estimate RTD, which produced confidence intervals and median values for decision-making purposes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Data Processing Techniques · Mining Techniques and Economics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electronics Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Electrical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Ostadi, A., Kazerani, M., and Chen, S.K. (2013, January 16–19). Optimal sizing of the Energy Storage System (ESS) in a Battery-Electric Vehicle. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Detroit, MI, USA.10.1109/ITEC.2013.6574521 ↗
2. Advances in Batteries, Battery Modeling, Battery Management System, Battery Thermal Management, SOC, SOH, and Charge/Discharge Characteristics in EV Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3318121 ↗
3. A Sensor Fault Diagnosis Method for a Lithium-Ion Battery Pack in Electric Vehicles10.1109/TPEL.2019.2893622 ↗
4. Spoorthi, B., and Pradeepa, P. (2022, January 21–23). Review on Battery Management System in EV. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Controller and Computing for Smart Power (ICICCSP), Hyderabad, India.
5. Prada, E., Di Domenico, D., Creff, Y., and Sauvant-Moynot, V. (2013, January 17–20). Towards Advanced BMS Algorithms Development for (P)HEV and EV by Use of a Physics-Based Model of Li-ion Battery Systems. Proceedings of the 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/EVS.2013.6914790 ↗
6. Li, B., Fu, Y., Shang, S., Li, Z., Zhao, J., and Wang, B. (2021, January 25–27). Research on Functional Safety of Battery Management System (BMS) for Electric Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Automation and Applications (ICAA), Nanjing, China.10.1109/ICAA53760.2021.00055 ↗
7. Popp, A., Fechtner, H., Schmuelling, B., Kremzow-Tennie, S., Scholz, T., and Pautzke, F. (2021, January 9–11). Battery Management Systems Topologies: Applications: Implications of Different Voltage Levels. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Power and Energy Applications (ICPEA), Busan, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICPEA52760.2021.9639285 ↗
8. Sensing-based monitoring systems for electric vehicle battery—A review10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100050 ↗
9. Kosuru Rahul, V.S., and Kavasseri Venkitaraman, A. (2023). A Smart Battery Management System for Electric Vehicles Using Deep Learning-Based Sensor Fault Detection. World Electr. Veh. J., 14.10.3390/wevj14040101 ↗
10. Efficient battery fault monitoring in electric vehicles: Advancing from detection to quantification10.1016/j.energy.2024.134150 ↗
11. Battery Hazards for Large Energy Storage Systems10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01400 ↗
12. Data driven battery anomaly detection based on shape based clustering for the data centers class10.1016/j.est.2020.101479 ↗
13. Bhaskar, K., Kumar, A., Bunce, J., Pressman, J., Burkell, N., and Rahn, C. (2023). Data-Driven Thermal Anomaly Detection in Large Battery Packs. Batteries, 9.10.3390/batteries9020070 ↗
14. Real-world cross-battery state of charge prediction in electric vehicles with machine learning: Data quality analysis, data repair and training data reconstruction10.1016/j.energy.2025.138322 ↗
15. Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 ↗
16. Physics-incorporated convolutional recurrent neural networks for source identification and forecasting of dynamical systems10.1016/j.neunet.2021.08.033 ↗
17. Nonlinear stabilization under sampled and delayed measurements, and with inputs subject to delay and zero-order hold10.1109/TAC.2011.2170451 ↗
18. Lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction based on a mixture of empirical mode decomposition and ARIMA model10.1016/j.microrel.2016.07.151 ↗
19. Riba, J.R., Gómez-Pau, Á., Martínez, J., and Moreno-Eguilaz, M. (2021). On-Line Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Power Connectors Focused on Predictive Maintenance. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21113739 ↗
20. (2025, September 29). pmdarima: ARIMA Estimators for Python—Pmdarima 2.0.4 Documentation. Available online: https://alkaline-ml.com/pmdarima/.
21. State of charge estimation of power Li-ion batteries using a hybrid estimation algorithm based on UKF10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.042 ↗
22. Performance evaluation of UKF-based nonlinear filtering10.1016/j.automatica.2005.10.004 ↗
23. de la Vega, J., Riba, J.R., and Ortega-Redondo, J.A. (2023). Real-Time Lithium Battery Aging Prediction Based on Capacity Estimation and Deep Learning Methods. Batteries, 10.10.20944/preprints202312.0384.v1 ↗
24. Hussein, A.A.H., and Batarseh, I. (2011, January 24–28). An overview of Generic Battery Models. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA.10.1109/PES.2011.6039674 ↗
25. Probabilistic quantile multiple fourier feature network for lake temperature forecasting: Incorporating pinball loss for uncertainty estimation10.1007/s12145-024-01448-7 ↗
26. Pinball boosting of regression quantiles10.1016/j.csda.2024.108027 ↗
27. de la Vega Hernández, J., Ortega Redondo, J.A., and Riba Ruiz, J.-R. (2025, July 30). Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Cycling Dataset with CC-CV Charging and WLTP/Constant Discharge Profiles. Available online: https://dataverse.csuc.cat/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.34810/data2395.
28. de La Vega, J., Riba, J.-R., and Ortega, J.A. (2025). Advanced Battery Test Bench for Realistic Vehicle Driving Conditions Assessment, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.10.1109/CPE-POWERENG63314.2025.11027228 ↗
29. Hand joints-based gesture recognition for noisy dataset using nested interval unscented Kalman filter with LSTM network10.1007/s00371-018-1556-0 ↗
30. State of Health Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Voltage Curves Reconstruction by Conditional Generative Adversarial Network10.1109/TTE.2024.3386212 ↗
31. An Unscented Kalman Filter-Based Method for Reconstructing Vehicle Trajectories at Signalized Intersections10.1155/2021/6181242 ↗
32. Li, J., Zhang, C., Cao, Q., Qi, C., Huang, J., and Xie, C. (2017, January 7–9). An Experimental Study on Deep Learning Based on Different Hardware Configurations. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS), Shenzhen, China.10.1109/NAS.2017.8026843 ↗