Design, Implementation and Experimental Validation of an ADCS Helmholtz Cage
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a validation process of a Helmholtz cage developed by the authors at AGH University of Krakow. This type of test stand can generate a near-uniform, precisely controlled magnetic field inside its workspace. This is a crucial tool for several applications, including calibration of magnetic sensors, testing magnetorquers, and hardware-in-the-loop tests of attitude determination and control systems of small satellites. Although many institutions develop Helmholtz cages, we found the literature on methods of validating the final accuracy and uniformity of the generated magnetic field somewhat lacking. In this research, we showcase an approach to perform 3D scans of the magnetic field inside the cage using a probe actuated by a robotic arm. With that method, we verified that the magnitude and angle nonuniformity of the magnetic field vectors in our cage are below 2 percent and 0.4°, respectively, for a wide range of control inputs. We also perform background magnetic field measurements to identify and quantify sources of magnetic disturbances coming from the outside of our system and propose methods of minimizing their impact. It turns out that careful design and building process of the cage and its power driver might not be sufficient to achieve the optimal performance. In our case, we found that some factors, if unmitigated, can cause an error of a few milligauss. Hopefully, this work will help other teams developing similar devices avoid at least some of the possible pitfalls.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Effects in Electronics · CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors · Space Satellite Systems and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departament of Automation and Robotics, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Departament of Robotics and Mechatronics, AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Funding
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system at the Alibag Magnetic Observatory: Upgraded to a magnetic sensor calibration facility10.5194/gi-7-143-2018 ↗
2. Chaisakulsurin, J., Manuthasna, S., Masri, T., Panyalert, T., Palee, K., Prasit, P., Kamsing, P., and Torteeka, P. (2023, January 24–27). Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation Testbed for Three-Axis Earth’s Magnetic Field Generation Based on 2.4- Meter Square Helmholtz Coils. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Monterey, CA, USA.10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10139939 ↗
3. Springmann, J., Cutler, J., and Bahcivan, H. (2010, January 2–5). Magnetic Sensor Calibration and Residual Dipole Characterization for Application to Nanosatellites. Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. AIAA, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.2514/6.2010-7518 ↗
4. Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem Testing Environment for 12U Nanosatellites10.1109/JMASS.2022.3203023 ↗
5. Design, Manufacturing, and Test of a Real-Time, Three-Axis Magnetic Field Simulator10.1109/TAES.2011.5751264 ↗
6. Three-Axial Helmholtz Coil Design and Validation for Aerospace Applications10.1109/TAES.2017.2760560 ↗
7. Helmholtz Cage Design and Validation for Nanosatellites HWIL Testing10.1109/TAES.2019.2898309 ↗
8. Olsen, J.A., Grøtte, M.E., and Gravdahl, J.T. (2021, January 25–29). Attitude determination and control system testbed for hardware and software testing and verification for HYPSO small satellites. Proceedings of the 72nd International Astronautical Congress, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
9. de Loiola, J.V.L., van der Ploeg, L.C., Cardoso da Silva, R., Guimarães, F.C., Borges, R.A., Borges, G.A., Battistini, S., and Cappelletti, C. (2018, January 3–10). 3 Axis simulator of the Earth magnetic field. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO.2018.8396570 ↗
10. Optimum design of a three-axis magnetic field simulator10.1109/TAES.2002.1008981 ↗
11. Uniform magnetic field produced by three, four, and five square coils10.1063/1.1137480 ↗
12. Magdaleno-Adame, S., Olivares-Galvan, J., Campero-Littlewood, E., Escarela-Perez, R., and Blanco Brisset, E. (2010, January 7–9). Coil Systems to Generate Uniform Magnetic Field Volumes. Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010, Boston, MA, USA.
13. Belaidi, E.Y., Aissa, B., Benzina, M.B., Mokhtar, A.A., Kada, H., and Brahim, G. (2024, January 3–5). Development of Magnetometer Sensors Calibration Platform and Orbital Satellite Scenario Emulation. Proceedings of the 2024 11th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace), Lublin, Poland.10.1109/MetroAeroSpace61015.2024.10591608 ↗
14. Prinkey, M. (2013, January 19–22). CubeSat Attitude Control Testbed Design: Merritt 4-Coil per axis Helmholtz Cage and Spherical Air Bearing. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Boston, MA, USA.10.2514/6.2013-4942 ↗
15. Alvarez, A.F.R., Franco-Mejía, E., and Pinedo-Jaramillo, C.R. (2012, January 7–9). Study and Analysis of Magnetic Field Homogeneity of Square and Circular Helmholtz Coil Pairs: A Taylor Series Approximation. Proceedings of the 2012 VI Andean Region International Conference, Cuenca, Ecuador.10.1109/Andescon.2012.27 ↗
16. Test bed for simulation of magnetic field measurements of low Earth orbit satellites10.7494/mech.2015.34.3.47 ↗
17. Identification of the orbit semi-major axis using frequency properties of onboard magnetic field measurements10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.024 ↗
18. An orbit determination algorithm for small satellites based on the magnitude of the earth magnetic field10.1051/eucass/201810035 ↗
19. (2025, July 18). INTECO. Available online: https://www.inteco.com.pl/.
20. Batch Algorithm for Balancing the Air Bearing Platform10.1007/978-3-030-50936-1_62 ↗
21. Modenini, D., Bahu, A., Curzi, G., and Togni, A. (2020). A dynamic testbed for nanosatellites attitude verification. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7030031 ↗
22. STANDA (2025, July 18). 8MR190-2-28 Rottary Stage. Available online: https://www.standa.lt/products/catalog/motorised_positioners?item=244.
23. Optimum Spacing of Square and Circular Coil Pairs
24. Tutaj, A. (2025, September 10). 2025. Available online: https://github.com/spaceagh/sat-helmholtz/.
25. Mathworks (2025, July 18). ode45() Function Documentation. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/ode45.html.
26. INTECO (2025, July 18). RT-DAC/Zynq User’s Manual. Available online: http://www.inteco.com.pl/Docs/Rtdac_Zynq.pdf.
27. Mitsubishi (2025, July 18). RV-2F-D Series Standard Specifications Manual. Available online: https://dl.mitsubishielectric.com/dl/fa/document/manual/robot/bfp-a8900/bfp-a8900ag.pdf.
28. (2025, July 18). Magnetometer Model MR3. Available online: https://www.alphalabinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/mr3_2016.pdf.
29. Onovughe, E.V. (2015). Geomagnetic Diurnal Variation Studies Using Global Models & Observatory Data at Quiet & Moderately Disturbed Times. [Ph.D. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology].